Thursday, September 20, 2018

Video: Want a Break from the Tawana Brawley Hoax, and from Sweating Out Jake deGrom’s Hunt for the Cy Young Award? Let’s Go to the Dogs!

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix



5 comments:

Anonymous said...

The new target--same as the old target--"OLD WHITE MEN."
IT's the same target of the left that has been in the crossfire for at least two years now,an agist,racist talking point/agenda that seeks to denigrate white men in general,but OLD white men in particular and reduce them to being a non-factor or worse,a non-person.
The SCOTUS sham has reopened the attack on white men,with liberals describing us as a cross between disgusting,obsolete and unnecessary(and we BUILT THIS COUNTRY!)
Amazingly,the last two hateful,verbal assaults,this week were by WHITE WOMEN!!!
Add Joy Behar to the list that includes Nicole Wallace,Sarah Jeong and Ana Navarro (these last two foreigners may have been the ones responsible for re-igniting the attacks on white men).
Why Behar/Wallace would join in and openly speak with such hatred of fellow whites is way above my paygrade--or Sigmund Freuds.It's as if these white women want us wiped off the planet.The OLD white men they really despise--in the Senate--are getting an enhanced slanderous attack.
Behar:"Not only are those Senators,who are deciding if Ms.Ford will have her say,white men--they are OLD white men."
Wallace:"You cannot get away from the image that the ones deciding who runs our country--are white men."
Since when are white men garbage?
Does Behar/Wallace understand the fact that their FATHERS are white?Do they hate their old,white fathers?Hmm,maybe Freud COULD get somewhere with them.
I can only repeat:If they get their wish to have white men removed from power,where do you think white WOMEN would wind up in a black/Mex/Arab controlled United States?
If they're fortunate,they could look forward to a menu of daily rape,torture and finally being murdered.WTF are they thinking?
This all takes place after a flurry of older white men were forced out from many top jobs in the last 12-24 months.It's all connected.
At the rate this is going,it will be open season on white men-especially with white women joining in to disparage their own race.
It must be stopped.Does anyone have any suggestions?
--GR Anonymous--I'm a white man

Anonymous said...

And another white traitor:Insulting his own race.Why?

John Garamendi
John Garamendi
@RepGaramendi
I stand with Dr. Ford. White men in control of the Senate Judiciary Committee are showing they will work tirelessly to turn the accuser into the accused. Dr. Ford deserves an FBI investigation into her allegations, and Americans should demand more from their elected leaders.
--GRA

Anonymous said...

Kavanaugh look-a-like may have done it
Zerohedge
A new theory has emerged in the case of whether Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted accuser Christine Blasey Ford roughly 35 years ago; it was Kavanaugh's high school look-alike, whose high school house better fits Ford's description, and who kept in touch with the other guy allegedly in the room, Mark Judge.

The theory was presented Thursday afternoon by Ed Whelan, a former clerk to USSC Justice Antonin Scalia and currently president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), a conservative think tank. Using entirely circumstantial evidence which could certainly ruin the life of the man at the center of the new theory, Whelan suggests that Kavanaugh's high school doppelgänger, Chris Garrett, may have in fact been responsible for Blasey Ford's recollection of the alleged incident.




Brett Kavanaugh (left), Chris Garrett
Earlier this week, Whelan tweeted "By one week from today, I expect that Judge Kavanaugh will have been clearly vindicated on this matter. Specifically, I expect that compelling evidence will show his categorical denial to be truthful. There will be no cloud over him."
--GRA

Nicholas said...

"Kavanaugh look-a-like may have done it"

GRA,

That's assuming there was an "it."

Nicholas said...

"Kavanaugh look-a-like may have done it"

GRA,

That's assuming there was an "it."