Saturday, January 27, 2024

“history being made secret”: they won't be viewing "peace pipes" at the ny museum of natural history; injuns just privatized history, with the support of the museum director

By A Colleague
friday, january 26, 2024 at 04:54:42 p.m. est

they won't being viewing "peace pipes" at the ny museum of natural history

This is very funny good news. There's no reason we should be teaching reverence and respect for these artifacts of a bunch of culture-free stone age barbarians.

Like the removal of Aunt Jemima, Uncle Ben, and that meaningless pic of a squaw on food packages, we are better off not depicting these folks as worthy of respect, or having to regard their stone age junk as even interesting.

"the shocking evacuation started just hours after museum director Sean Decatur announced the changes in a letter to staff friday morning.

“'the halls we are closing are artifacts of an era when museums such as ours did not respect the values, perspectives and indeed shared humanity of indigenous peoples,' Decatur wrote in the missive obtained by the post.

What a pathetic liar. Sean Decatur had just gotten his marching orders that day, and yet he's all full of sanctimony, as if he'd been fighting to rid the museum of injun relics for years. Following his twisted logic, the feds could empty out the entire museum. He needs to resign. He has no right to one penny of taxpayer beneficence.

“Actions that may feel sudden to some may seem long overdue to others,” he added.

N.S.: Detective Sipowicz speaking here: The post needs to get its lies straight. Either the AMNH suddenly deprived the public of its American Indian relics due to new regulations, or a new law. Since the law was passed in 1990, this has nothing to do with the law.

The AMNH had always respected American Indian history. Following Sean Decatur's twisted logic, the feds could empty out the entire museum.

Ditto for the fake archaeology "expert," Candace Sall, who spoke of “best practices" and "consulting" with people who are completely hostile towards public education, and "tribal partners" (they're not "partners" at all), the "co-production of knowledge," and "sensitive work" and "respect" (White deference). When it's the history of White people, there's no talk of "sensitive work" and "the utmost respect."

N.S.: Keith David “everything in there was approved by the various tribes.”

Then the knowledge is unreliable. Someone needs to open a can of whoopa** on these fake museum directors. It ain’t the job no more.

“Sure about this? Your post seems to include language which may be considered inappropriate in our community. You can either revise your comment or have it reviewed by a moderator. Learn More”

N.S.: Gauleiter: I see you’ve turned on the governor on me.

Gauleiter: “Your comment was rejected.”

Learn more

Postscript, 6:23 p.m.: It looks like the Gauleiter deleted all of my comments.

https://nypost.com/2024/01/26/metro/nyc-museum-of-natural-history-closing-native-american-exhibits-new-tribal-consent-laws/



11 comments:

Anonymous said...

So Whites shouldn't have come over and booted the Indians out,but blacks and mex can boot Whites out?The big difference when Whites did it,the process was evolutionary--an improvement.With blacks and Mex,it,'s not only de-evolutionary,but destructive of everything accomplished the previous 400 years by Whites.

If Europeans hadn't explored North America,where would the Indians be today in the evolutionary progression?The same as then,slightly improved?It's a moot point,actually,but the smarter people of the world don't just sit and twittle their thumbs and waste their knowledge,they use it to advance society--and it happens naturally.

--GRA

Anonymous said...

Have I got a book for you: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18901674-a-fate-worse-than-death?from_search=true&from_srp=true&qid=BWOy7kXbu0&rank=2 I'm half way through it and let me tell you, you will never want to sit through another sanctimonious Western. How the monstrous butchery perpetrated by the American Indians got transformed into a false history that turned THEM into victims defies the imagination. The only thing comparable to Indian cruelty and violence is the way contemporary blacks behave, and they have the "excuse" of being high on drugs all the time. The book is sickening and depressing but an important document of forgotten, whitewashed history. -RM

Anonymous said...

One book vs woke Hollywood/liberal college history classes .Who wins that that argument about revisionism?
It won't be Whitey.

--GRA

Anonymous said...

The "revisionism" regarding the Indians began long before "Hollywood," liberal college, or even Communism came along- that's the damndest thing about the narrative. One victim blames the fiction writers of the period for romanticizing the savages in their novels- so maybe there's something innately wrong and dishonest with "artists" and their worldview, as we've seen throughout the 20th century. Or maybe there was always some subversive force at work in America- if Lincoln, one of the most destructive and corrupt Presidents ever, could be transformed into an icon in his own time, as if by magic, anything is possible. -RM

Anonymous said...

I have read many dozen books about frontier history and It is apparent that some tribes made war for pleasure, glory, and material gain--most commonly to steal horses. While there were some tribes that were peaceful farmers, and some which produced beautiful arts and crafts, others like the Comanches and Apaches produced nothing--except war. Some Apaches expressed scorn for White men who worked hard for a living--Apaches preferred to steal whatever they needed. And Apaches and Comanches enjoyed fiendish tortures of their captives. I recently read how Apaches would give their children baby animals and smile and encourage them to torture them. Some tribes like Navajos did NOT torture or even scalp the enemies--but they did kill them when necessary to steal their stock. Some present day Indians are fine, honest, and upright people. But it is actually denigrating to treat everything about Indians with reverence. Do Scandinavians demand that we honor the violent actions of their Viking ancestors? Indians constantly displaced other tribes and yet we are supposed to feel guilty that Whites were more successful. And unlike Indians, Whites did not exterminate their enemies, but set up reservations and fed their defeated foes. Of course as in every government program there was corruption and incompetence, but the fact is that Whites did not just exterminate even the most violent tribes. In fact, after surrendering, the chief of the Comanches--one of the cruelest and most violent tribes--became a rich man owning shares of banks and railroads.

Anonymous said...

I cannot even understand what would be considered to be too offensive about displaying peace pipes. It is beyond my comprehension.

Anonymous said...

If these groups such as American Indians, mex Orientals and blacks, don’t like Whitey the next time, you are very sick and need to go to the hospital just don’t do so just go to your local shaman, your faith healer and see what they can do for you that is the answer to all matters of life keep it within your own community. If you must use voodoo to receive a cure for cancer well go ahead and do that. See my how much good it does you Indians American Indians a very good drumming to they can put themselves in trances with chants Maybe that will work also

Anonymous said...

HILARIOUS:MEDIA GOES BONKERS OVER Jackie Robinson STATUE GETTING CHOPPED OFF AT THE ANKLES AND HAULED AWAY IN KANSAS

GRA:Everyone on msm is at "full outrage" level--similar to DEF-CON ONE.Maybe it was a tornado that did the deed.

(CNN)Police in Wichita, Kansas, are asking for help to locate a stolen statue of Jackie Robinson.

League 42, a nonprofit that provides low-cost baseball registration primarily for children ages 5-14, had raised $50,000 for the statue at its field, according to CNN affiliate KLBY. The league was named in honor of Jackie Robinson, whose jersey number was 42.

Before Robinson became the first black player in Major League history, he was signed by the Kansas City Monarchs of the negro Leagues shortly after he was discharged by the military in 1944.


Pictures shared by the police department Thursday showed the life-sized statue was cut off at the ankles and hauled away. According to police, the theft occurred shortly after midnight local time on Thursday.

(start violins here)The statue of Robinson “was a symbol of hope” in the community, Wichita City Council member Brandon Johnson told CNN on Sunday.

“It means a whole lot and it’s unfortunate that someone backed in there around midnight and took it,” Johnson said. The theft “breaks my heart for all of those kids and parents and coaches,” he added.

But the councilman said he was hopeful the statue would be found soon.

“Our police department has been working day and night to make sure we find out who did this,” he said.

There has been a good response from the public and local businesses who provided more camera footage, Johnson said.

(end violins,start "threatening "Jaws" music).

At a Friday news conference,(White) Wichita Police Chief Joe Sullivan said he was “frustrated by the actions of those individuals who had the audacity to take the statue of Jackie Robinson from a park where kids and families and our community gathered to learn the history of Jackie Robinson, an American icon, and play the game of baseball. This should upset all of us.”

“What troubles me even more is that the theft occurred just before the beginning of February, which marks the start of black history month. Our city wants the statue returned,” Sullivan added.

The local Crimestoppers organization is offering up to $2,500 for a tip leading to an arrest and an additional $5,000 for the recovery of the statue, Steve Cohlmia, president of the Wichita Metro Crime Commission said Friday.

--GRA

Anonymous said...

WHITES BLUBBER ABOUT robinson STATUE

(GRA)I watched abc broadcast their report and White police chief Joe Sullivan blubbered about black history month,but ANOTHER White who was interviewed said, "This is a sacred place,where the first black broke the color barrier."

A White guy in his SEVENTIES!

I can't believe what I just saw.

--GRA

Anonymous said...

Robinson WAS fast--even as a statue,he ran right out of his shoes.

--GRA

Anonymous said...

Now the question is,who stole the statue--Whites--or blacks trying to pull a race hoax?I lean to the latter.

--GRA