He has graciously re-sent it, but fears that it may no longer still be current. I have no such fears.
WEJB/NSU has of late rebounded in its significance. It had lost significance due to it being silenced by both the totalitarian tech oligarchs, and the so-called Dissident Right (I have concluded that there is no “Dissident Right” movement, as opposed to individual DD writers, because the men claiming to lead the DD are all White Nationalists and neo-Nazis.)
However, my blog has over the past month or so enjoyed a resurgence. One reason is that I have again been posting links to Gab. I’d neglected the one major social media venue that had not permabanned me, because it wasn’t getting me many hits. That has changed, I believe (google won’t tell me), because ongoing purge at Twit has caused an exodus to Gab.
The other reason is due to the brilliant friends across the Lower 48, who have tirelessly read and prepared material for publication, including work on the China Virus crisis (e.g., what follows below) and the crisis in science and the msm, that puts the official story to shame.
By Vaxx Skeptic
For some time it has been apparent that something was not right. More people are being “vaccinated,” but cases rise where that is happening. In my area, the “vaccination” rate is 50% or so, yet in the last five weeks the infection rate has risen by almost 2 and a half times. The infection rate had been going down since around the beginning of January, and some expected that by April, with increasing vaccination to help, the virus would be fading away. Instead, it has been increasing for the last five weeks—and hospitalizations have been increasing also.
https://www.snohd.org/524/COVID-19-Data-Dashboard
Now, a Professor of Epidemiology at Yale, Dr. Harvey Risch, said on Steve Bannon's show that 60% of new Wuhan Virus cases are in people who have been vaccinated.
https://generaldispatch.whatfinger.com/bannon-60-of-new-covid-patients-have-been-vaccinated/
I haven’t read of anywhere where the vaccination rate is as high as 60%—so it appears that people are more likely to get sick with the virus if they have been vaccinated. If the shot were protecting people, one would expect that almost all the new cases would be among those yet to get the shot—with perhaps only a tiny percentage among those where the so-called “vaccination” didn’t take.
Some are going to claim that the “vaccination” must give people the virus, but the shots do not contain the actual virus so that is not possible. It is possible, however, that the shot makes people more susceptible. Some will claim that the rise is just due to inaccurate testing or that the new cases aren’t serious—but if either claim were true, hospitalizations wouldn’t be rising. In any case, if this 60% figure is accurate, the shot is not giving people the protection they thought they would get. Does anyone really know what is happening and, if so, why aren’t they telling us?
Some also dismiss the safety issue, saying that only a tiny percentage of people have had blood clots with the Astra-Zeneca “vaccine” and the Johnson & Johnson “vaccine,” but an article on the website of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons says that “blood clotting needs to be watched” with the other vaccines as well. https://aapsonline.org/blood-clotting-needs-to-be-watched-with-all-covid-vaccines/
Furthermore:
“...there are questions about whether the spike protein itself can cause harm as it binds to tissue receptors, AAPS points out. Physicians and scientists have asked the EMA about the possibility of blood clots due to the binding of the viral spike protein to platelets. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not responded to concerns that mRNA products, through spike proteins, have 'the potential to cause microvascular injury [inflammation and small blood clots called microthrombi] to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways that were not assessed in the safety trials.’”
Therefore, while clotting issues have only been identified in a small number of people, who knows what damage is being done to internal organs of other “vaccination” recipients without anyone knowing it yet? So the shots are not stopping people from getting sick and no one knows what long-term effects the spike proteins created by the shot will produce.
Anyone saying the shots are safe is either lying or ignorant— with no long-term testing, the long-term effects are simply unknown—the people actually getting the shots are the long-term test subjects. Could there be massive die-offs next flu (and Covid) season? Yet we read about “vaccine passports” to force people to get these experimental “vaccinations.” When will the public demand explanations, and when will those responsible be held accountable? With universities wanting to force students to get these shots, and all the millions of others being “vaccinated”—including pilots, medical personnel, etc.—the future could be grim.
One small correction--the author is not really a vaccination skeptic--just skeptical of the experimental Wuhan Virus "vaccination." Based on studies that the Mumps, Measles, and Rubella live vaccine reduces severity of the Wuhan Virus and with a high enough Mumps titer, actually makes one functionally immune to the Wuhan Virus, I, plus my friends and family, actually got two MMR shots. Two MMR vaccinations (with some time in between) are sometimes needed to achieve enough immunity. For 20 years I got a flu vaccination every year, but did not this year. Although the flu vaccination provides some immunity from flu--generally not a lot--there are some studies that indicate that limited protection from flu comes at the expense of greater chance of catching other respiratory infections. From previous time spent writing medical abstracts, I have found that for every medical study, there is probably at least one that contradicts it. With the war on inexpensive and effective medications for the Wuhan Virus, it has become apparent that drug companies exert tremendous control of the medical establishment, medical media, and government agencies. Consequently the public is left to gather opinions from various doctors and medical experts and try to figure out which ones are correct.
ReplyDeleteREPOST:GRAND RAPIDS AREA WOMAN DIES AFTER RECEIVING J&J VACCINE APRIL 8TH
ReplyDeleteGRA:It's important to know about any and all deaths related to the vaccine--and the symptoms that go with a "bad reaction."
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) — The family of an Ionia-area wife and mother says she died due to complications after receiving the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine.
Anne VanGeest, 35, died April 19 at Mercy Health Saint Mary’s in Grand Rapids.
“It is with profound sadness that we share the news of Anne’s passing as the result of complications after receiving the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine,” her family said in a Thursday morning statement released through a Grand Rapids public relations firm.
The statement from a representative of VanGeest’s family stopped short of saying she died from the J&J vaccine, instead saying she died “as the result of complications after (emphasis added) receiving the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine.”
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed to VanGeest’s family that her death was reported through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a vaccine safety system managed by the CDC and FDA.
“We did receive a VAERS report concerning (Anne’s) case. It was filed by her healthcare provider,” wrote a member of the CDC Immunization Safety Office in an email exchange with one of VanGeest’s relatives.
“VAERS accepts reports of possible side effects (also called ‘adverse events’) following vaccination. The system is not designed to determine whether a reported adverse event was caused by the vaccine, but serves as an early warning system and helps CDC and FDA identify areas for further study. When VAERS receives reports of serious illness or death after vaccination, VAERS staff contact the hospital where the patient was treated to obtain the associated medical records to better understand the adverse event. They do not routinely contact the family.”
Neither the FDA nor the CDC would confirm to News 8 that it’s investigating Van Geest’s death.
When Target 8 reached out to Johnson & Johnson last week, it provided a statement in response but did not directly address VanGeest’s case:
“There is no greater priority than the safety and well-being of the people we serve, and we carefully review reports of adverse events in individuals receiving our medicines or vaccines. Any report about an individual receiving our COVID-19 vaccine and our assessment of that report is shared with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other appropriate health authorities. This is part of the established process to inform health authorities’ comprehensive surveillance programs that monitor the overall safety of medicines, as well the vaccines authorized for use against this pandemic.”
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
VanGeest’s family said she received the vaccine April 8. She later developed a persistent headache, which is one of the symptoms reported in women under 50 who suffered a rare complication of the J&J vaccine.
--GRA
"PRECIPITOUS DROP" OF PEOPLE GETTING JABBED CAUSES BIDEN POLICY CHANGE
ReplyDeleteGRA:It must be more of a mindset change than what AP is letting on--large numbers of potential guinea pigs must be saying,"no."
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration will begin shifting how it allocates COVID-19 shots to states, moving doses from states with lower demand to those with stronger interest in vaccines, an administration official said Tuesday.
The change away from a strict by-population allocation comes as demand for the coronavirus vaccines has dropped nationwide, but especially precipitously in some areas, with some states turning down part or all of their weekly dose allotments. The federal government will now shift some of those doses to areas with higher demand, in an effort to speed shots in those areas.
--GRA