Saturday, November 27, 2021

Apple’s Support of Armed Robbers Reminds Some Observers of When It Aided and Abetted the Racist, black Torture-Murderer of White Jayna Murray


[“Gang of 12 Raceless Robbers Murdered Security Guard Protecting Reporter; daily mail Refused to ID Robbers, While Apple (Which Aided and Abetted the Lululemon Murderer) Aided and Abetted Them.”]

By N.S. and Eahilf

“On Wednesday, four young men, believed by police to be between the ages of 14 and 18, entered and grabbed $20,000 worth of merch from a Santa Rosa Apple store before fleeing in what authorities called a ‘brazen daytime burglary’ [sic] in broad daylight.

“A detective from the Santa Rosa Police Department said they weren’t notified about the theft until 10 minutes after it occurred due to an Apple in-house protocol.”

The daily mail reported the foregoing, as if it were perfectly normal. First of all, it wasn’t a burglary, which involves breaking into premises and stealing items of value. But worse was Apple’s “protocol,” which forces employees to aid and abet thieves and robbers, by giving them adequate time to escape, and handcuffs the police from catching them. This is morally despicable in at least two ways: It celebrates crime, and it also picks the pockets of customers, who must not only help Apple remain the world’s richest company, but also compensate the company for its losses due to crime which the company itself supports.

By Eahilf

“While Apple (Which Aided and Abetted Lululemon Murderer)...”

Lululemon Murder: Apple Store Employees Listen to Slaying

All told, it’s an unremarkable snippet of video. On the night that Brittany Norwood murdered fellow Lululemon employee Jayna Murray in Bethesda last March 11, two Apple Store employees are seen standing next to a wall, then walk away. ... However, when you factor in that the wall the employees were standing next to was shared with the Lululemon next door and that they were most likely listening to the murder in progress, the video gains a ton of context. ... Ever since that night, the employees have come under fire for not calling Montgomery County Police.

The Apple employees:

The woman in the Apple Store video, which was first shown on ABC7 News on Monday, is Jana Svrzo. ... The other person in the video is Ricardo Rios, the manager of the Apple Store.

Kudos to the proprietor – search results for Jana Svrzo and Ricardo Rios contain many links to posts on this blog.

I recalled the case, but not many details.

N.S.: Thank you.

I had fervently wished that Jayna Murray’s parents had sued both Lululemon and Apple. Lululemon bore a great deal of moral and legal culpability for Murray’s death. They knew that the racist monster who would torture and slaughter her, Brittany Norwood, was a habitual thief. So, what did they do? They shuffled Norwood from one store to another. Then they made Murray deal with Norwood alone.

Ditto for Apple. Jana Svrzo and Ricardo Rios heard the entire murder. Brittany Norwood disabled Jayna Murray with a blow from a blunt object, presumably to the head, from a tool from a stack of them, which were being used for a building job inside the store. (Murray was a big, strong woman, who probably could have handled Norwood. But racist blacks and sucker-punches.) Norwood then proceeded to bludgeon Murray another 321 times, over the course of 20-30 minutes. The helpless, wounded Murray could do nothing but scream out in pain, and beg for her life.

The workers in the Apple store heard it all. The two black security guards asked to call the police, but Jana Svrzo and Ricardo Rios, both White, ordered them to refrain from doing so.

And guess whom Apple ended up firing? Yup, the two black security guards.

The Kitty Genovese murder-rape (he liked them dead—no resistance) by black Winston Moseley was not a case of dozens of witnesses ignoring Genovese’s cries for help. That was a hoax concocted by the nypd and the new york times. But the Jayna Murray torture-murder was the real thing.

I had fervently hoped that Murray’s parents would sue Lululemon and Apple. Not only would such a suit have cost each company millions of dollars in damages, but the negative publicity would have cost each tens of millions of additional dollars in lost business. It might’ve put Lululemon out of business.

I thank my friend and partner-in-crime, David in TN, who did tremendous work on this case.

Previously, at WEJB/NSU:

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

That merchandise at Apple supposedly cannot be activated when stolen. You need an access which only Apple can provide.

And beating someone that many times for that amount of time and NO ONE calling the cops aiding and abetting in the figurative sense and not legal.