Rise in UK asylum approvals renews fears about Rwanda transfers https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/may/26/rise-in-uk-asylum-approvals-renews-fears-about-rwanda-transfers "Home Office data shows majority of successful claimants arrived via small boats so may face prosecution - The proportion of asylum seekers being granted refuge in the United Kingdom has risen to a 30-year high, ... New Home Office data shows that 75% of asylum claims in the year ending March 2022 were granted, with most claimants entering the UK via small boats or other irregular routes. This means they could face prosecution under the new Nationality and Borders Act, which was passed in April.]
So they were granted asylum after arriving on small boats, then apparently a law was passed making that a crime (?), and now people already granted asylum (why?) are going to be prosecuted? -- seems very ex post facto-ish.
Sure -- I doubt any court in the UK would uphold such prosecutions.
This is what happens when a country abandons any sense of racial identity and a willingness or determination to preserve it: all kinds of ridiculous bullshit about legality and illegality ensues -- endless dumb rhetoric while facts on the ground are established.
Is Sunak leaving too?
ReplyDelete--GRA
What is an 'illegal immigrant'?
ReplyDeleteRise in UK asylum approvals renews fears about Rwanda transfers
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/may/26/rise-in-uk-asylum-approvals-renews-fears-about-rwanda-transfers
"Home Office data shows majority of successful claimants arrived via small boats so may face prosecution - The proportion of asylum seekers being granted refuge in the United Kingdom has risen to a 30-year high, ... New Home Office data shows that 75% of asylum claims in the year ending March 2022 were granted, with most claimants entering the UK via small boats or other irregular routes. This means they could face prosecution under the new Nationality and Borders Act, which was passed in April.]
So they were granted asylum after arriving on small boats, then apparently a law was passed making that a crime (?), and now people already granted asylum (why?) are going to be prosecuted? -- seems very ex post facto-ish.
Sure -- I doubt any court in the UK would uphold such prosecutions.
This is what happens when a country abandons any sense of racial identity and a willingness or determination to preserve it: all kinds of ridiculous bullshit about legality and illegality ensues -- endless dumb rhetoric while facts on the ground are established.
As in USA what are they speaking about illegal immigrants. And immigrant by law and definition must be legal. Anyone else is an illegal alien.
ReplyDelete