By N.S.
"rep. Jamaal Bowman broke house ethics rules with fire alarm pull, watchdog says
"rep. Jamaal Bowman (d-ny) broke house ethics rules when he pulled a fire alarm as the lower chamber was rushing a vote to avoid a partial government shutdown last month,..."
https://nypost.com/2023/10/12/rep-jamaal-bowman-broke-house-ethics-rules-by-pulling-fire-alarm-conservative-watchdog-says/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I'm shocked he didn't set a fire to go with it.Shocked,I tell you.
--GRA
As if Jaamal even cares, he is chuckling about the whole thing
But he says it was accidental, lying of course but dems will say they believe him, lying of course, repubs will do what? Try to get him censured in some way? Will they vote on it? It's already done, I suspect he gets away with it.
SUSPENSIONS FOR CALIFORNIA STUDENTS' BAD BEHAVIOR(SHORT OF MURDER) TO BE OUTLAWED
(ZH)It will be illegal for California public schools to suspend students for disrupting class or defying teachers—known as willful defiance suspensions—starting July 1, 2024.
“With Governor Newsom’s signing of SB 274, California is putting the needs of students first,” bill author Sen. Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley) said in a statement a day after the governor’s signing Oct. 8. “No more kicking kids out of school for minor disruptions. Students belong in school where they can succeed.”
(GRA:I say violent crime will explode in school when this is implemented )
A class at Stark Elementary School in Stamford, Conn., on March 10, 2021. (John Moore/Getty Images)
SB 274—an extension of the author's previous legislation from 2019 that banned willful defiance suspensions for TK–5 students permanently and for grades 6–8 until 2025—now broadens such policy to include all public-school grades from TK–12 across the state, with a sunset date of July 1, 2029.
Traditionally, willful defiance suspensions have been imposed on students for disrupting school activities, including wearing hats backward, nodding off in class, using bad language in school, or engaging in verbal disagreements with teachers, Ms. Skinner's office said in the statement.
Under the new law, teachers can remove a student from class for unruly behavior, but the youth would not be suspended from school. Instead, school administrators would be responsible for evaluating and implementing suitable in-school interventions or support for the student, according to the senator’s office.
Additionally, the bill prohibits the suspension or expulsion of students due to tardiness or truancy.
“The punishment for missing school should not be to miss more school,” Ms. Skinner said in an earlier press release after the bill passed the California Assembly and Senate.
According to Ms. Skinner, suspending students could potentially lead to them dropping out of school.
“Suspending students, no matter the age, doesn’t improve student behavior, and it greatly increases the likelihood that the student will fail or drop out,” she said in the Oct. 9 statement.
Additionally, the senator’s office said that such suspensions have been “disproportionately directed at students of color, LGBTQ students, students who are homeless or in foster care, and those with disabilities.”
(GRA:It isn't disproportiate when certain racial groups commit most of the infractions that gets them suspended.)
.
However, opponents of the bill have said that it would create more chaos in schools.
Davina Keiser, a former teacher with four decades of teaching experience in the Long Beach Unified School District, told The Epoch Times in a previous interview that disruptive behavior was “detrimental to the learning of everybody else in the classroom.”
“It's almost like a license for the rest of the kids to go ahead and misbehave,” she said.
--GRA
It was obvious he broke some kind of rule.
How much government time and money and how many bureaucrats did it take to reach this conclusion?
Post a Comment