By Grand Rapids Anonymous
tuesday, may 27, 2025 at 5:56:00 p.m. edt
Are bLACKS committing fewer crimes, or is only every other one being counted?
GRA: I looked up chicago’s memorial day gunfire total sunday (2 dead, 22 lead injected), and then tuesday morning. The totals had barely budged(—2 dead, 28 bullet blasted).
I was shocked.
Then today, I spotted an article:
“(zh) mayor Brandon Johnson is celebrating a drop in crime in chicago. murders are down 22% in 2025 over the same period last year, and so is overall violent crime. the drop can’t be ignored.
[N.S.: Sure, it can!]
“but can Johnson credibly make the claim that his ‘investments’ in people is the reason why? success, as usual, has many parents, but proving causation is a different matter. different people are attributing chicago’s [N.S.: non-existent] crime drop to different things, including higher numbers in chicago jails, a new states attorney who replaced the notorious Kim Foxx and more cops on the street. and it’s important to note that chicago is not alone. there’s been a massive drop in violent crime nationwide and, broadly speaking, the permissive national attitude toward crime has faded.”
GRA: Nicholas has preached about fake crime numbers for the past two decades, but have the lies, these days, ratcheted up to new levels of fantasy?
With blacks firmly in control of our big cities—from mayors and police chiefs to prosecuting attorneys—and with their propensity to lie and have a strong tendency to abhor law enforcement, why would I believe these numbers?
I don’t.
Some comments I’ve read hypothesize about deportations—or the threat of deportations—putting the kibosh on mex crime in big cities, cutting overall numbers. That wouldn’t explain a “drop” in black crime.
Someone would have to convince me that blacks have suddenly changed their ways—from coast to coast—and explain why.
More likely, an agreement has been reached by black politicians to ignore most black crime—starting with arrests, moving on to prosecutions and finally imprisonments—with black-loving media, more than happy to cooperate with black pols’ lies.
And that’s the way I believe it is.
--GRA
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
jerry pdx
Most stats I can find still indicate that blacks are responsible for 50-60% of murders nationwide...so what are the REAL numbers? 70%..80%? It's simply to politically explosive for anybody to acknowledge just how murderous the negro really is so the corrupt blacks in political office get plenty of help with the coverup from white collabos.
WHITE U S. FARMERS DISCRIMINATED AGAINST BY bIDEN AS UNPAID bLACK LOANS WERE PAID OFF BY THE GOVERNMENT
(ZH)A whistleblower from the U.S. Department of Agriculture has charged that the biden administration was actively operating a policy of forgiving loans to farmers based on the colour of their skin.
NewsNation reports that biden’s shadow government purposely hurt white US farmers by issuing a loan program that paid “off anyone who wasn’t a white male.”
The biden regime “was trying to keep this hushed because of the obvious implications of race-based loan forgiveness,” the whistleblower claims.
NewsNation asked the whistleblower, “So just to be clear, if you were american indian, alaskan, native, asian, black, african american, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, gispanic, or latino … you were told you didn’t have to pay your bills?”
The former official responded “Essentially, yes, that’s correct. And that your loan would be forgiven up to 120% of the loan value.”
The policy was enacted as part of the American Rescue Act, with Section 1005 providing loan relief specifically for “socially disadvantaged” farmers, the whistleblower alleges.
The legislation, passed by a Democratic majority in Congress, states that the Secretary of Agriculture shall “provide payment in an amount up to 120 percent of the outstanding indebtedness of each socially disadvantaged farmer.”
NewsNation notes that some farmers, white ones specifically, sued the government in federal court alleging that the policy was race-based and violated the equal protection clause under the Constitution.
A judge ruled that the loan forgiveness program was “an actual constitutional harm that cannot be undone,” and noted that the fact white farmers “will suffer the harm of being excluded from eligibility for that debt relief program solely on the basis of race … is irreparable.”
The USDA whistleblower also told NewsNation that only minority farmers received a letter informing them of their “potential eligibility as a Farm Loan Programs borrower for a payment under Section 1005 of the American Rescue Plan Act.”
White farmers were also excluded from notifications of a new payment and loan modification program available under the IRA, following the federal ruling.
“It’s not right,” the whistleblower stated, adding “It was discriminatory. Unethical. And the people who pushed it are still in charge of the agency … (those) at the national office. Trump hasn’t gotten rid of them.”
GRA:Well,you'd think he would now--riiight?
--GRA
Post a Comment