Wednesday, May 04, 2022

Truth or Consequences? Please Support WEJB/NSU!


A few years ago, I started observing that policy debates consist of dueling lies. More recently, it occurred to me that when it comes to the social sciences, there are part-time liars and full-timers.

Right of center, you get part-time liars. In IQ in the Meritocracy (1968), psychologist Richard Herrnstein came up with what I call the rule of 81. He found that IQ is 81 percent heritable, leaving 19 percent that is environmentally determined. However, in The Bell Curve (1994), Herrnstein and his co-author, Charles Murray, claimed that IQ is 40-60 percent heritable, which rounds out to 50 percent, or 50-50. That’s a huge change.

Did the book explain the change? Was there some revolutionary intervening development in the science of mental testing? No, and no.

In 2014, Murray addressed the American Enterprise Institute. (Full disclosure: Yours truly used to review books for AEI’s wonderful magazine, American Enterprise, under Karl Zinsmeister’s editorship, in Bill Kauffman’s book section.) He brought up the heritability issue, and admitted that he and the dying Herrnstein (he didn’t make clear whether Herrnstein was in on it) had lied about the heritability rate. Did Charles Murray hang his head in shame? Not at all. He positively bragged about having “fudged” the numbers. And nobody rose to condemn him.

So, IQ is 81 percent heritable.

That’s momentous. Is behavior also 81 percent heritable? I don’t know. I’ll try and find out.

While I’ve never attended an AEI conference—I was invited, many years ago, to apply to become an AEI fellow, but got such a swell head over the invite, that I forgot to apply!—but I have attended many academic conferences over the years. Most were not at universities, but all had many attendees and speakers who were Ph.D.s and/or tenured professors, and many others who were researchers with all sorts of degrees. One thing I’ve seen repeatedly, is the slavish attitude the organizers and attendees have toward speakers from the Ivy League/Overpriced Private University (OPU) world. I have likewise seen the arrogance that OPUers feel toward those whom they consider their social inferiors. It’s not even class snobbery; these mooks and mopes think in terms of caste.

Now, I’m a simple man. I think that if Charles Murray had any sense of honor, he would have eaten the business end of a .38, and left a note apologizing for his sins against scholarship. (Or some other firearm; I’m not fixated on .38s.)

You have to understand that men like Murray (ditto, for Jared Taylor) think of themselves as men of honor, but the term “honor” has no moral meaning. It’s just a term denoting social status. To see it otherwise is to commit a category error, or to be hopelessly deceived.

According to F. Roger Devlin, Murray wrote a huge, dishonest book in 2012, The State of White America (which had been the title of my earlier, National Policy Institute report), crapping on working-class White men, for the sole purpose of getting back in the good graces of influential book editors and reviewers, who had ceased reviewing his books. It didn’t help him much, because those editors and reviewers refused to review his most recent book.

And in 2016, while admitting that he agreed with Donald Trump’s positions, Murray crapped all over the candidate, saying he’d never vote for him, citing the future president’s “temperament.” (As opposed to Hillary Clinton’s wonderful temperament. During the Q&A, I reminded Murray of the objective moral principle, whereby if you desire the ends, you desire the means. Trump was the means. I made no impression on him.)

Right-of-center people who slavishly worship caste, praise those like Murray, while maintaining silence in the face of his trespasses, when they are even aware of them. (Caste worship is not limited to any one political leaning.)

Socialist Zachary Karabell, who used to be a college professor, aptly described that world in his 1999 book on the antiversity, What’s College For? The Struggle to Define American Higher Education. (I worked full time for part-time, piece work wages as a college adjunct from 1992-1998.)

“The sensitivity of academics to hierarchy manifests itself in many ways, but if you want to observe one of the most unpleasant demonstrations of academic snobbery, go to a major academic conference and watch how people react to one another. Let’s say a panel delivers three papers to an audience of seventy-five. At the end of the formal presentation, the audience will ask questions. People stand and identify themselves. Those who have ‘respectable’ qualifications will elicit nods of agreement or sighs of disagreement, and others might approach them afterwards to continue the conversation. But if you stand up and say that you are from No-Name Community College, and even worse, if you say you are an adjunct, eyes glaze over. The sensation is palpable and familiar to anyone who’s attended these events.”


$$$


There are at least two methods for financially supporting me.

One is using Zelle, the other is via VDARE.

P.S.: If you can’t presently afford to make a donation (or even if you can), please forward my blog items to friends and family who might appreciate them, and post links in Internet comment sections. Thanks in advance!

So far, I have signed up for Zelle for fundraising (since the PayPal and Payoneer disasters). If you have any other suggestions, please leave them at the bottom. Thanks, in advance.

1. ACCESS ZELLE

Get started by enrolling your email or U.S. mobile number through your mobile banking app or with the Zelle app. This is the Zelle access URL through Chase:

https://secure01b.chase.com/web/auth/enrollment#/enroll/onlineEnrollment/gettingStarted/index?LOB=RGBLogon

2. PICK A PERSON TO PAY

Enter the preferred email address or U.S. mobile number of the recipient. You can send money to almost anyone you know and trust with a bank account in the U.S.

[Add1dda@aol.com It will say, “Registered as Louis.” Louis is my first name; it’s the family curse, among manchildren. ‘Louis begat Louis begat Louis...’]

3. CHOOSE THE AMOUNT

Enter the amount to send. Your recipient (i.e., moi) gets a notification explaining how to complete the payment, simply and quickly.

Second, through VDARE:

Hit this link to VDARE’s donate page.

At the donate page, hit the circle saying “Earmark your donation.” That will open up a list of writers. I’m third on the list.

Donations made through VDARE are tax-deductible.

Let me know if you have any problems.

I thank you, and your posterity will, too.

Sincerely,

Nicholas Stix

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

jerry pdx
On the subject of IQ, there may actually be an environmental factor impacting human IQ on a mass scale. In 1921 inventors Charles Kettering and Thomas Midgley identified tetraethyllead (lead) as an additive that would eliminate knocking in car engines. Leaded gasoline started to become widely used but it wasn't until the 50's that virtually all cars were running on leaded gasoline. the result was that lead levels in humans rose significantly and it is known that lead can cause developmental problems both mentally and physically. It is also tied in with behavioral issues later in life and there is research indicating a correlation with the amount of lead in the environment and crime rates: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2017/06/01/new-evidence-that-lead-exposure-increases-crime/

Here is a well made and concise video on the history of leaded gasoline and it's players: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV3dnLzthDA

According to a study cited in the video, lead is responsible for an aggregate loss of 800 million IQ points, but now that leaded gas has been banned for decades there is a potential increase in human IQ.

Whether or not psychologists/authors from the 60's and 90's like Hernstein and Murray accounted for the effects of lead exposure, I don't know, that would require some research. I'm just putting it out there as something to consider.

I have to also put this out there, if industrialized countries like the US experienced a drop in IQ points which we are just recovering from, then what will be the effect of a mass infusion of sub Saharan Africans who have lower IQ's even without lead exposure? We may not have understood the impact of lead on the human brain back when it was first introduced but we do know that Africans have lower IQ's on average. Do we really want another significant drop in IQ points? If the globalists get their way, that's exactly what will happen.

Anonymous said...

This lead stuff sounds a lot like the colored chirrens pealing the lead based paint off the walls of the tenements and eating the crap. Or the lead in the drinking water. Just let the cold water run for a minute before drinking and you will be OK.