Sunday, August 25, 2024

"we are not a serious country because, as a democracy, we do not have serious voters"

By An Old Friend
sent: sunday, august 25, 2024 at 09:23:52 p.m. edt

subject: "We are not a serious country because, as a democracy, we do not have serious voters." The quote in my subject line comes from the brief piece below by John Hinderaker. His three-sentence closing paragraph would be worth emblazoning on many prominent walls. And it reminds me of this tidbit from Mark Steyn in 2010:

The election of Barack Obama was a fundamentally unserious act by the U.S. electorate, and you can't blame the world's mischief-makers, from Putin to Ahmadinejad to the many Gitmo recidivists now running around Yemen, from drawing the correct conclusion.



https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/08/the-devil-and-the-deep-blue-sea.php

august 25, 2024 By John Hinderaker

"the devil and the

deep blue sea

"one of my neighbors has a sign in their yard that says 'support women! vote for dems.' I am sure they think this makes some kind of sense. they care about something–abortion, I suppose–but they apparently don't care about the border, our economy, the national debt or the national defense. you know, the things that government actually is responsible for.

"pretty much every day there are news stories that prompt this bitter reflection, but for now, see this Fox news story: 'navy to sideline 17 vessels due to manpower shortage.

"the navy will reportedly sideline 17 vessels due to a manpower shortage that makes it difficult to properly crew and operate ships across the fleet.

"there just aren't enough merchant marines to keep all the ships going at once, according to rear admiral (ret.) Mark Montgomery, senior director of the center on cyber and technology innovation for the foundation for defense of democracy [sic], told Fox news digital. merchant marines operate the many support vessels needed to keep the navy running.

"'the problem, of course, is the ships are at sea, away from home port 12 months of the year,' Montgomery said. 'so you need two crews … we're desperately short of the number of people.

"the navy has in process something called the 'great reset,' which sounds ominous. meanwhile, china has significantly more, and newer, ships than we do, and they are unlikely to have recruitment issues. they are making a play for control of the pacific, and if any member of the democratic party cares, I haven't seen evidence of it.

"speaking of the age of our fleet:

"'the average age of the ships in the reserve force is about 45 years old,' Montgomery said. 'bBetween 20 and 30 years is fine, because you don't have the same issues of modernization of weapon systems and big changes in electrical power distribution … but 17 of the ships are over 50 years old.'

"recruitment is a problem across the service branches:

"the U.S. military has suffered some recruiting problems over the past few years, most notably in the army, which had to cut its force by 24,000 – roughly 5% of jobs – in 2024 to account for recruiting shortfalls.

"I don't know, just hazarding a wild guess here, but maybe the sorts of people who are likely to sign up for the military aren't interested in serving under a manchurian president. or under a four-star admiral who is a man posing as a woman named Rachel.

"we are not a serious country because, as a democracy, we do not have serious voters. autocracies like china and russia have many disadvantages compared to us, but in the present historical moment, they are nowhere near as stupid as we are. one trembles for the future."

N.S.: We are not, and have never been, a democracy. We were founded as a constitutional republic, and have never officially changed that.



5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Only Whites are not serious--black,spics and towelheads are VERY serious.

--GRA

David In TN said...

I have been thinking along these lines for some time now. As GRA says, it is Whites who are not serious.

Several decades ago, Obama, Biden, Harris, and Trump would not have been considered serious presidential candidates.

Anonymous said...

Try reading the comments over at ZeroHedge. The latest fad is fawning over RFK Jr. because he decided to support Trump. I pointed out that he wants reparations for blacks in order to atone for "racism," and provided a link to that information. The response was unanimous disapproval and vile invective. I added that he called the NRA "a terrorist group," and got more negativity. These are your voters- suggesting RFK would be great for Trump's cabinet!
The average American at this point is a drug-addled moron.

=RM

Anonymous said...

Agree,R.M.--I pointed out RFK's viewpoint,since he decided reparations were "the solution,"months ago. I could never have voted for him.

--GRA

Anonymous said...

I think there are more commies on ZH commenting than conservatives--a change from even three years ago. Whether conservatives have been banned,is the reason--I don't know.I'm not on ZH,btw. On the race stories they post,I get a lot of laughs usually,from the comments

--GRA