How Anti-Semites Invent Evidence

By Nicholas Stix


schrub says [on Steve Sailer’s blog]
September 18, 2017 at 4:37 p.m. GMT

People still don’t seem to realize just how close the University of Virginia lacrosse case came to having a totally different outcome. The salvation of the lacrosse team member was due almost exclusively due to the fact that one of the team members was Jewish and from a well to do and prominent family. It was only after individual Jews and Jewish organizations banded together to apply pressure to make sure that this one Jewish kid had a fair hearing that the case started to fall apart. When this happened, groups like the previously “concerned” ADL and SPLC suddenly seemed to lose interest in it. The media also suddenly became more cautious.

The parents of the gentile players in this fiasco were simply deer in the headlights, totally incapable of applying similar pressure. But another, entirely different scenario could have evolved. If ALL of the lacrosse team members had simply been gentiles, groups like the Anti Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center wouldn’t have come under pressure to call off their attack dogs in the MSM. Instead they would have continued to use these puppets to continue to push to convict these team members in the media well before their actual trials.

If one of the team members hadn’t have been Jewish the case would have swiftly descended into yet another media circus just like all of the other carefully scripted events that the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center have had a hand in.

Without this one Jewish member, the prosecution of this case would have continued and the now “media convicted” gentile lacrosse members would have ended up having to face “show trials” before carefully chosen, most likely urban, maybe all black, juries similar to the O.J. Simpson “show trial” before it.

In addition, these trials, just like “show trials” historically, would also have been most likely have been overseen by a carefully chosen judge or judges as well. (History shows that the ADL never leaves anything this valuable to chance). Author David Irving was actually naive enough to think he would ever be judged impartially during his heavily publicized libel trial. (He wasn’t0.)

These gentile players simply wouldn’t of had a chance regardless of their innocence.

They would most likely have been convicted and would now be rotting in a definitely NOT “country club prison” right now to make examples of them to their similarly “vile gentile counterparts”.

I hope that these lacrosse players thank god every day that one of the one of their members happened to be Jewish. He alone saved their asses.


Art Deco says:
September 18, 2017 at 5:53 pm GMT • 200 Words
@schrub

There was no accusation against the UVa lacrosse team. It was the Duke lacrosse team. None of the accused players were Jewish (two were Catholic and fairly observant Catholic for ‘a that). I was a participant at the time in a forum which included an DC attorney who claimed to know Rae Evans, also a DC attorney and the mother of one of the accused. He says, “If I know Rae Evans, she will see to it that he [Michael Nifong] is squashed like a bug”. The Finnerty family is wealthy enough to build buildings for institutions. The Seligmann family was likely the most impecunious of the trio but still quite well-to-do (before legal bills cleaned them out). Michael Nifong filed bogus criminal charges against one family whose style would not be cramped by losing a million bucks and another family whose matriarch knows the system quite well. When Rae Evans said to the interviewer, “Mr. Nifong, you picked on the wrong people,” ’twas not bravado.


Jack D says:
September 18, 2017 at 7:47 pm GMT
@Art Deco

Maybe schzlub thinks that Seligmann is a Jewish name? We really need a better class of anti-Semite – like the Cambridge don played by John Gielgud who puts down Harold Abrams in plummy tones in Chariots of Fire. Instead we get Larry the Cable Guy in a trucker hat.