The website Heavy.com posted the above and below photos of Ford, claiming that the top one was from her 1983 school yearbook, and the one below is from her 1984 school yearbook. The top picture looks to me to be of a girl of at most 13 years of age, but the lower picture looks to be of a woman of 35-40 years of age. She's got lines in her throat, for cryin' out loud!
In case you think I'm exaggerating Ford's age in the lower pic, The Boss, a woman of [censored] years of age, always judges women to be older than I do.
By An Old Buddy
[N.S.: I shortened the article below, by cutting out a passage that appeared twice.]
Professor accusing Kavanaugh is radical SJW with some damning student reviews
By Selwyn Duke
September 17, 2018
It's true that Bill Clinton's liberal '90s apologists justified his sexual misconduct with the claim "character doesn't matter." It nonetheless does, and since Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hopes are being influenced by accusations that may speak to his character, it's only fair to examine the character of his accuser. This woman, Palo Alto University psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford, is
a radical social justice warrior with some damning student reviews – including one from a person who wrote, "I am honestly scared of her."
Ford's accusation goes back to her high school days, in approximately 1982, when she would have been 15 and Kavanaugh 17. She claims that Kavanaugh lay on top of her and groped her while heavily intoxicated and that the incident ended when a friend of his, Mark Judge, jumped on both of them, sending them all tumbling (you can read a more thorough account here).
Whatever the truth of the matter, however, certainly true is that Ford is a radical leftist who'd be inclined to zealously oppose a Kavanaugh nomination. For example, Breitbart reports that she not only has attended anti-Trump events, but actually donned a pink "brain brain p---- hat" for a 2017 anti-Trump march.
Just as telling may be her student reviews. Consider the following screen grab of one of her reviews (now scrubbed) from the popular site Rate My Professors:
Given that many people enter psychology to, at least in part, remedy their own problems, that there could be "something wrong with her" wouldn't make Ford unusual.Some bad reviews were posted just Sunday, after Ford's identity was revealed. They generally have no detail, and it's safe to assume they were posted for political reasons (and Rate My Professors has been removing them).
There are a couple of other older "Awful" reviews, as well as two students rating Ford "Average" and a pair labeling her "Awesome." Yet even one of the latter – after saying that while the professor is not that "personable," he'd "enjoy taking her for another course in the future" – warns, "Stay on her good side though..." Why would this be necessary? An ethical teacher doesn't let personal animus influence the way students are treated.
But perhaps what a woman named Rebecca Diserio posted to Twitter Sunday explains the problem. She wrote, "Both of my sons had her [Ford] at CSF....my son who just became a Deputy Sheriff (LA County) said 'She's crazy.' Harped & attacked kids who argued for conservative values...both my sons withdrew from her class after two weeks...her bias was way worse than most SJW professors."
So has Kavanaugh gotten on Ford's bad side by expressing conservative ideas? Probably. And even if her allegations are true, I very much doubt she'd have come forward had Kavanaugh stayed on her good side by being a leftist reprobate in the mold of Slick Willie or Chappaquiddick Ted Kennedy. For a good example of such situational sexual mores, note that liberal reporter Nina Burleigh actually said in 1998 about B. Clinton, "I'd be happy to give him [oral sex] just to thank him for keeping abortion legal."
As for Kavanaugh, unless it's shown that he's like Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy and has exhibited a pattern of sexual wrongdoing, there's nothing to see here. Ford claims that the 36-year-old alleged incident of sexual misconduct took place in a room with only her and the two boys present. So while 65 women who knew Kavanaugh in high school have come forward to vouch for his character as a gentleman, Ford's lone word is the only claim against him. Heck, there are more testimonials as to Ford's alleged insanity than there are regarding Kavanaugh's alleged impropriety.
6 comments:
Questions about Ford
Will she have the chutzpah to go before the Senate and commit perjury?Is she THAT far gone?Who is coaching her?
I'm convinced that she's a wackjob,but wackjobs don't know that they're wackjobs,so she could go through with it.If proven wrong,what will be her penalty as a professor? How about being forced to teach at Oral Roberts University for 2 years..lol--speaking of oral.
--GR Anonymous
jerry pdx
I wondered about the 2nd man named in the story, Mark Judge. The first brief media mentions made it sound like he helped her escape Kavanaugh but her more detailed account claims that he was also drunk and boorishly egging Kavanaugh on and then in some kind of wild orgiastic impulse leaped on the bed, causing them to break apart and Ford to escape. If find this part of the story to be strange. I'd be curious to hear her first version of the story, stories like this can morph and change, I read one where she said Judge leaped on them, which is weird because hetero men don't "jump" on other men, I don't care how drunk they are. Plus, if he jumped on both of them I think it would have been damaging to her physically, I doubt she'd be in any kind of shape to escape at that moment.
Here is an exceprt from "The Weekly Standard" article:
The Kavanaugh classmate quoted in the New Yorker is Mark Judge, a writer in Washington, D.C. Judge spoke to THE WEEKLY STANDARD Friday afternoon, strongly denying that any such incident ever occurred. “It’s just absolutely nuts. I never saw Brett act that way,” Judge told TWS.
Here is an analysis of the article from WS on Hotair.com: https://hotair.com/archives/2018/09/15/mark-judge-undermining-friend-brett-kavanaugh/
Mr. Judge initially said he couldn't remember the incident which some say is suspicious because it's a boilerplate denial but then he followed up with the above is still a denial but maybe leaves the possibility he saw something but not what she
A few things occur to me. First off, if two young athletic young men want to keep a girl in a bedroom (at least one, Kavanaugh played on the JV basketball team so he was no weakling), they can, so they must not have been trying very hard to keep her captive.
She was awful skimpy on the details about why she was in that room, all I've been able to find is that they somehow cornered her in there. Omission of those kind of details is always suspicious.
After this "incident" she needs years of therapy, has relationship issues with men and is scarred for life. Sound familiar? That reciting of lifelong trauma that can never be overcome is a standard tactic for feminists, no matter how long ago it happened or minor the incident.
There is nothing more important than getting the right judges on the Supreme Court, especially for the future of immigration in this country, the President can't change laws himself which limits what he can do, but if we can get judges that aren't secretly diversity fanatics into office, then maybe some of these insane and antiquated immigration laws can be changed into something more rational and realistic. However, there are forces that also realize this so a Trump nominee being accused of a #MeToo act by an SJW fanatic at this key moment is just too coincidental to be true.
"character doesn't matter."
Billy Graham even had the nerve to say this fellow southern "good old boy" was a vigorous man.
KAVANAUGH/FORD INSANITY SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY
(ZH)Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and the woman accusing him of sexual crimes will both testify next Monday over her accusation that he sexually assaulted her while they were teenagers in high school.
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), a member of the Judiciary Committee, confirmed that the public hearing will happen on Monday, September 24. It is unclear whether the vote to confirm Kavanaugh has been delayed, or if the vote will still occur and the testimony will happen anyway. We assume the former.
Kavanaugh's accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, has a hazy recollection of the incident, admitting she doesn't specifically remember the year it happened, where the incident occurred, whose house it was, how she got there, and whether Kavanaugh and a witness (who denies the account) were already upstairs when she went up, and how she got home that night.
The announcement of next Monday's testimonies comes after several closed door meetings by Republican members of the panel, with Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) saying: "As I said earlier, anyone who comes forward as Dr. Ford has done deserves to be heard. My staff has reached out to Dr. Ford to hear her account, and they held a follow-up call with Judge Kavanaugh this afternoon. Unfortunately, committee Democrats have refused to join us in this effort. However, to provide ample transparency, we will hold a public hearing Monday to give these recent allegations a full airing."
As The Hill notes, Monday's hearing is sure to be a total circus.
GRA:Correct--and to make the circus atmosphere even more authentic,taking the place of Democrat and Republican committe members at this hearing,actual donkeys and elephants will be brought in to ask questions and shit up the floor.The amount of shit on the floor and the number of unintelligible questions asked,will be similar to the group of Senators that normally sit there.
--GR Anonymous
"Some bad reviews were posted just Sunday, after Ford's identity was revealed. They generally have no detail, and it's safe to assume they were posted for political reasons (and Rate My Professors has been removing them)."
Meanwhile Brett comitts perjury: https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/09/28/the-record-supports-christine-blasey-ford/
But facts don't matt matt be she is an sjw, right?
You admit that but they say they must be accurate? Wow. Talk about two-faced.
First off the record supports her: https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/09/28/the-record-supports-christine-blasey-ford/
Second rate my professor is unreliable: http://thedailyaztec.com/74931/opinion/dont-always-depend-on-rate-my-professors-when-choosing-classes/
https://georgiastatesignal.com/decent-dishonest-need-know-rate-professors/
Finally who is this Twitter mother, and she provide evidence for her claims?
This is nothing more than character asassination. The author is no journalist, but a pundit, as are you Stix
If anything, Brett committed perjury: https://abovethelaw.com/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-perjured-himself-impeachment/
Post a Comment