PayPal

Friday, January 18, 2008

White Supremacy and Plagiarism at CNN

By Nicholas Stix

On May 29, the CNN show, Paula Zahn Now did a story—well, sort of—on the crime I have dubbed the Knoxville Horror. In that January 7, 2007 atrocity, a young white couple—Channon Gail Christian, 21, and Christopher Newsom Jr., 23—were carjacked, kidnapped, both gang-raped, tortured and murdered in Knoxville, Tennessee. Four suspects in the rape-murder and one who is charged with being an accessory after the fact, all of whom are black, are in custody. Defendants Letalvis “Rome” Cobbins, Lemaricus “Slim” Davidson, George Geovonni “Detroit” Thomas and Vanessa Coleman are scheduled to be tried in separate state trials, beginning from May to August. In December, Knox County District Attorney General Randy Nichols announced that he will seek the death penalty for Cobbins, Davidson, Thomas and Coleman. Eric Boyd is charged with having harbored the fugitive Davidson after the slayings, and will be tried in federal court next month as an accessory after the fact to carjacking, which is a federal crime.

I say Paula Zahn Now “sort of” did a story, because guest host Kiran Chetry and reporter Rusty Dornin were not so much reporting on the crime as on the protests against the crime as yet another example of rampant, racially motivated black-on-white violence by what they referred to as “white supremacists.” (I refer to them as “white supremacist/neo-Nazi/whatevers –WS/NN/Ws.)

Reporter Rusty Dornin interviewed Knoxville News Sentinel reporter Jamie Satterfield in her newspaper’s offices, where Satterfield complained about all of the hate mail she’d been getting from white “racists” charging her with covering up the racial nature of the crime.

Satterfield is, to my knowledge, the only journalist to write more on the Knoxville Horror than I have. Prior to last May, she stuck to the facts of the case, but as the first, May 26 rally neared, she began producing editorials disguised as news stories, or what I call “reportorials,” attacking anyone who would state the obvious, to wit, that the kidnapping, gang rape, torture and murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom were racially motivated.

Though Dornin never mentioned me by name, she suggested I am also a “white supremacist,” when she showed a screen capture shot of my May 14 American Renaissance Web report on the Knoxville Horror, as she narrated, “Sites with white supremacist agendas made their own headlines.” (Read the transcript here. See the video here.)

Dornin neglected to tell her viewers that that “white supremacist” Web site was where she (or her producer) had learned that Hal Turner had spread the rumor that the attackers had genitally mutilated their victims, which had burned across the Internet; thus, it was her primary source for that story. The genital mutilation rumor and an interview with Turner are among the highlights of her story. (The parenthetical references to Dornin’s producer are because in TV news magazines, typically the producer researches and writes the story, and even conducts the on-camera interviews. The so-called reporter is typically a mere performer reading the script the producer wrote for her.)

Since the other main aspect of Dornin’s broadcast, the May 26 Knoxville protest, had already been covered by the Knoxville media, without my work, Dornin would have simply echoed the Knoxville media, none of whom had tracked down the rumor. It was her plagiary of my work that allowed her to deceive her viewers into thinking she had done original research.

But why, a skeptical reader might ask, should anyone believe that Dornin plagiarized my May 14 story?

1. The screen capture shot of my May 14 story acknowledges that either she or her producer (depending on who wrote her script) read my story;

2. No one prior to me had tracked the genital mutilation rumors back to their source; and

3. Dornin even plagiarized an error I had made in my May 14 article, in identifying Turner as living “in New York.” He lives in New Jersey. I corrected that error in a revised, expanded version of the article that American Renaissance published in its July, 2007 issue.


Thus, there was nothing original in Dornin’s story.

(CNN identifies Turner as “HAL TURNER, EXTREMIST INTERNET BLOGGER,” rather than as a radio host, in order to use him for its ends, but without granting the quid pro quo of letting him gain any listeners. That’s not cricket. I am unaware of CNN ever identifying a leftist or black or mestizo racial supremacist as an “extremist,” or refusing to identify a radio host with such politics as a radio host. As it is, Turner is no longer broadcasting, but he was at the time.)

If American Renaissance has a “white supremacist agenda[s],” what does that make a reporter who plagiarizes American Renaissance?

Had Dornin done her homework regarding American Renaissance, she would know that its founder, Jared Taylor, has pointed out that he could more accurately be called an “Asian supremacist” than a white supremacist. Taylor is a race realist.

(For the record, while I consider myself a race realist, anyone who knows me knows that the notion that I would identify so strongly with any human collectivity that I would derive my feelings of superiority from membership in it, is ludicrous. If I were an adherent of any ideology, it would be that of Marxism: The philosophy, science, and praxis of Groucho Marx.)

Plagiarism is such a big issue because it involves stealing another person’s labor and an utter lack of intellectual (in this case, journalistic) integrity. It took me just under two months and over 200 hours to put together my May 14 story. Since Dornin or her producer ripped off my work, and used previously shot film of the May 16 rally, the story’s only time requirement involved the producer or an assistant reading my article and a few others, and Dornin or the producer flying out to Knoxville for one day to interview Satterfield. Had viewers known that Dornin and her producer had ripped off my story, they would have had a much different reaction to the script’s condemnation of American Renaissance as having “white supremacist agendas.”

One month after Paula Zahn Now presented its plagiarized Knoxville Horror story, CNN cancelled the program, which aired for the last time on August 2. Even stealing other people’s work could not buck up the show’s anemic ratings. The network did not make an offer to Zahn to continue working for it.

Zahn was replaced by host Rick Sanchez, who recently made a fool of himself trying to hype a minor, humorous moment in the John McCain campaign into a scandal. At a public forum, a female follower of the Arizona senator had asked of New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, “How do we beat the bitch?” In a desperate attempt to turn the moment into a story, Sanchez editorialized on-air endlessly about it, claiming that it had offended all women everywhere, or at least those among his studio staff, while presenting his socialist and feminist bona fides to viewers.

Googling under CNN + “plagiarism policy” returned 367 entries of stories that CNN did on other institutions’ plagiarism problems. This story will, to my knowledge, be the first entry on a plagiary committed by CNN.

It’s been a bad year for “TV news reader” Paula Zahn, who after having for years squandered all of her money on shopping sprees, cheated on her real-estate mogul husband of 22 years with another tycoon, was cancelled by CNN, and, in an attempt to squeeze her husband in divorce court, let herself be publicly humiliated by her divorce attorney.

Rusty Dornin is still a “reporter” for CNN.

My previous stories on the Knoxville Horror follow.

“The Knoxville Horror: The Crime and the Cover-Up,” May 14.

“Shame on You, Michelle Malkin! A Republican Diva, Journalistic Ethics, and the Knoxville Horror,” May 17, 2007.

“Another Michelle Malkin Stooge Gets the Knoxville Horror Story Wrong,” May 17, 2007.

“Knoxville Horror: Trial Dates Set; MSM “Discovers” Case; Bloggers Continue Spreading Rumors,” May 21, 2007.

“Credibility SUNsets: Dave Lucas, the New York Sun, and the Knoxville Horror,” May 25, 2007.

“The Knoxville Horror: The Crime and the Media Blackout,” July 2007.

“Hunting Fugitives is No Job for Tommy Lee Jones,” July 6, 2007.

“The Knoxville Horror: Crime, Race, the Media, and ‘Anti-Racism,’” October 31, 2007.

“The White Supremacist, the Jew, and the Knoxville Horror,” October 31, 2007.

“The White Supremacist, the Jew, and the Knoxville Horror,” Part II, October 31, 2007.

“The White Supremacist, the Jew, and the Knoxville Horror,” Part III, October 31, 2007.

4 comments:

Sally said...

One of the most powerful myths enforced by media & public voices is that members of minority groups simply cannot perform vicious crimes out of the same motives that members of the majority group are sometimes said to perform vicious crimes.

While this position rarely appears in print, all of news story production, research, writing, and placement is devoted to preserving this unspoken and powerful meme.

An aspect of this (until fairly recently) was that one or two European American victims of multiple minority assailants would never be featured in media unless it was to demonstrate (a little morality tale) that the assailants were not guilty of racial or tribal motivations, and were in fact forgiven by the victims.

The Amy Elizabeth Biehl story in South Africa and the brain-bashed truck driver caught in the LA riots are good examples. Amy's parents forgave Amy's 1993murderers in what went beyond the conspicuous altruism now required of white victim families, and the LA truck driver, Reginald O. Denny, beaten in 1992, made quite a scene in the courtroom of hugging & comforting the mother of his assailant...a good example of competitive altruism that was widely & approvingly reported by media.

In essence, the dominant media culture used these and similar events to "teach us how to behave" when brutalized. Those victims and family members who had harsher things to say were simply whited-out of media-land.

This has now appeared to change albeit grudgingly, with some portions of the media willing to examine multiple minority assailant attacks on majority victims.

However, notice that terms like "hate crime" and "hate speech" are still unrecognized as having impacts in the lives of majority victims. I'm not sure it's worth pursuing the application of that language in narratives about crimes about us; it seems to me that "multiple minority assailants" (like the Jena case) is a good enough descriptor.

Otherwise, and at this time, media personalities will delight in deliberately seeking to trip up complainers about equal treatment in the application of "hate crimes" by switching the story's narrative from "lotta minorities beating up one or two majorities" to "but is it really a hate crime?" which takes the steam out of heinous crimes and reduces them to meta-narratives about how to talk about them.

Nicholas Stix said...

“An aspect of this (until fairly recently) was that one or two European American victims of multiple minority assailants would never be featured in media unless it was to demonstrate (a little morality tale) that the assailants were not guilty of racial or tribal motivations, and were in fact forgiven by the victims.

“The Amy Elizabeth Biehl story in South Africa and the brain-bashed truck driver caught in the LA riots are good examples. Amy's parents forgave Amy's 1993murderers in what went beyond the conspicuous altruism now required of white victim families, and the LA truck driver, Reginald O. Denny, beaten in 1992, made quite a scene in the courtroom of hugging & comforting the mother of his assailant...a good example of competitive altruism that was widely & approvingly reported by media."

I couldn’t remember Biehl’s name, but that case is often on my mind, as the most egregious case I know of, of white sycophancy.

“In essence, the dominant media culture used these and similar events to ‘teach us how to behave’ when brutalized. Those victims and family members who had harsher things to say were simply whited-out of media-land.”

This is a great insight that hadn’t occurred to me. I was aware from my own experiences in NYC fighting off racial attacks, that prosecutors expect white victims to show remorse and compassion for their racist attackers, but I hadn’t grasped how deep the moral perfidy ran through our media elites. I don’t know why I should be surprised, though.

“However, notice that terms like ‘hate crime’ and ‘hate speech’ are still unrecognized as having impacts in the lives of majority victims. I'm not sure it's worth pursuing the application of that language in narratives about crimes about us; it seems to me that ‘multiple minority assailants’ (like the Jena case) is a good enough descriptor.”

The concept of “hate speech” is insane to me anyway, seeing as it is in violation of the 1st and 14th amendments, as well as unconstitutionally vague, but I am unwilling to ignore it, because whites are being variously arrested and fined for so-called hate speech, while blacks and Hispanics who use racial epithets against whites are not.

“Otherwise, and at this time, media personalities will delight in deliberately seeking to trip up complainers about equal treatment in the application of ‘hate crimes’ by switching the story's narrative from ‘lotta minorities beating up one or two majorities’ to ‘but is it really a hate crime?’ which takes the steam out of heinous crimes and reduces them to meta-narratives about how to talk about them.”

I’m afraid I don’t have an answer that is going to satisfy you. It is essential, in my view, to speak of “racially motivated black-on-white crime” (ditto for such crimes committed by Hispanics), which is just another way of saying “black-on-white hate crime.” Although I find the notion of “hate crime” laws unconstitutional (see above, though I no longer subscribe to the criticism of hate crime laws that we cannot know someone’s motives, since the criminal justice system is built in part on the idea that we can know a person’s motives), if such laws are on the books, then they must be applied to both sides of the racial divide. And even if they were struck down tomorrow, it would be important to emphasize the racial nature of black-on-white violent crime, in order to document anti-white racism.

The proper response to media personalities’ sophistry is to say something like, “Why are you playing word games? When whites single out blacks for violent assaults, you don’t get all pseudo-philosophical and ask, ‘But is it really a hate crime?’ so don’t play that game with white victims.”

Of course, the Matt Lauers of the world aren’t going to invite me on their shows, anyway, but I think that ceding so much to them from the get-go (or at any point) is a recipe for getting streamrolled.

Let’s take the example you gave elsewhere, of figuring “what percentage” of the motivation for the Knoxville Horror was racial. To which I answer, 100 percent! If the victims were black, they might have carjacked the vics' vehicle, but they wouldn’t have anally raped the man, and tortured and murdered both victims.

Plagiarism Checker said...

Free online plagiarism finder - duplicate content checker.

Anonymous said...

Reginald Oliver Denny is born on January 22, 1956 in Lansing, Michigan.
Shelley Roseanne Montez (Reginald Oliver Denny’s ex-wife and now married to Christopher Coppel in London, England) was born on August 12, 1962 in Los Angeles County in California.
Ashley Rose Denny (Reginald Oliver Denny’s daughter) was born on June 14, 1992 in Stanislaus County in California
Reginald Oliver Denny and Shelley Roseanne Montez got married in Clark County, Nevada on February 14, 1982. Unfortunately, they got divorced four years later, and Reginald Denny is now living in Lake Havasu City, Arizona.