Thursday, January 29, 2026

A female student at an anti-ICE protest at Fremont High School in Fremont, Nebraska on Thursday was hit by a car flying a Trump flag.


Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2026 at 11:04:58 PM EST
Subject: A female student at an anti-ICE protest at Fremont High School in Fremont, Nebraska on Thursday was hit by a car flying a Trump flag.

Hi, I thought you might enjoy reading this article I just came across: Student Hit by Car at Anti-ICE Protest at Nebraska High School (Video)

This is the link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/student-hit-car-anti-ice-protest-nebraska-high/

Is Fremont a meat packing town.

If so, this explains all the illegals.

Cheap labor for the elites..

WOOD TV CALLS THE BROOMFIELD MURDERS A "DOMESTIC VIOLENCE" INCIDENT--NOT RACE CRIMES--WHICH IS WHAT THEY REALLY ARE

Anonymous said... WOOD TV CALLS THE BROOMFIELD MURDERS A "DOMESTIC VIOLENCE" INCIDENT--NOT RACE CRIMES--WHICH IS WHAT THEY REALLY ARE GRA:By failing to call the murders of three White people by a black a hate crime,WOOD shows its dishonesty AGAIN. If this wasn't a racially fomented slaughter,why didn't Charles Broomfield kill his HALFIE kid too? Instead,WOOD brought on a Safehouse rep(domestic violence organization) to ignore the racial aspect of the murders and declare it a generic domestic incident. blacks hook up with White women to dominate and destroy them emotionally--and finally,physically. Why? Because blacks hate Whites and what better way to punish them than "to cohabitate with a naive Whitey and make their life a living hell." Another White bites the dust. --GRA Thursday, January 29, 2026 at 11:21:00 PM EST

HOW GOOD IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE? GOOGLE'S VERSION OF IT GETS EVERYTHING WRONG ABOUT THE BROOMFIELD CASE

Anonymous said... HOW GOOD IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE? GOOGLE'S VERSION OF IT GETS EVERYTHING WRONG ABOUT THE BROOMFIELD CASE GRA: I was looking up Neill's White ex-husband's name and got this: (Google AI) Jacqueline Neill (Ohio Case, 2026): Charles Broomfield is charged with the murder of his ex-wife, Jacqueline Neill, and two other individuals (Cameron and Michael Kilpatrick) in their home. GRA:Just the state, marital status and relationship of the two deceased kids of Neill's. They DID get the names right (GRA: Amazing.) --GRA Thursday, January 29, 2026 at 7:55:00 PM EST

BROOMFIELD MADE UP A WHOPPER FOR THE COPS, GOT CAUGHT LYING QUICKLY---SAYS HE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE CHARGES IN COURT; QUESTION: WHY WOULD A WHITE WOMAN, WITH NORMAL-LOOKING KIDS ASK FOR THIS?

Anonymous said... Thursday, January 29, 2026 at 6:07:00 PM EST BROOMFIELD MADE UP A WHOPPER FOR THE COPS, GOT CAUGHT LYING QUICKLY---SAYS HE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE CHARGES IN COURT; QUESTION: WHY WOULD A WHITE WOMAN, WITH NORMAL-LOOKING KIDS ASK FOR THIS? GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) — When police responded to his tearful 911 call about a shooting Tuesday morning, Charles Broomfield told them that two men had broken in and killed his fiancée and her two sons, according to court documents. The invaders had spared his life and the life of his 5-year-old son, he told police. A short time later, after police found inconsistencies in his story, Broomfield confessed to killing his fiancée Jacqueline Neill, 40, and her sons from a previous relationship, Cameron Kilpatrick, 15, and Michael Kilpatrick, 13, according to court documents. Jacqueline Neill and her sons, 15-year-old Cameron KIlpatrick and 13-year-old Michael Kilpatrick. (Courtesy family) Broomfield, 44, was arraigned Thursday afternoon on three counts of first-degree premeditated murder and three counts of felony firearm. Appearing in court via video linkup from jail, he listened stoically as the charges against him were read. Asked by the magistrate if he understood the charge of murdering Neill, he said, “No.” The judge asked his attorney to explain the charge to him. She did and again asked if he understood. He replied, “Yes, ma’am.” Asked if he understood the weapons charges against him, he replied, “Yes, I guess.” The magistrate asked if Broomfield understood when his attorney explained his rights. He said, “A little bit, here and there.” Asked if he had any questions for the court about those rights, he said, “None that I can think of at the moment.” GRA: Why ANY White woman would endanger herself and her kids with a blackie(with no job)and brains made of watermelon seeds,is beyond me. Yeah,she had a kid with him,but I mean BEFORE that. Suicide by negro is what this is. --GRA

Will the media interview the father of the two boys killed in racially motivated, grand rapids mass murder?

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
wednesday, january 28, 2026 at 11:06:00 p.m. est

Will the media interview the father of the two boys killed in racially motivated, grand rapids mass murder?

Will her ex-husband, the father of her two older kids, make a statement? Media usually searches the exes out, or the ex will go to media and say their piece.

Maybe tomorrow.

--GRA



Racism and anthropological trinity theory

By N.S.

@Pericles

@Emil Nikola Richard

goolag ai: “not due to genetic differences, but rather to a complex interplay of environmental factors, socioeconomic disparities, and test biases.”

Pericles: “Preaching to the choir here but is there any empirical support for this supposed complex interplay? Has there ever been a publication that showed it?”

N.S.: There’s no “complex interplay.” “Complex” is simply a phrase that racial socialists are fond of using. It makes them feel smart. Ditto for “interplay.” As for the three items cited, each is simply a euphemism for “racism”: ‘due to racism, racism, and racism.’ I have a book by an academic (Left Behind in Rosedale) whose author “explains” black teenagers raping and murdering White octogenarians and nonagenarians in Fort Worth as due to “discrimination, poverty, and inequality.” (‘Racism, racism, and racism.’) And he was kindly. His academic colleagues would say of the White victims, “They deserved it!”

That a goolag operator inputted its ai to say three things, was due to the human predilection for speaking in threes. That’s my anthropological trinity theory.



"when healthcare professionals threaten their patients" (Wgl video)

Re-posted by N.S.

When I was growing up during the 1960s and early '70s, no health care worker would ever dream of publicly stating that he would deliberately harm a patient. That this is happening now is due to, in the interim, the complete politicization of American society. Professionalism and politicization are antipodes.


"jan 29, 2026
"never thought in a million years we'd be doing a video about this, but what is the legal ramifications when healthcare professionals actually start threatening patients? we're not making this up. Washington gun law president, William Kirk, discusses a recent rash of doctors, nurses and other healthcare professional who have proudly announced to the world, via social media, that they would refuse to treat and in some cases do harm to patients whose political beliefs they disagree with. is that illegal? is it unethical? does it go against the very oath they've taken? we discuss all of that and more so that you can be armed with education.

"the declaration of geneva. https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbkd4SUU5X0x2NXBlNEdGcW1KT0dhV2dfR0FLUXxBQ3Jtc0tsYjBhb2x5c1hlblFrMnVSall6VTRjRzBCNlQ2QXpKVWFUaUUtTW1NMHozekFQeHBDZElFT0hCNUVUZ3lQSmFrTU5GN09tN2Q0RTdON1lnOTJLWV83OHROLWVRRDBqdVJRd240YUs1M2piZmdsbkFRSQ&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wma.net%2Fpolicies-post%2Fwma-declaration-of-geneva%2F&v=3jS2mAAzGoU

"the Hippocratic oath. https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbFdmamdMUUxjWVFXSUJidld6cFI5WjZMYjNHQXxBQ3Jtc0tueDUycXh0SVFUU0lzdnliQzNWMmgxRG1xaWZTTnYwUThRNi1pRVRQVFkxWlZBVk1Hbk14WWRGSTljV19uaU96ZjdzWndnQ3UtaGxJQTRfWlphMjFJUnp5Q1VNQ2dnZVdsTTh3a3dyU0FpTG9kSGY3QQ&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.congress.gov%2F117%2Fmeeting%2Fhouse%2F114995%2Fdocuments%2FHHRG-117-IF02-20220719-SD007.pdf&v=3jS2mAAzGoU "


"when healthcare professionals threaten their patients" (Wgl video)