What I think is going on here is that the Obama DOJ, as run by racist criminal generals Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch, were using “reviews” on local, white-run police departments, as a tool for destroying them (e.g., Ferguson). Note the language from the white cop-hating Post and Courier, which assumes that the feds will recommend of any PD they are investigating that it be taken over by the feds (“consent decree”) and dismantled.
White North Charleston Mayor Keith Summey and Police Chief Eddie Driggers thought they’d outsmart Obama’s racist feds, by asking for such an investigation up front, as if the black supremacists would then go easy on them. Fat chance.
The investigation was carried out by the DOJ’s Office of Community Oriented Policing Service (COPS), which under Obama performed a kinder, gentler form of evisceration of law enforcement than the old-fashioned consent decree.
The demands by black supremacists that the DOJ COPS review of the North Charleston PD be released, are in order to be able to attack the department, Trump, and Sessions with Obama’s racist propaganda.
Feds deny request for report on North Charleston police, but senator joins growing calls for release
• By Andrew Knapp aknapp@postandcourier.com
• Oct 20, 2017 Updated 3 hrs ago
• Post & Courier
The Justice Department has denied an open-records request for a report about North Charleston police despite an intensifying chorus of voices from South Carolina and Washington calling for its release.
In rejecting The Post and Courier's inquiry, the federal government said it was sticking to its "commitment to respecting local law enforcement," even though local law enforcement had asked for the report in the first place. The agency plans to hold on to 601 pages that memorialize work by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, a decision that rankled those who sought the reform measure after a police officer shot Walter Scott to death.
The newspaper has appealed, but some locals said the response is a “slap in the face” and raises public suspicion of what the records contain.
Though some leaders are still pushing for the report, Mayor Keith Summey was silent about whether he would seek from the Department of Justice what he and his police chief had first asked for. But Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., this week penned a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who had essentially disbanded the COPS Collaborative Reform Initiative last month.
"North Charleston residents and elected officials continue to be very interested in receiving the results of the COPS Office's already conducted assessment ... regardless of your recent announcement," the senator told Sessions in the Wednesday letter. "I ... urge you to release any final or near final findings and recommendations."
City Councilman Bob King said North Charleston has invested too much time in the effort to walk away now.
"They ought to release it," King said. "The Department of Justice did the city of North Charleston an injustice by cutting us off."
Many neighborhood leaders also have joined forces to demand the taxpayer-funded report.
"It's not being respectful to law enforcement. It's being disrespectful to the community as a whole," said the Rev. Clinton Brantley, pastor of St. Matthew Baptist Church. "It makes me think they have something to hide."
Before Sessions ended the program, federal officials said the assessment was being finalized. Its near-completion buoyed hopes that the documents would still be made public under the federal Freedom of Information Act, potentially handing advocates and a police advisory commission a helpful blueprint for change.
But that won't happen — at least not yet.
The COPS unit won't willingly divulge the information, FOIA officer Chaun Eason said, because of a legal exception allowing it to withhold certain communications used in a "deliberative process." The agency's refocused mission under Sessions also prevents a discretionary release, Eason said.
"Consistent with the attorney general’s commitment to respecting local law enforcement control and accountability," Eason said in an email, "the COPS Office will no longer be issuing Collaborative Reform assessment reports."
'Pressure' on city officials
Walter Scott, a black man, was pulled over by patrolman Michael Slager in April 2015, one in a long line of minor traffic stops thought to target minority communities. After a struggle, the officer said he fired in self-defense when Scott grabbed his Taser.
But an eyewitness video showed Slager shooting eight times as Scott ran away. Slager pleaded guilty earlier this year to a federal crime and is awaiting sentencing.
Amid calls for a sweeping civil rights investigation of the whole North Charleston Police Department, Summey and Police Chief Eddie Driggers asked the Justice Department a year after the shooting for a less confrontational agreement. The COPS program agreed to review police policies and procedures and suggest changes.
But in keeping with President Donald Trump's own principles, Sessions abandoned such reform measures in mid-September, and agency officials said they no longer expected to do "wide-ranging assessments" of local police or complete ones they had already started.
The Post and Courier's request for documents already created by the Justice Department turned up 606 pages, the agency said. The department, though, handed over only five: the letter from Summey and Driggers asking for the COPS probe; it already was public.
First Amendment expert Jay Bender of Columbia, a lawyer for the newspaper, said it's unlikely that the agency would seriously rethink its decision now.
"We have an attorney general that believes cops can do no wrong and a president who encourages cops to beat up people in custody," Bender said. "There's not going to be any evaluation by the DOJ that suggests impropriety at a police department."
The agency also denied a similar FOIA request from the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, said Monique Dixon, deputy director of policy at the New York-based civil rights organization.
"We’re encouraging folks in North Charleston to pressure city officials to ask for the report," she said. "If they really want that document, the officials can push for it."
'Slap in the face'
Summey has expressed disappointment that the federal authorities were "backing away from their commitment," but he has not strongly pressed for the report's release.
A new written agreement with the COPS office, which the council's Public Safety Committee approved Thursday, allows the city to draw "technical assistance" from the federal agency, but it provides no details about the effort expected to run through August. Driggers said at the committee meeting that he will visit with COPS officials in Washington, D.C., on Oct. 30 "to affirm our commitment ... and to set the steps to move forward."
The mayor and his spokesman refused to answer questions asked by The Post and Courier in multiple phone calls and emails. A police representative also did not respond to requests.
Meanwhile, the North Charleston Citizens’ Advisory Commission on Community-Police Relations is developing its own recommendations for the police force, but it had viewed the COPS report as an important step toward that end. Its chairman, Keon Rhodan, said the group is disappointed now but optimistic for an eventual release.
"The report definitely would help," he said, "but there are other tools that we can use to help bring about change we need."
Vice Chairman Daniel O'Neal said he thought the Justice Department had contradicted its own vow to promote local accountability for police.
"I feel like this decision is a slap in the face," he said. "It makes me wonder what exactly is in the report that they don't want the citizens of North Charleston to know."
Reach Andrew Knapp at 843-937-5414. Follow him on Twitter @offlede.
1 comment:
"After a struggle, the officer said he fired in self-defense when Scott grabbed his Taser."
Scott tried to use the taser on the cop thinking it was a firearm. Did not know how to use the taser but he did have intent. when you see the taser holstered it does resemble a handgun.
Post a Comment