By David in TN
The San Francisco ABC affiliate reports on the "muddled confession" in the Kate Steinle murder:
"San Francisco jurors are hearing the muddled confession of the Mexican national on trial for the fatal shooting of Kate Steinle, whose death touched off a fierce debate over immigration."Muddled? Muddled about what?!
PIER 14 SHOOTING
Trial continues in Kate Steinle murder case
Thursday, November 02, 2017 11:39 A.M.
SAN FRANCISCO --
San Francisco jurors are hearing the muddled confession of the Mexican national on trial for the fatal shooting of Kate Steinle, whose death touched off a fierce debate over immigration.
The San Francisco Examiner reported Wednesday that prosecutors played a portion of the interrogation of Jose Ines Garcia Zarate recorded several hours after Steinle was shot on July 1, 2015.
TIMELINE: How the Kate Steinle case unfolded
Garcia Zarate was arrested about an hour after the shooting and charged with murder. He had been deported fives time and was wanted by federal immigration officials for a sixth when Steinle was shot.
Garcia Zarate, who was homeless at the time, gave confusing and conflicting accounts of the shooting. Ultimately, he says he found the gun wrapped in a shirt and it accidentally fired when he picked it up.
Click here for more stories on the Kate Steinle murder case.
The war criminal who goes by Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, now (courtesy of the treason media) Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, and many other noms de guerre
2 comments:
jerry pdx
Yes, because if you murder someone you should undoubtedly be able to sit straight in a courtroom with clear eyes and mind then give a cohesive account of what you did. Otherwise you must be innocent. I think it's a diversity defense technique now. Remember the Central Park 5? The perps gave conflicting accounts of what happened so the defense used that to claim: They couldn't have done it, because their stories should match up perfectly. Though they did consistently tell the cops that the Puerto Rican kid did the rape and some of the pack helped beat her. However, they are still innocent because some other random details didn't match up. I mean seriously, a wild confusing night of recreational robbery and assault with a pack of 30 or so thugs possibly on crack or other drugs leave a trail of beaten and robbed victims and we're supposed to believe they're going to give us a precise and accurate timeline of every detail. Something tells me these aren't the detailed types, and under pressure of interrogation trying to point fingers at someone else and excuse what they may have done, somehow I don't think it's going to happen. This was on of our first flash mob attacks and negroes have learned from it, a large group is never going to give consistent accounts of what happened and lawyers can use "conflicting accounts" that to create "doubt" for their client.
Check out black crime apologist Ken Burns turning the attention away from Trish Meili, the victim, and onto "poor falsely accused black men": https://www.filmcomment.com/article/review-the-central-park-five-ken-burns-sarah-burns/
The same defense is being used right now in the trial of black serial killer Homer Jackson from Portland OR. Michael Greenlick, the judge has decided to throw out Jackson's confession due to "coercive tactics". He also believes that because Jackson "can't remember" killing a 14 year old girl, well he must not have done it. Seriously, what rock did this Greenlick crawl out of?
Check out this quote from "Judge" Greenlick:
Though the judge said he isn't required by law to determine whether he believed Jackson's statements were false or wrong, he called it "noteworthy" that Jackson admitted only to the killing of the 14-year-old yet had no recollection of what occurred and provided details that were inconsistent with how she died.
"It sure appears that the defendant became convinced that he committed murders for which he had no memory," Greenlick said.
Read the story in it's entirety here. I've never read such legal bullshit. I'm guessing that Greenlick is looking for validation from the black community, he doesn't want to be the judge that convicted a black man of being a serial killer, he undoubtedly believes it's only white men that do it:
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2017/10/judge_tosses_alleged_confessio.html
Remember that all you negro, hispanic and muslim killers out there, just act confused, disoriented and contradict yourself all over the place and you couldn't possibly have done it, otherwise you'd remember what you did. Then play the race or poor immigrant card with every fiber of your being and you may well get yourself an acquittal, no matter how ironclad the evidence is against you.
One more thing about Jackson: They found his DNA on 3 of the victims and he had no personal connection to them. What are the odds of that? Million to one? Either he's the unluckiest man on earth or he did it.
The Mexican national. What they will not say is the Mexican illegal alien who previously deported a number of times previously [being illegal beyond the first offense is a felony].
Post a Comment