ny post, the view come out against RFK Jr.
ny post, the view come out against RFK Jr.
By Grand Rapids Anonymous
friday, november 15, 2024 at 11:15:00 a.m. est
the (witches’) view panel quoted the ny post as saying, “the nomination of RFK Jr. breaks the first rule of medicine—‘do no harm.’”
Didn’t scientists and pharma break that rule with the covid vaxx? And since the triumvirate of the cdc, nih, and Pfizer/moderna cover up and deny the side effects of these mRNA products, don’t they break the “do no harm” rule, too?
The public has voted on many of these clot shots—the vast majority just don’t get them anymore.
--GRA
Rumor has it,"The View" MIGHT be forced to put a pro-Trump panelist on. If Whoopie keeps putting her hoof in her mouth,that chair she spreads her caboose on may have some weight taken off of it via a thin,conservative,White female. I know the network loves Whoopie,so even the bakery story I posted will probably not be enough to eject her from our "view".
ReplyDeleteShe also complained that even with a 2 million dollar per year salary,"I is hurtin' for money--I needs to work. If I didn't have to work,I wouldn't be here."
But if she's dumped,would her future include crawling back to Ted Danson?lol.
--GRA
ANN SELZER RETIRES FROM POLLING AFTER IOWA DISASTER(SAYS SHE WAS GOING TO HANG IT UP ANYWAYS)
ReplyDelete(ZH)A once-respected poll showed Vice President Harris leading by three percentage points in Iowa just days before the presidential election, which ultimately resulted in Donald Trump ahead by thirteen points—a massive margin of error of sixteen percentage points.
Following this public opinion polling blunder, pollster J. Ann Selzer stated in a guest column in the Des Moines Register on Sunday that her days advising the paper's famed Iowa Poll are over as she will be "transitioning to other ventures and opportunities."
Selzer was once considered the "gold standard" of polling, but after Trump swept the state by a 13-point margin, winning the actual vote 56-43%, she later acknowledged her poll was a "big miss" and suggested that it might have "actually energized [d] and activated [d] Republican voters who thought they would likely coast to victory," according to CNN.
"Over a year ago I advised the Register I would not renew when my 2024 contract expired with the latest election poll as I transition to other ventures and opportunities," Selzer wrote in the Des Moines Register, emphasizing how her decision to retire was well in play before her disastrous polling results failed to capture a Trump win accurately.
She continued, "Polling is a science of estimation, and science has a way of periodically humbling the scientist."
(GRA:Which is why you can never "trust the science.")
.
"So, I'm humbled, yet always willing to learn from unexpected findings."
Well, perhaps science can become biased when some pollsters suffer from 'Trump derangement syndrome.'
Separately, Kristin Roberts, chief content officer of Gannett Media, which owns the Des Moines Register, told CNN that the Iowa Poll will "evolve as we find new ways to accurately capture public sentiment and the pulse of Iowans on state and national issues."
"Our mission is to provide trusted news and content to our readers and the public," Roberts said, adding, "We did not deliver on that promise when we shared results of the last Des Moines Register Iowa Poll, which did not accurately capture the outcome of the presidential election."
X user Torsten Prochnow had a good take on Selzer's retirement...
Ann Selzer's retirement marks the end of what was once considered the "gold standard" of polling, though her final performance suggests that standard had long since tarnished. Her last Iowa poll—Harris+3—was a stunning 16 points off the actual result of Trump+13. Such a massive error doesn't just undermine her credibility; it reflects a deeper problem with polling in general, especially those aligned with the leftist media narrative.
Pollsters today, with few exceptions, seem less interested in accurately gauging public opinion and more focused on shaping it. Many have become extensions of the legacy media, crafting polls designed to serve as self-fulfilling prophecies for leftist victories. These tactics, however, are crumbling under the weight of their own bias. Americans have grown wise to the manipulation, and the results of 2024 prove it: reality shattered the illusions pollsters tried to sell.
Selzer's exit feels symbolic of a larger trend—trust in mainstream polling has hit rock bottom. As Trump secures overwhelming victories like his blowout win in Iowa, it's clear that the era of using skewed polls to influence elections is over. The days of false narratives propped up by questionable polling are gone, replaced by an electorate that refuses to be gaslit.
GRA:I don't believe that last sentence AT ALL.
--GRA