Thursday, April 03, 2014
The Duke Rape Hoax Lives! Literary Hoaxer Wrote Book Depicting Hoaxers Crystal Gail Mangum and Mike Nifong as Victims, and Defaming the Real Victims
At the time of her race-rape hoax, Crystal Gail Mangum was a prostitute and stripper. She later graduated to murdering her boyfriend, for which crime she was convicted, and is presently in prison.
Crooked, then-Durham DA Mike Nifong, in 2006. Nifong lost his job, was disbarred, and was incarcerated for one night, due to his crimes in promoting one of the most notorious rape hoaxes in American history.
[Previously, on this travesty: “Nicholas Stix’ Absolutely Definitive Account of the Incredible Disappearing Duke Rape Hoax.”]
Re-posted by Nicholas Stix
Thanks to my partner-in-crime, David in TN, for sending me this shocking piece of news.
At the time of the hoax, which began a little over eight years ago, Joe Neff was one of the reporters covering it. My recollection is that he was one of the few good guys, fighting battalions of crooked “reporters,” the latter of whom had dedicated themselves to railroading three innocent white men.
For the best non-book-length overview of the case, I suggest reading the January 13, 2007 report that legendary editor-publisher Peter Brimelow called, “Nicholas Stix’ Absolutely Definitive Account of the Incredible Disappearing Duke Rape Hoax.”
In new book, former Durham DA Mike Nifong speaks about Duke lacrosse case
By Joseph Neff
jneff@newsobserver.com
March 28, 2014
The Raleigh News-Observer
Former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong has held his tongue since his career imploded in the Duke lacrosse case. But his thoughts are about to land in bookstores, at length and virtually unchallenged.
“The Price of Silence: The Duke Lacrosse Scandal, The Power of the Elite, and the Corruption of Our Great Universities” is scheduled for publication April 8.
The book – $35 in hardback, 650 pages long – bills itself as “the definitive, magisterial account” of a case that generated tens of thousands of news stories, countless blog posts, seemingly endless cable gabfests and a handful of books.
Three Duke lacrosse players were charged with raping and sexually assaulting an escort service dancer, Crystal Gail Mangum, at a team party in March 2006. The players are white and wealthy, Mangum poor and black, and the case blew up into national outrage against the players until the facts emerged: There was no rape; Mangum had made up the story; the players were declared innocent; and Nifong was stripped of his law license.
The case made international headlines and generated a new slang verb: To Nifong is “To use the law to destroy innocent people,” according to the website Urban Dictionary.
The author, William Cohan, is a Duke graduate and former investment banker who has written several well-received books about Wall Street.
Most of the new content in the book comes from Cohan’s interviews with Nifong. In the book, Nifong speaks at length about critical junctures in the case. Cohan allows the former prosecutor’s assertions to go unchallenged.
Nifong said he still believes that Mangum was attacked in the bathroom, as does Cohan.
“I am convinced, frankly, that this woman suffered a trauma that night,” Cohan said in an interview Friday. “Something did happen in that bathroom.”
Cohan is sympathetic to Nifong throughout the book. For example, Cohan writes that the charge that Nifong withheld evidence favorable to the defense was “a red herring.” This runs counter to findings from the N.C. State Bar and a Superior Court judge, who ruled that Nifong lied to the court and withheld evidence that helped prove the players’ innocence.
Nifong could not be reached for comment.
“Sandbagged” by Cooper?
One of the key moments in the case was April 11, 2007, when Attorney General Roy Cooper dropped charges and ended the case in a news conference televised live nationally.
Cohan wrote that Cooper “dropped a bombshell” at the news conference by declaring the three players innocent.
In the book, Nifong contends that Cooper declared the players innocent because of pressure from defense lawyers.
“Roy Cooper had some real doubt about what the defense board wanted him to do – that is to declare the boys to be actually innocent – which, of course, is something that’s well beyond the purview of the criminal justice system,” Nifong says in the book. “Roy Cooper would’ve lied if he thought it would help him.”
Nifong said that Cooper’s lead investigators, longtime prosecutors Jim Coman and Mary Winstead, were just as shocked as Nifong by the announcement.
“I have to believe, based on my knowledge of Jim Coman and Mary Winstead, that they were every bit as sandbagged by what happened as I was,” Nifong said.
Coman, who recently retired after 40 years in law enforcement, was the head of the Attorney General’s criminal division, former director of the State Bureau of Investigation, and one of the state’s most respected prosecutors.
Nifong is wrong, Coman said. “These characterizations are figments of his imagination,” he said.
Coman said he and Winstead insisted that Cooper declare the players innocent, and Cooper agreed.
“Roy was absolutely appalled at Nifong’s conduct, which gave the North Carolina justice system a black eye,” Coman said.
Evidence of innocence
Coman said all the physical evidence pointed to innocence – DNA tests; cellphone records of the players and Mangum; photographs and videos; and receipts from a gas station, restaurants and debit cards. One player, whom Coman dubbed “Ansel Adams,” photographed and videoed much of the evening.
“I was just adamant,” Coman said. “She lied, she made up a story, and damn it, we’ve got to do the right and ethical thing.”
Coman and Winstead said they were not contacted for the book. Cohan wrote that he tried to interview Cooper, who declined to speak with him.
In 2007, Cooper released a 21-page report explaining the evidence of the players’ innocence; Coman and Winstead wrote the report.
Cohan has filed a lawsuit trying to obtain the underlying documents for the report from Cooper’s office. Under North Carolina state law, criminal investigative records are not public.
Cooper declined to discuss the book with The News & Observer.
Neff: 919-829-4516
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Echoes of Tawana Brawley. White liberals when confronted with unassailable evidence of Tawana and Sharpton's lies would counteract with: OK, it couldn't have happened the way they said but I do believe that "something" happened to her. They leave out any speculation as to "what" is was that did happen but imply (by omission) it was still a white racist act.
That way they can maintain their cred as boot licking black crime appologists in the liberal community.
Yes, Mr. Nifong, "something" did happen to Crystal Mangum. She felt scorned by a group of white men who didn't find her attractive, didn't get the money she wanted and tried to get back at them. That's what happened. How had is that to understand Mr. Nifong?
I have to include this from my previous comment. Here is a link to an old NY story re Tawana where they state exactly the same comment about "I believe something happened to Tawana". It was like a mantra among white liberals trying to appease racist blacks who insisted she was gang raped by a gang of white politicians and cops all Thanksgiving weekend long. Jerry
http://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/09/weekinreview/region-after-grand-jury-what-happened-tawana-brawley-s-case-attitudes-about-race.html
Yes, "something happened to that girl" was a standard mantra in the Brawley Hoax.
In cases like the Knoxville Horror, Eve Carson, and Anne Pressly murders, the kind of people who support the Duke Hoax said "there is more to this story."
David In TN
Totally agree that William Cohan wants to revive the hoax and sides with that reprehensible Nifong. They are fools plain and simple to believe something happened to that drugged out liar. Go over to Amazon and review Cohan's book and give it one star! It doesn't even deserve that!
Post a Comment