Mon, Jun 14, 2021 11:55 a.m.
It shouldn’t be too difficult to identify more details about the suspect at large. Just do a search on shootings in Austin over the past 10 years on 6th Street and almost all of the suspects are of the same demographic.
https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2021/06/12/13-hurt-in-downtown-austin-shooting-suspect-not-in-custody/?__vfz=medium%3Dconversations_top_pages
ATR: Not my headline. (“It shouldn’t be too difficult…”)
Pulled it from the Comments.
Read the Comments section.
Folks know what is going on.
And as of now there are 549 comments.
Which is a stunning number.
I guess folks are sick of both the Narrative and the Demographic.
Kyle Rittenhouse, 17. Media had no trouble at all in that instance. He was plastered from here to there for a good week.
N.S.: The Statesman clearly supports the shooters. According to the scrappy koala rule, when you don’t tell us the race, you tell us the race.
We’re talking about the media refusing to identify a mass shooter who is still at large. Thus, these alleged news outlets have no problem with the raceless shooter killing still more innocents.
If they refuse to say the race, why say the sex? Or the species? If they were really concerned about “stereotyping,” they’d realize that all information can be used to “stereotype.” Besides, the evil media love negatively stereotyping hard-working, law-abiding [censored] people.
Lantana to Gay Josh 20 hrs ago
Nope. I have no doubt race is the driving factor based on the statements made by places like Statesman. They specifically referenced not wanting to encourage stereotypes after the police did indeed release a description. My argument holds true there as the paper admitted as much, and the rest of media followed. You can't overlook that one. Race is a major factor.
Additionally, the description they are withholding is for the suspect who is still out there and thus far I have seen no reports as being a juvenile. It would however make sense if the already arrested suspect is a juvenile, but since most media won’t even tell us that and I can’t find official information from police, we don’t know that for sure. If that is the case, then yes, that would especially explain the media’s silence. Not only are they not disclosing the race to avoid stereotypes, as expressly admitted, they aren’t mentioning that the person was too young to even purchase or carry a gun. That is a key part of getting people like you to conflate information and scare people about gun laws.
Not sure what you are going on about with your hyperbole regarding suicide which has zero to do with this incident. Again, conflating information to distract. Not sure what a suicide attempt has to do with signage at a bar, but go on with you tangent I suppose.
You are also unclear what LTC [license to carry] even is. You don’t need it to purchase a gun, any adult can so long as they pass the background check which happens regardless. LTC is about carrying it outside the home.
The "species" is non-human,the blacks we see and hear about,committing various atrocities to the detriment of Whites and White America.They reject (White man's)law--probably to the person.Yet we still try to allow for their mindset of anarchy and genocide of Whites to somehow to be absorbed in our society.It is like asking Palestinians and Jews to get along.
ReplyDeleteThat is impossible.
--GRA
" when you don’t tell us the race, you tell us the race."
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely. But when a whitey man does a MASS shooting or even a single shooting [say of a negro mane], then the media has not even a single bit of hesitation in ID'ing the shooter as a WHITEY MANE.