Wednesday, December 04, 2013

Walter Williams: Blacks and Obama

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

I posted three comments at Town Hall about this column, and in response to a Republican.

1. First of all, as I have said since 1/20/09, I do not see “Obama” ever voluntarily leaving the White House. Second, I do not see electing a black president as a legitimate option. Colin Powell was supposedly the ideal black public figure, and I was ready to vote for him in 1996, had he not chickened out. What a mistake that would have been. The man turned out to be a treacherous, affirmative action racist, and had been an incompetent in the Army, who had to be bailed out by Republicans. As another reader remarked, every city that a black has run, he has into the ground. And those cities were not going downhill, until they were swamped with blacks.

2. With all due respect to Walter Williams, I think it was a mistake integrating the big leagues. The forced “integration” of society (including Brown v. Board of Education), and the apartheid system of Jim Snow that arose from it, would not have come to pass without Jackie Robinson. By the way, Robinson then leveraged his baseball career into a public career as an affirmative action, black power Republican (as strange as that sounds).

Number three was in response to a brain-dead Republican reader.

TLG62 Wrote: 16 minutes ago (8:28 AM)

Race is not destroying race-relations, the faux victimhood culture is, the degenerate culture is, the government dependency culture is, the “not my fault” culture is, and the people without self-value, integrity, and personal responsibility is.

All these things that are causing the failure are being brought to you by the liberal ideology because they want to be your savior and take control of your life.

You can’t fix something if there is not a problem, so liberals produce the problems.


N.S.: So, we should look at race relations in a race-blind fashion? Thus, we could have a society which was composed 100 percent of blacks, and it would function just as well as America did, circa 1950, as long as it had the right ideology. Detroit was run by liberal Democrats for generations, and did just fine. You are apparently unaware that you are a self-caricature of a deluded Republican. I don’t who is worse, racial socialists like Obama, or brain-dead Republicans like you.

I have no idea if the thread Nazis left my comments up.
 

Blacks and Obama
By Walter E. Williams
December 4, 2013
Town Hall

In a March 2008 column, I criticized pundits' concerns about whether America was ready for Barack Obama, suggesting that the more important issue was whether black people could afford Obama. I proposed that we look at it in the context of a historical tidbit.

In 1947, Jackie Robinson, after signing a contract with the Brooklyn Dodgers organization, broke the color barrier in Major League Baseball. He encountered open racist taunts and slurs from fans, opposing team players and even some members of his own team. Despite that, his batting average was nearly .300 in his first year. He led the National League in stolen bases and won the first Rookie of the Year award. There's no sense of justice that requires a player be as good as Robinson in order to have a chance in the major leagues, but the hard fact of the matter is that as the first black player, he had to be.

In 1947, black people could not afford an incompetent black baseball player. Today we can. The simple reason is that as a result of the excellence of Robinson -- and many others who followed him, such as Satchel Paige, Don Newcombe, Larry Doby and Roy Campanella -- today no one in his right mind, watching the incompetence of a particular black player, could say, "Those blacks can't play baseball."

In that March 2008 column, I argued that for the nation -- but more importantly, for black people -- the first black president should be the caliber of a Jackie Robinson, and Barack Obama is not. Obama has charisma and charm, but in terms of character, values, experience and understanding, he is no Jackie Robinson. In addition to those deficiencies, Obama became the first person in U.S. history to be elected to the highest office in the land while having a long history of associations with people who hate our nation, such as the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama's pastor for 20 years, who preached that blacks should sing not "God bless America" but "God damn America." Then there's Obama's association with William Ayers, formerly a member of the Weather Underground, an anti-U.S. group that bombed the Pentagon, U.S. Capitol and other government buildings. Ayers, in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attack, told a New York Times reporter, "I don't regret setting bombs. ... I feel we didn't do enough."

Obama's electoral success is truly a remarkable commentary on the goodness of the American people. A 2008 NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll reported "that 17 percent were enthusiastic about Obama being the first African American President, 70 percent were comfortable or indifferent, and 13 percent had reservations or were uncomfortable." I'm 77 years old. For almost all of my life, a black's becoming the president of the United States was at best a pipe dream. Obama's electoral success further confirms what I've often held: The civil rights struggle in America is over, and it's won. At one time, black Americans did not have the constitutional guarantees enjoyed by white Americans; now we do. The fact that the civil rights struggle is over and won does not mean that there are not major problems confronting many members of the black community, but they are not civil rights problems and have little or nothing to do with racial discrimination.

There is every indication to suggest that Obama's presidency will be seen as a failure similar to that of Jimmy Carter's.
That's bad news for the nation but especially bad news for black Americans. No white presidential candidate had to live down the disgraced presidency of Carter, but I'm all too fearful that a future black presidential candidate will find himself carrying the heavy baggage of a failed black president. That's not a problem for white liberals who voted for Obama -- they received their one-time guilt-relieving dose from voting for a black man to be president -- but it is a problem for future generations of black Americans. But there's one excuse black people can make; we can claim that Obama is not an authentic black person but, as The New York Times might call him, a white black person.


3 comments:

countenance said...

Jackie Robinson's first game in the major leagues was on April 15, 1947.

The New York and national papers and wire services that evening and the following morning that reported on that game largely stated that fact as an afterthought, deep down into the paragraph count.

We're now supposed to think of that day as a holy day. Funny, nobody back then gave it much of a thought.

Douglas said...

I would bet they will be deleted or you will be heavily voted down. I have been leaving many such comments on Frontpagemag website for a long time. Surprising, i do occasionally get some engaging comments.

I would have expected to be banned from that site by now the way Lawrence Auster was.

AgainstPC said...

What mistake is there to repeal forced segregation ? Do you think the answer to supposed Apartheid is to instigate another Apartheid ? I think it's below contempt to answer racism and discrimination with other racism and discrimination.

As for Detroit it was not run for generations by liberal democrats. In fact a simple look at Wikipedia's page of Detroit's list of mayors shows it was run by a Republican in the years 1905-1906, 1909-1910, 1913-1923, 1924-1930, 1933-1948, 1950-1962. To pretend that all of Detroit's problems come from race is to apply the single-causation fallacy used by those who says it's all due to racism. Appalachia is plagued by dire poverty and this has been going on for decades You think this due to the 'whiteness" of its inhabitants ?