By Merlin
Sat, Oct 9, 2021 1:01 p.m.
The Internet is Both Sexist and Racist. Who Knew?
Malwarebytes Research Shows an Unequal, Unsafe Internet
Malwarebytes goes woke. More evidence that "feelings" are more important than facts. Must be the straight white males who are hugging all the bandwidth....
Malwarebytes Research Shows an Unequal, Unsafe Internet
Posted: September 27, 2021 by
If the Internet was as safe and as private as it is essential for everyday life—increasingly required for job applications, bank transfers, doctor's appointments, and filing taxes—then we'd likely have fewer online scams, better privacy protections, smaller data breaches, and a lower overall risk of individual cybercrimes that can wreak havoc on a person's life.
Importantly, if the Internet were to achieve such a promise, then everyone, no matter their gender, race, income level, education, or age, could feel as safe and as private online as they deserve.
But according to the latest research by Malwarebytes, this is far from the case. Not only do a large number of people feel neither safe or private on the Internet, but many groups, including women, teenagers, and those who are Black, Indigenous, or People of Color (BIPOC), feel less private and safe than their counterparts. Some of these populations said they suffered more frequent cyberattacks, more recent cyberattacks, and were more substantially stressed by the cyberattacks themselves.
In comparison, those who felt safer and sometimes more private online had higher incomes, higher levels of education, and higher familiarity with cybersecurity tools, such as antivirus products, VPNs, and password managers.
These are the latest findings in our "Demographics of Cybercrime" report, presented in partnership with Digitunity, a nationally recognized non-profit dedicated to eliminating the technology gap, and Cybercrime Support Network, whose non-profit mission is to serve individuals and small businesses impacted by cybercrime throughout the country.
In our report, we discovered that a collection of discrepancies—higher rates of social media hacking against younger generations, higher rates of identity theft against BIPOC consumers, lower rates of cybersecurity familiarity by women—coalesced into one, unfortunate truth: The Internet is not equal for everyone online, and because of it, not everyone trusts the Internet the same way.
A full 50 percent of all respondents said they do not feel private online, and 31 percent do not feel safe online. Women feel the least private (53 percent compared to 47 percent of men) and the least safe (35 percent compared to 27 percent of men), while teenagers do not feel particularly private and BIPOC respondents do not feel very safe.
These feelings could sometimes be traced to the data itself. Women were twice as likely as men to say their identity was stolen because of earlier, physical theft of their wallet or purse. Teenagers were, perhaps understandably, twice as likely as those aged 65 and up to have their social media accounts hacked. And BIPOC consumers were the least likely of all groups to avoid any financial damage due to a cybercrime attack. Making matters worse, when BIPOC consumers did lose money, they lost more money on average than White consumers ($1,709 compared to $1,578).
In trying to better understand why these communities felt differently about the Internet, we also looked to external data on real-life experiences. We know that women are more likely to be targets of non-consensual pornography (sometimes called "revenge porn") and cyberstalking; that those in BIPOC communities—including Asian Americans, Black people, and Hispanics—suffer increased rates of online harassment; and that younger generations, surrounded by constant privacy scandals affecting the most popular social media platforms, likely never remember a day in which the Internet was ever "private."
The good news is that we can collectively improve the Internet experiences of everyone.
In our research, we found a clear trend between cybersecurity familiarity and feelings of safety online. As familiarity increased, so, too, did feelings of safety. But for the single tool that can most likely help consumers handle online threats like malware and malicious websites—which is antivirus protection—respondents showed a concerning lack of comfort. A full 21 percent of respondents—a little more than one in five—were neither "familiar" or "very familiar" with antivirus tools, and just 67 percent of all respondents said they used antivirus products themselves. Those trends are even worse for women, teenagers, and BIPOC individuals.
Clearly, the cybersecurity community can help. We have the tools and the expertise. With the findings from our report, we also have the knowledge that not every community is comfortable enough with our products to use them. It is on us to increase awareness and to build and deliver products that are accessible to every population.
The Internet can be a better place. It's up to us to help make that happen
The Internet can be a better place. It's up to us to help make that happen
6 comments:
"The ______ can be a better place. It's up to us to help make that happen."
Fill in the blank--can't that be said about anything?Plus "better" means a lot of things to a lot of different people.
The elections can be a better place(event).
The cities can be a better place.
Border security can be a better place.
Corruption can be better addressed.
The media can be (MUCH)better.
"It's up to us to make that happen."But is it really?Are "we" in a position to do anything about anything--short of an overthrow of the current communist system(that's been imposed on the country)?In this respect,a January 6th times 1 million appears to be the only solution.
But a peaceful improvement?
I don't think so.
--GRA
Holy shit.
>Digitunity
With stories like this I'm always interested in these cooperating organizations, often non-profits like this one: what is it, who's behind it, where does their money come from, etc -- because in my experience they're usually the ones with the agenda.
digitunity.org -- Millions of people are cut off from opportunity because they don’t have a computer -- Let’s fix that together
Scroll all the way to the bottom: National Cristina Foundation - Copyright 2020 - All Rights Reserved
This is where it gets interesting:
www.cristina.org/who-we-are/our-history
Obtaining sufficient access to computer technology and gathering information on how it could best serve students with disabilities was the challenge that originally led educator Yvette Marrin, PhD, along with financier and entrepreneur Dr. David Bruce McMahan, to co-found the National Cristina Foundation in 1984. Thus, began the work of putting used computers back to work again for developing human potential. The Foundation was named in honor of McMahan’s daughter Cristina, who had met Marrin when she was a student in the Yonkers public school system.
National Cristina is a private foundation; not sure what that means except it seems they are required to file IRS form 990-PF (instead of 990), which they need not make publicly available --> link
Looks like Yvette Marrin is a Jew and 'Holocaust' monger; see here:
Yiddish Book Center -- Yvette (Chave) Marrin's Oral History
I did not look much further into her background.
McMahan is where it gets interesting to say the least -- it's not easy to find info about him, per se, e.g. a simple biography -- which is a bit odd, since it seems he is, or was (he may be dead -- ?), a wealthy hedge fund manager, but as I read on two different pages he (somehow) managed to get his entire Wikipedia page purged -- for the following reason: he knowingly had a sexual relationship with his own biological daughter (who was given up for adoption as a baby and later found her biological father), going so far as to (apparently) 'marry' her later (foto here) -- and you can find info about that:
NYPost (2006) -- A FATHER WHO ‘MARRIED’ HIS DAUGHTER – HEDGE-FUND HONCHO ‘TIED KNOT’ – KNOWINGLY – WITH HIS LOVE CHILD
The Village Voice (2010) -- MEMO TO BRUCE McMAHAN, DAUGHTER-SEDUCER (UPDATED)
You can find other articles about it and all the legal tangles that came out of it -- believe it or not, he was apparently still screwing his daughter after she married someone else.
I will probably look into this/him further later.
Here is a (more) typical result of the cooperation between non-profits and (in this case) government (and why it's always interesting to look into the background of the non-profit):
Problem: Blacks Receive Almost All Felon Firearm Charges in Michigan; Solution: White Female Prosecutor Abandons Felony Firearm Charges in Name of Reducing System Racial Bias
I summarize what went on in this comment --> link.
Basically, a far-left non-profit in NYC (founded by two Jews) focused on 'criminal justice reform' got the ear of a female prosecutor in MI and convinced her not to charge Blacks with weapons and drug charges so often since that group disproportionately commits those kinds of offenses.
As I said before, the concept of 'disparate impact' is expanding faster than the universe -- there will be a LOT more of this official non-enforcement.
That's the key phrase:blacks are not "disproportionately charged",but they "disproportionately COMMIT those offenses."
So as a reward for excess crime,you get to escape future law enforcement?
Jeezus.
--GRA
>(he may be dead -- ?)
He is:
David Bruce McMahan, 77, born on May 8, 1939, in San Pedro, California, passed away March 29, 2017. He resided in Lakeland, Florida at the time of his passing. Arrangements are under the direction of Forest Lawn, Glendale, California.
Some comedians in the comments who are obviously familiar with the incest story:
From my limited meetings with David, he sure loved his daughter. More than a father he was. Truly beyond human.
He sure loved his daughter Linda a heck of a lot!
Love for his daughter was legendary.
The Village Voice (2006) -- Daddy’s Girl
When Ewell made allegations in her divorce that McMahan had treated her cruelly, McMahan countersued and accused Ewell of engaging in affairs and “attempting to seduce mutual friends and associates,” according to an appellate opinion in the case. Ewell tells New Times that one of those men was billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, who has been much in the news lately for allegedly hiring underaged women to strip topless and massage him at his Palm Beach mansion. At the time, in the early 1980s, McMahan and Epstein worked together at Bear Stearns in New York. Epstein didn’t return a request for comment.
“Jeffrey Epstein worked with [McMahan]. He was, let’s just say, in the divorce proceedings,” she says. “I was asked to stop by Jeffrey’s apartment to pick up some papers for Bruce. It didn’t feel right, so I didn’t even go in. I stood outside the door. And then, later, Jeff said I propositioned him. There were always allegations I was having to fight.”
Melinda Ewell is one of McMahan's former wives.
Post a Comment