Wednesday, February 05, 2014

Black New York City Rapists are on the Hunt for White and Asian Victims

By Nicholas Stix

For a generation, we have been told the Big Lie about black crime: That it primarily victimizes other blacks. That stopped being true officially around 1987—unofficially, it had probably been true since at least the 1960s—and ever since then, every year, blacks have victimized more whites than other blacks, even with police discouraging at least half of white crime victims from reporting black-on-white crime.

In 1999, the statistician who writes under the nom de guerre La Griffe du Lion argued that, given that most whites and blacks live in separate neighborhoods, and the rule of thumb is that criminals prefer to victimize those nearest to them, “Only a hunter's mentality could account for the data.”

[“Crime in the Hood,” La Griffe du Lion, November 1999.]

In recent years—i.e., under the “Obama” tyranny—the feds have taken to making mischief with the interracial rape stats, so as to make them worthless. They have filled them with N/As, where they used to have numbers, so as to make it impossible to determine the situation.

Well, apparently, New York City, which until New Year’s Day, was under Republican/transpolitical rule for 20 years, did not (yet) get the memo.

Although most New York City black criminals live in black or black-and-Hispanic neighborhoods, they are leaving those neighborhoods to rape non-black women.

From 2008-2012,
Blacks were 31.6 percent of rape victims and 71.02 percent of rape suspects.

[“DEATH WISH at Forty: Are We Allowed to 'Notice' Race Now?,” by Paul Kersey, VDARE, February 4, 2014 at 10:29 p.m.]
By my reckoning, that means that blacks in New York City are raping non-blacks 55.5 percent of the time. Since blacks know that messing with Spanish women will bring deadly consequences, my hunch is that they are targeting white and Asian women. Black men’s obsession with white women is legendary.

La Griffe du Lion again,
The observed level of white victimization is much too high to blame on general tendencies of blacks to be violent. A more important reason is simply that blacks prefer white victims.

In 2007, the late, lamented Larry Auster discussed a 1982 interview that the late, unlamented David Mills (Undercover Blackman) had conducted with Eldridge Cleaver.
Now it turns out that David Mills, who has repeatedly portrayed me as some race-obsessed sicko for writing that black rapists target white women, conducted an interview with Eldridge Cleaver in 1982, published at Mills’s website, in which Cleaver discussed his career of raping white women and said that there was a lot of denial of the reality of black-on-white rape:

MILLS: When you came out after that first term, you spent about a year on the outside before your second conviction. And during that time, as you revealed in “Soul on Ice,” you set about raping white women as a principle of black rebellion [N.S.: Read black supremacism].

CLEAVER: I wrote this in prison. And I wrote this because I was trying to describe my own feelings, my own attitudes, and the attitudes of a lot of black men. At that time, this was something that was not really written about, talked about. It was kind of scandalous. There was a lot of denial in blacks who had these feelings.

MILLS: What feelings? Sexual attraction to white women?

CLEAVER: People used to deny that. The whole phenomenon was raging at that time because this whole black consciousness thing was coming in, interracial relationships were rising.

One of the old bugaboos of race relations in America has been black rape. It has been a big problem down through history and continues to be a problem. For my own part, I think there is often a lot of denial in that. But I think the facts will support a case that there is quite a bit of black rape.

Auster: There are three things established from the above interview and from the Cleaver quote in the previous blog entry:

• Cleaver raped white women in order to defile them and thus get revenge on the white race.

• Cleaver raped white women because he was attracted to them, and he says that other black rapists of white women have the same motive, and that there is a lot of denial about this.

• Cleaver says that because of the attraction of black men to white women, “there is quite a bit of black rape [of white women],” though “there is often a lot of denial” about that as well.


[“Eldridge Cleaver told David Mills the same things about black-on-white rape that I said in my article,” by Lawrence Auster, View from the Right, May 16, 2007.]
Rape is one of the weapons of war. We see this in the jihad that Moslems are waging in the British Isles, and every European country they have invaded. Blacks have been waging a race war on whites in America for generations.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Cleaver was a serial rapist. By his own admission had raped dozens of white women. And by his own admission PRACTICED BY RAPING BLACK WOMEN.

The man was incorrigibly evil. I suppose his "Soul on Ice" is still standard reading at many universities and colleges.

Anonymous said...

That paradigm that most crime is intra-racial was true at one time but has not been true for a long time, many decades actually.

And mostly began as a trend around the time the Civil Rights movement began to get going full swing [as a sucker punch in the knockout game].

And the inter-racial crime is directed almost exclusively so in one direction, blacks attacking whites.

That old paradigm is gone and has been gone for a long time.

Anonymous said...

English white girls groomed for the sex trade by Muslim men.

And everyone in England is in denial.

What sort of society allows a foreign element to abuse your own females, AND ON YOUR OWN LAND TOO.

Oslo Norway the same phenomenon. Every forcible rape in Oslo in one year committed by foreign men raping Norwegian women. And perhaps all Muslim men the perpetrators too.

The PDK Herald/Crier Project said...

Anon @ 9:56:

I have read about the goings on in Europe and all across planet Earth. White liberals and their white liberal ideology have sold we whites out, for their own, selfish, cowardly gain.

We non-liberal whites must begin to unite, first in spirit and understanding, then in a common land.

We our gene pool/race/culture/lands and posterity are under siege, we, like the Titanic are going down.

Time to think about a new beginning. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

It's amazing to see articles such as this that reflect the "non-white liberal's" inability to challenge their own circulated crime statistics. With such an outstanding number of white men raping children and overflowing the perverted pedophile database you would think your concern would lie in fixing your own problems before archiving someone else's as an epidemic.