By Anonymous
wednesday, january 24, 2024 at 4:46:00
Years ago I went to the movies in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, with a woman from work and her husband. When we came out we found their car was stolen.
We called the police and said there was a crumby-looking guy hanging out in the parking lot and maybe he was the thief. The police asked us what color the man was. We said, “White.”
The police said that couldn’t have been the car thief, because ALL the car theft there was done by blacks. So I guess there is no use trying to SELL cars to blacks there—they just STEAL them.
N.S.: My reader dated himself. No White cop over the past 30 years would dare talk like that. All White cops are diversity-trained to death, and a White cop caught talking like that to anyone would be “excessed.”
Right,was that 1967?"In the Heat of the Night?"lol.
ReplyDeleteNow,a black cop would arrest the White owner of the stolen car for calling the police on blacks being black.
--GRA
Actually at about the same time as the stolen car incident, I heard about a White guy who applied to be a police officer in Milwaukee and they came right out and told him they were only looking for minorities. So already the anti-White thing had started, but of course there were still White police--like the one who said all the car thieves were black.
ReplyDeletejerry pdx
ReplyDeleteI've seen White car thieves arrested in pdx, I'd say they are roughly 50% of car thieves. Of course, they don't always post photos or even names so maybe the media has been omitting diversity car thieves more often than White. However, 100% of car jackings are done by blacks. I've never seen a local report of a White carjacker.
Correct that is what blacks do for the most part steel a lot of the crime. Certain specific crimes in particular are unique to black folks, and especially in certain parts of the country that is so and yes, a policeman couldn’t say things like that today they be fired instantly.
ReplyDeleteMICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS RULES,2-1,THAT CHRIS SCHURR CASE(LYOYA) SHOULD GO TO TRIAL;DECISION WILL "PROBABLY BE APPEALED" TO MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT--MEANING ANOTHER HALF YEAR DELAY.
ReplyDeleteGRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) — The Kent County prosecutor has warned that the criminal case against the former police officer who shot and killed Patrick Lyoya will likely continue to move slowly even after the Michigan Court of Appeals issued a ruling affirming Christopher Schurr’s bindover to trial.
“(I)t is important to caution everyone that this does not imply the case will go to trial anytime soon,” Kent County Prosecutor Chris Becker wrote in a Thursday statement.
He said he expects the defense to appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Schurr’s attorney, Matthew Borgula, said in his own statement that the defense team is “considering our options going forward and may seek leave to appeal the decision a higher court.”
The defense has 56 days to file an appeal, and then the prosecution would get a chance to respond.
“(T)his process will take additional time,” Becker wrote. “It will then be up to the Supreme Court to decide whether to hear the appeal. In short, we anticipate a further delay in any trial proceedings.
Ven Johnson, the attorney representing the Lyoya family in its civil lawsuit against Schurr, said the family has been discouraged by the delays in the case and that another appeal would compound that.
“The Lyoya family remains distraught about the cold-blooded killing of their son, and any of these delays adds more insult to injury, as it would with any parent, any family member of someone wrongfully murdered,” Johnson told reporters in short virtual news conference Thursday afternoon. “So obviously, they would be extremely upset.”
In a 2-1 decision Thursday, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that a lower court’s judge did not make a mistake in sending the case on to trial, saying there was enough evidence to do so and rejecting Schurr’s lawyers’ argument that common law allowed Schurr to use deadly force to try to arrest a fleeing felon. The court ruled that it will be up to a jury to decide whether Schurr had a legitimate self-defense claim.
.“They recognized this case should move forward and we were justified under Michigan law in filing the charges we did,” he wrote.
Borgula said the defense “respectfully disagree(s)” with the ruling,”given that it is undisputed that Mr. Lyoya had disarmed Officer Schurr of his (T)aser.” He referenced the dissent opinion in which one of the appellate judges said the Taser was a dangerous weapon even though it had been discharged twice because it could be used in drive stun mode.
What is in question is whether Schurr’s actions constituted murder. Prosecutors, saying he was not justified in the shooting, charged him with second-degree murder in June 2022. Schurr’s defense team argues his actions were justified.
--GRA
Milwaukee in the 1950s used to be a place were white people living on the southside of Chicago with flee to to get away from them. THEM but as usual them THEM follow you wherever you go you just can’t get away with them no matter where you are. THEM.
ReplyDelete