Video of Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake’s 2004 Super Bowl Publicity Stunt

[“Did Justin Timberlake rape Janet Jackson? hollywood reporter hoaxer Sophie Lloyd cancels Timberlake, and rewrites history to make it seem as if he had sexually molested Jackson.”]

Re-posted by N.S.

[I don’t know if you’ll be able to see this. When I tried to view it, youtube blocked me, saying it was because I had an adblocker, but when I hit the disable symbol, nothing changed. Is this a youtube trick, to get me to pay for a subscription? In any event, I saw the stunt during the super bowl halftime show, and remember it vividly.]

If, like so many of the liars (like @LJStability) on this thread insist, “It’s literally nothing,” then why are you still upset, 19 years later? It’s a very big deal to YOU!

@LJStability
10 months ago

@LJStability It's so wild that people got so upset with this incident. It's literally nothing. So sad that her career was affected by something that really shouldn't matter

@LJStability “It’s so wild that people got so upset with this incident. It’s literally nothing. So sad that her career was affected by something that really shouldn’t matter”

You’re literally stupid, you’re literally a liar, and you’re literally an English language abuser.

It was a very big deal to Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake, which is why they planned and practiced it. They were hoping for maximum publicity, and they got it. However, they did not expect to be so widely criticized for it. She wanted it to affect her career, but in a positive way.

To the liars on this thread: It was not an accident; it was planned and practiced.

It was not a “wardrobe malfunction.” The velcro strap was there, in order to permit Justin Timberlake do exactly what he did.

Janet Jackson was not “blacklisted” over it.

It was not “nothing,” or you wouldn’t still be upset about it, almost 20 years later.