The Mizzou Two Desperados: Sean D. Fitzgerald and Zachary E. TuckerBy Nicholas Stix
[My VDARE exclusive frontpager on the “Mizzou Two” case was just published: “Report from Occupied America: Free the Mizzou Two!” (That’s VDARE’s front page link, which is only good for about 24 hours; thereafter, hit this permalink.) The article's opening follows.]
On April 29, the dangerous Mizzou Two—white ROTC students at University of Missouri Columbia ("Mizzou"), freshman Sean D. Fitzgerald, 19, and senior Zachary E. Tucker, 21—pleaded guilty to littering. They were sentenced to two years of probation, 80 hours of community service, and had to surrender their drivers’ licenses for 60 days.
The foregoing were not typos.
On February 26, numerous cotton balls were found strewn on the ground outside Mizzou’s Black Culture Center. Fitzgerald and Tucker were arrested on felony "tampering" charges. That, too, is not a typo.
"University police say it's too early to say if the incident qualifies as a hate crime, but say they’re looking at surveillance video to find more clues," is also not a typo. [“Mizzou discusses racist display on campus,” KRCG (CBS) 13, March 2, 2010.]
In a statement to the press, University of Missouri Chancellor Brady Deaton denounced the atrocity as "a disheartening and inexcusable act."
"Those guilty of this despicable action have not yet been identified, but MUPD became involved immediately and is conducting an investigation. This university is fully committed to tolerance and respect for every one of its members, and this kind of conduct will not be tolerated at MU."
[This is not a satire. Read the rest here.]
5 comments:
you wrote:
"But racially-motivated blacks and their white leftist allies have sought to impose tyranny on whites ever since the Civil Rights Movement began."
There is nothing LEFTIST about the race based political correctness and the propaganda and police state regime that enforces it. Leftism is about DEMOCRACY, about what the majority wants. The majority wants high wages. The majority of americans in 1970 did not want racial integration. The elite did it any way and they continue to enforce racial integration with this sort of police state regime.
But do not call it LEFTIST, because it is not. Leftism is about the will of the PEOPLE, the majority. The elite want racial integration because it factionalizes and divides the population, weakening voter and worker solidarity. Capital cannot stand against a united Labor.
A Labor divided by racial factions cannot stand against Capital. And that is what we have here in America. A racially integrated nation is a dream come true for the rich investor and business owner. And THAT was the driving force behine the civil rights "movement." And that is the driving force behind what is happening to the Missouri 2.
But do not call it Leftist. Because it is not. Leftism supports the will of the majority. The majority never wanted this. They never wanted racial integration. The rich elite shoved it down our throats.
Leftism is about democracy. This is not about democracy, not about what the majority wants.
You lot at vdare have this incongruity staring you right in the face for years now, and you cannot see it. You keep calling political correctness Leftist. It's not. The majority does not want this. The majority never even wanted racial integration.
This is all about factionalizing the nation, the states, the cities, the neighborhoods, the schools and the workplaces. Factions decrease unity. Less unity means we have less control over our own govt. When we have less control, Capital has more control.
This idea was the very foundation of the federal union--the principle behind the pseudodemocracy that is America. And it is the same principle that underlies the creation of the EU.
But in order to enforce factionalization, the elite need to have powerful laws against TRUE leftism, which is the Missouri 2 were expressing.
You have a lot to learn. I am going to post 2 links below. Read them to get some more idea of what I am talking about.
here is a short 4 page article by Dr Woody Holton to give you a brief intro to some of the basic concepts I discussed above:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa4026/is_200607/ai_n17187913/?tag=content;col1
Here is an online book by Dr Jerry Fresia to fill you in on more from the above link:
http://cyberjournal.org/authors/fresia/
also google Dr Putnam and his BOWLING ALONE research.
It's common for societies to treat crimes differently when committed by or against certain groups. Weregild, for example, varied wildly depending on social class. The USA in 2010 deems Blacks' blood to be sweeter than ours, we all know it, and there's not a damned thing to be done about it.
I read the VDare article that you linked to at: http://vdare.com/lodge/100303_diversity.htm
re the UCSD "hate" crime hoax.
Fascinating stuff.
I was not aware of the truth behind the story until I got it online. A question here: do you think that if enough Americans got the truth about hoax crimes (say, via the Internet), it would lead to a change in things? Or have we gone too far.
This is one more example of how the MSM works as the propaganda front of the multicult. It's also one more demonstration of how the establishment -- universities, media, government -- is on the side of multicultism, yet minority campus activist groups act as if they are somehow under siege from vast forces of "racism."
As James Burnham once noted about liberals and McCarthyism, this sort of thing allows the PC to have all the thrill of non-conformism while being part of a 100% conforming community.
Post a Comment