Amber Guyger and Bothem Jean

By Nicholas Stix

This week saw Amber Guyger convicted of murder and sentenced to ten years in prison for killing black CPA Bothem Jean, 26. Guyger was 30 at the time of her crime.

There’s a war on white policemen raging, and at the time Guyger killed Jean, she was a white, Dallas police… person.

There’s the rub.

Amber Guyger is a cute, petite, female. She had no business working as a policeman. That’s the significance of this case to me.

Gugyger had just worked a 13 ½ hour shift. She lived in a building where each resident had a parking spot in the parking garage on the same level of his apartment. Guyger was exhausted, and parked on the wrong floor. She lived on the third floor, and Bothem Jean lived on the fourth. He was sitting in front of his TV, eating ice cream, with his door ajar.

Guyger entered “her” apartment, saw a strange black man sitting in her living room and, thinking him a burglar, shot him dead.

Guyger killed Jean because she was a fatigued, white female.

Back during the early-to-mid 1990s, Jim Dwyer, who had developed the nation’s first subway column at New York Newsday (1985-1995), he recounted research that had found that when subway motormen work double shifts (16 hours), they develop sluggishness in their hand-eye coordination and decision-making abilities like that of someone who is intoxicated.

For its part, the Pentagon determined that the average man not only has 81.8% more upper-body strength than the average woman, but much more foot speed and physical stamina, as well. (All of which had been known to mankind for app. 500,000 years before there ever was a Pentagon, but never mind.)

In the wake of the court-ordered hiring of police persons, we have learned that police persons have much itchier trigger fingers than policemen. That’s because they know, in their heart of hearts, that they are in situations that they are unfit to handle with anything short of lethal force.

Amber Guyger had two mental lapses: When she parked on the wrong floor, and when she shot Bothem Jean dead.

Should she have been charged with murder? No. Murder requires mens rea (bad intent), which was absent in this case. She should have been charged with voluntary manslaughter (Man I). With that said, I have no problem with her getting ten years. In many jurisdictions, you can get up to 30 years for Man I, and Guyger will be eligible for parole after five years.

In my opinion, Guyger earned her sentence. However, she should be sharing a cell with the mental incompetent who hired her, and the judge or politician (but I repeat myself), who decreed that we must pay for unfit police persons.

But instead of having an honest discussion about the hiring of police persons, we’re going to continue having a phony monologue, with some of the loudest voices being the supporters of hiring the unfit as police, about the fake problem of “racist” white policemen. (Black supremacists have for generations lived off the support of white feminists, and often the majority of black cops in a jurisdiction are female, because so many black men are convicted felons.)

The black supremacist screamers, including Bothem Jean’s mother, Allison Jean, and her corrupt attorney, Benjamin Crump, demand that police be “re-trained.” That’s a racist code phase for inculcating racial passivity and cowardice in white police, such that they will never draw their weapons on blacks. (Of course, this has already been done for years, but too few white cops have gone meekly to the slaughter.) The purpose of this strategy is simple: To make it possible for black (and brown) felons to murder white police at will.

Mrs. Jean asserted, “If this was applied in the way that it ought to have been taught, my son would have been alive today. If Amber Guyger was trained not to shoot in the heart, my son would be standing here today.”

Where should policemen be trained to shoot bad guys? In the foot? And what about all the civilian deaths such a foolish policy would entail? Mrs. Jean is an imbecile.

Another female black supremacist was also present for the sentencing, Dee Crane.

“Gathered outside the courtroom, activists shocked by the sentence began chanting, ‘No justice, no peace.’

“Dee Crane, the mother of Tavis Crane, a young black man who was fatally shot by an Arlington police officer in 2017, cried as she asked: ‘How many of us does it take to get justice?’

“‘What about my son? What about Botham Jean?’ Crane said through tears. ‘How many of us is it going to take before you understand that our lives matter?’”

Tavis Crane got perfect justice. He was a fugitive felon who twice sought to murder a white police person when she sought to arrest him on multiple felony and misdemeanor warrants. He rammed her car, ran her down going backwards, and then ran over her again going forward, leaving her with many broken bones. A backup policeman jumped in an open door in Crane’s car and shot him dead.

In letting Dee Crane misrepresent the death of her son, Dallas Morning News operatives Jennifer Emily, Dana Branham, LaVendrick Smith and their editors were smuggling their support for failed, racist, would-be cop-killer Tavis Crane into the story.

Atheist activists are also on the job, and have already made a formal ethics complaint against the trial judge, State District Judge Tammy Kemp, for hugging the convict, giving Guyger her personal Bible, and saying something about her Christian faith, after Guyger had been convicted. (During the hug shared by Brandt Jean and Guyger during Jean’s victim impact statement, Judge Kemp reportedly wiped away a tear.) One of the atheists’ complaints was that Judge Kemp had violated the “separation of church and state.” Except that no such separation exists in the U.S. Constitution.

“Austin solo practitioner Lillian Hardwick, an expert on judicial ethics in the Lone Star State, said that Kemp’s conduct is the type of thing that could draw a sanction.

[In calling Hardwick “an expert on judicial ethics in the Lone Star State,” Law.com operative Angela Morris is trying to counterfeit an opinion—her support of Hardwick’s politics—into a statement of fact.]

“‘They are not the actions of an impartial judge,’ Hardwick said.”

Wrong. Judicial partiality would only have been a factor, if Judge Kemp had favored one side, based on its Christian faith, while being biased against the other side for being non-Christian, agnostic, or atheist. But that wasn’t a factor in this trial. (Actually, the bench is lousy with openly biased jurists, but since they are openly homosexual, or black supremacists, or feminists, instead of receiving sanctions, they receive awards.)

Judge Kemp, who is black, also hugged Mrs. Jean. This judge is an equal opportunity hugger-mugger. She had also permitted the victim’s brother, 18-year-old Brandt Jean, to hug his brother’s killer. Had Judge Kemp hugged a convicted black murderer, the same figures now condemning her would be cheering, and bestowing awards on her.