By N.S.
"married papa John's worker fatally shot in head during apparent mugging outside nyc home: 'act of pure violence'"
"Idriss Cherif Elfarissy, 28, was shot just outside his home at east 176th street and mohegan avenue in Crotona park east minutes before 3 a.m., authorities said."
https://nypost.com/2024/07/23/us-news/papa-johns-worker-28-fatally-shot-in-head-during-apparent-mugging-outside-nyc-home-cops/
His family chased away a reporter. It's times like this that I'm sympathetic to media operatives. And what this thing says about the vic is worthless. I'm sure he complained about the street scum that harassed him. They make him out to be a saint.
What was his immigration status? And what was his killer? black or hispanic? Legal or illegal? The nyp "thing" gives no description whastsoever. Worthless.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
To me,one "minority" group killing another "minority" group is either good news or non-news to me--EXCEPT for the fact,that their populations keep growing larger(and more violent)over time. Allowing them into White neighborhoods is the line in the sand for me.Keeping them in "little india's" ,"little africa's" or little "mexico's" is the key.Let them kill each other in their little sections of a city.
Unfortunately,the minority mayors want to spread the murder to Whitey--which is why we leave those cities in a mass flight of "White Survival".
--GRA
MORE "bLACK LAW" INSANITY:MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT RULES COPS(IN HIGH CRIME AREAS)CAN'T CHASE FLEEING bLACKS WITHOUT "CAUSE";JUST BECAUSE nIGS DRIVE OFF AND IGNORE COP'S ORDERS ISN'T ENOUGH.
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) — The Michigan Supreme Court has overturned the conviction of a man found guilty of fleeing from Kalamazoo police officers, a ruling that is expected to change how Michigan officers articulate reasonable suspicion.
Douglas Prude was visiting his girlfriend at Fox Ridge Apartments in Kalamazoo on May 30, 2019, when he was approached by police. Two Kalamazoo Department of Public Safety officers on patrol asked his name, but he wouldn’t give it and said that he was visiting. The officers told him they were detaining him to find out whether he was trespassing, but he drove away. He was later arrested and charged with fleeing and eluding and resisting arrest.
“There was no reason to suspect Mr. Prude of any wrongdoing, and so (officers) had no right to detain him, and so it was not unlawful for him to drive away because the police orders themselves were unlawful,” John Zevalking, the attorney who represented Prude, told News 8.
Lower courts upheld the arrest, ruling officers had reasonable suspicion to detain Prude. Prude kept appealing and the case eventually made the Michigan Supreme Court’s docket.
“It’s difficult to get into the Michigan Supreme Court. They don’t take a lot of cases. And then it’s difficult to get a positive ruling because the courts always have some deference for the courts below. But in this case, we just felt it was worth going all the way,” Zevalking said.
Earlier this month, the state’s high court ruled in Prude’s favor.
“What the Supreme Court, Michigan Supreme Court, ruled is simply being in a high-crime area is not a reason to detain someone,” Zevalking said.
GRA:Then why stop ANYONE?That is where this is leading to.
"You can't STOP me if I run from y'all."
--GRA
Post a Comment