Friday, July 18, 2025

President sues wall street journal over report of Trump/Epstein note in 2003

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
thursday, july 17, 2025 at 11:17:00 p.m. edt

President will sue wall street journal over report of Trump/Epstein note in 2003

“(Breitbart) President Donald Trump has denied a report from the wall street journal claiming he sent a rather coded birthday letter to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

“on thursday, the wall street journal (wsj) published a letter bearing the president’s name, dated 2003, that was described as featuring ‘several lines of typewritten text surrounded by the outline of a naked woman, sketched in marker,’ per newsweek.

“the illustration also includes two small arcs representing breasts, with Trump’s signature written below the waist and resembling pubic hair, the report said.

“the letter reportedly concludes: ‘happy birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.

“the wsj did not produce the original letter nor specify that it had confirmed its authenticity.

“President Trump, as well as Vice President J.D. Vance, strongly denied the report while threatening to file a lawsuit.

“‘this is not me. this is a fake thing. it’s a fake wall street journal story. I never wrote a picture in my life. I don’t draw pictures of women. It’s not my language. It’s not my words.”

“‘I’m gonna sue the wall street journal just like I sued everyone else,’ he said, according to the newspaper.

“‘forgive my language but this story is complete and utter bull—it. the wsj should be ashamed for publishing it. where is this letter? would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it? Does anyone honestly believe this sounds like Donald Trump?’ J.D. Vance said on x.”

GRA: Judges will have to get laid off after Trump’s out of office.

--GRA


N.S. Somewhere, GRA updated this story that the President has reportedly filed suit against wall street journal.

If the wsj pulled a hoax, then it deserves to be destroyed in court. (But if the letter is real, then the President deserves to be made a fool of.) It has gone increasingly pc, over the course of over 30 years.

Already in the 1980s, its bosses began filling its newsroom with feminazis, most notoriously
Susan Faludi, who wrote the screed backlash (1991), and more of the same in the years to come.

Years ago, Peter Brimelow told me that said feminazis circulated a petittion to get him fired, because he was a conservative. But for a generation, the paper's lurch to the left was largely kept hidden from the general public.

Its increasing leftwing slant became more apparent after the election of the John Doe calling himself “Barack Obama.” Early in the first term of the illegally elected cia asset, the newspaper provided a podium to Doe’s partner in their sham marriage, where she decried the existence of “food deserts” in black neighborhoods, and acted as if that were Whites’ fault, without challenging her blood libel. In recent years, the wsj has hired, via affirmative action, a cabal of unqualified and unfit black “reporters.”



2 comments:

Anonymous said...


TRUMP SUES FOR $10 BILLION,RIPS WALL STREET JOURNAL;TRUMP HATER WROTE THE STORY

(pj media com)This week, the legacy media’s obsession with dragging President Donald Trump into the orbit of Jeffrey Epstein stooped to a shameful new low.



The Wall Street Journal embarrassed itself with a hyped-up Trump-Epstein “bombshell” that amounted to nothing more than a birthday card that Trump supposedly sent to Epstein in 2003.


Curiously, the evidence in this bombshell is under wraps, but Trump denies writing and threatened to sue over the bogus report.

Attorneys have now filed that lawsuit.

This latest smear attempt is just another chapter in the media’s ongoing effort to tie Trump to Epstein, despite the lack of evidence and Trump’s documented decision to ban Epstein from Mar-a-Lago. Meanwhile, Epstein’s deep ties to Democrats, especially Bill Clinton, who flew on Epstein’s jet multiple times and visited his island, consistently get downplayed or ignored. The double standard is as blatant as it is dishonest.

One might think, after years of “Russian collusion” hoaxes, the “very fine people” lie, and endless misquotations — debunked every time — these outlets would be wary of another wild goose chase.

But no.

When it comes to Trump, the normal rules of evidence or integrity are suspended.


Opponents and their media mouthpieces were so eager to make hay over any Epstein association — even an obviously fake note — that they abandoned the last shred of credibility their institutions had left.

Now, Trump has filed a $10 billion libel lawsuit in federal court in Florida against the Wall Street Journal’s publisher, Dow Jones, the reporters who wrote the story, News Corp, and Rupert Murdoch himself.

One of the co-authors of the WSJ report, Joe Palazzolo, previously wrote for a publication called Main Justice, which was founded by Mary Jacoby, who happens to be the wife of Glenn Simpson, the Fusion GPS founder behind the debunked Steele Dossier and the Russia hoax.

Both Simpson and Jacoby previously worked at the Wall Street Journal themselves, which tells you everything you need to know about the political rot festering in that newsroom.

Trump summed it up best on Truth Social:

“It has truly turned out to be a ‘Disgusting and Filthy Rag’ and, writing defamatory lies like this, shows their desperation to remain relevant.

If there were any truth at all on the Epstein Hoax, as it pertains to President Trump, this information would have been revealed by Comey, Brennan, Crooked Hillary, and other Radical Left Lunatics years ago.

It certainly would not have sat in a file waiting for ‘TRUMP’ to have won three Elections. This is yet another example of FAKE NEWS!”

GRA:Unless an "agreement" between Trump and democrats(also involved with Epstein) kept the evidence sealed for everyone's benefit

--GRA

Anonymous said...

TOOBIN SAYS,"TRUMP'S LAWSUIT VS THE WALL STREET JOURNAL NEVER MAKES IT TO DEPOSITION."

GRA:CNN's Jeffrey Toobin predicted President Trump's Friday lawsuit against the WSJ will be over quickly,citing First Amendment freedom of the press.

"If they didn't totally make the story up,there is no case.It will be dismissed almost immediately."

--GRA