-----Original Message-----
From: The Epoch Times <newsletter@theepochtimes.com>
To: add1dda@aol.com
Sent: Sat, Jan 23, 2021 9:18 p.m.
From: The Epoch Times <newsletter@theepochtimes.com>
To: add1dda@aol.com
Sent: Sat, Jan 23, 2021 9:18 p.m.
Exclusive: Dershowitz Outlines Legal Possibilities for Senate on Trump Impeachment Trial
 Exclusive  Many of us here at The Epoch Times have escaped living under communist regimes. Across the United States, statues of great historical significance, monuments that represent our history and traditions, have been torn down and destroyed. There is no question that communism has been rearing its ugly head. And this is why now, more than ever, it is essential that you have access to the news reported in Truth and Tradition. We want to make sure that you have access to the Truth: Get an Unlimited Digital Subscription to The Epoch Times today for just $1 for your first 2 months: Latest Also Worth Reading  About us  |
"Dershowitz also noted the 'massive movement' in the direction of censorship from a group of people that are of 'goodwill, zealous, but without understanding,' rendering it more difficult to counter."
ReplyDeleteNO! Liberals have always had a hidden agenda, sinister even. They are not just good intentioned persons of goodwill.
Dershowitz is wrong most of the time when he talks for free.
ReplyDelete--GRA
RAND PAUL MAKES THE PERFECT COUNTER-ARGUMENT TO PROPAGANDIST STEPHANOPOULOS
ReplyDelete(ZH)Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) took to ABC on Sunday morning with George Stephanopoulos to discuss election integrity of the 2020 election, in a discussion which immediately devolved into an inquisition during which Paul was repeatedly pressed to disavow claims that the election was stolen.
Paul not only pushed back - he put Stephanopoulos in his place, accusing the host of 'inserting yourself in the middle' and 'forgetting who you are as a journalist.'
Stephanopoulos began by asking Paul to admit the "election was not stolen" - to which Paul responded by saying "The debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur. We never had any presentation in court where we ever looked at the evidence..."
Paul continued: "There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature. To me those are clearly unconstitutional and I think there's still a chance those do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court."
"No election is perfect," Stephanopoulos shot back, telling Paul there were "86 challenges filed by President Trump, all were dismissed". As Paul tries to argue that many cases were dismissed for lack of standing and not due to examination of evidence, Stephanopoulos responds: "Can't you just say the words 'this election wasn't stolen'?"
'75% of Republicans want to look at election integrity,' Paul responds. Stephanopoulos responds by saying that those 75% agree with him because they were "fed a big lie" from the President.
Paul pushed back, telling Stephanopoulos: "You immediately say everything's a lie instead of saying there's two sides to everything. Historically what would happen is if I said I thought there was fraud, you'd interview someone else who said there wasn't. But now you insert yourself in the middle and say that the absolute fact is that everything I'm saying is a lie."
GRA:This is the ultimate argument that I have been asserting for some time--that the media should interview representatives of each side of an issue and not get involved themselves,as AP,NBC,etc do,by calling Trump a liar or repeating the "without proof" mantra 10 times an hour.Paul has it 100% correct.
--GRA