Wednesday, March 02, 2022
Did Wisconsin Special Counsel Michael Gableman Call for Decertification of Wisconsin 2020 Election Results?!
[Previously: “BREAKING NEWS: Wisconsin Special Counsel Michael Gableman Calls for Decertification of Wisconsin 2020 Election Results (VIDEO).”]
By Eahilf
Wednesday, March 2, 2022 at 1:55:00 A.M. EST
BREAKING: Wisconsin Special Counsel Michael Gableman Calls for Decertification of Wisconsin 2020 Election Results
Except that’s not exactly what he said – from the article:
Justice Michael Gableman: Our recommendations are fairly predictable considering what we just covered… The elimination of WEC (Wisconsin Election Commission)… At this point, I believe the legislature ought to take a very hard look at the option of decertification of 2020 Wisconsin Presidential Election.
Saying “the legislature ought to take a very hard look at the option of decertification” is not the same as saying flatly the election ought to be decertified – presumably, whether to decertify would depend on the result of “taking a very hard look.”
S--t like this is why “coastal elites” laugh at conservatives and treat them with contempt – and Gateway Pundit is one of the worst sites for it.
The anomalous and suspicious vote-counting in WI should have been investigated and explained – here is a graph of votes vs. time in WI: link
Something similar happened in Michigan – it was never investigated and explained there, either.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
What's to explain?Software was programmed with some kind of algorithm--similar to how the stock market is propped up.The stock market is rigged to a great extent since 2008--controlled by the Fed--all under the umbrella of national security.
Dems control 99% of the technology companies--no Republican would know what was going on if voting software was tampered with.
That's my best guess on the surge in Biden votes in early morning hours--long after polls closed. Those votes should have been counted much earlier,imho.
--GRA
>What's to explain?
Assuming you want to establish, to some standard ('beyond a reasonable doubt') before a formal body with standing (e.g. a court), that fraud occurred to such a degree that the outcome of the election is in question, and therefore de-certification is warranted, then there's a lot to 'explain' -- or prove.
What matters more than that?
>That's my best guess
You need more than hand waving, or a 'best guess', to accomplish that.
So far there has been mostly bellyaching.
But it's also true that election skeptics, even ones producing quantitative evidence of these suspicious election anomalies, were denied their 'day in court' via a propaganda and smear campaign organized and coordinated by the political media industrial complex.
Here is the mentioned time vs vote count graph for Michigan: link
And if the state election results are de-certified, what then? Those electoral votes for Wisconsin that counted for Biden will just be not counted? Enough states do the same and Trump becomes President. Biden becomes an illegimate President.
>And if the state election results are de-certified, what then?
I don't know -- is there any precedent for something like that? -- as was observed at the time, for this and other reasons it's regrettable that cowardly, lazy courts, including SCOTUS justices, ducked these election fraud cases in 2020.
Post a Comment