By R.C.
Sat, Dec 28, 2019 11:09 p.m.Suspects arrested in last week's spree of eight anti-Semitic attacks are being quickly released right back into the neighborhoods they terrorized thanks to "bail reform" legislation — which doesn't even take effect until Jan. 1.
 | Suspects arrested in last week's spree of eight anti-Semitic attacks are being quickly released right back into the neighborhoods they terrorized thanks to "bail reform" legislation. nypost.com |
How that White Privilege working out Hymie?
ReplyDeleteMore and more coming too. This is being organized and promoted by someone very evil. And of course Don is to blame.
ReplyDeleteSame violent criminal almost immediately attacks another woman 'randomly' in Prospect Heights - a high-end Brooklyn neighborhood.
ReplyDeleteWarren Wilhelm currently offering one new excuse after the other for why this happened.
Welcome to the New Normal, coming soon to a neighborhood near you!
"Woman accused of assaulting 3 Jewish women arrested again day after release"
https://nypost.com/2019/12/29/woman-accused-of-assaulting-3-jewish-women-arrested-again-day-after-release/
This happened today, Monday Dec 30th:
ReplyDelete'Tiffany Harris let loose again after second alleged anti-Semitic assault' (not a misprint):
https://nypost.com/2019/12/30/tiffany-harris-let-loose-again-after-second-alleged-anti-semitic-assault/
'At her second arraignment in three days, Tiffany Harris, 30, was ordered into supervised release for the latest incident, in which she allegedly slugged a woman in the face in front of her two young children early Sunday in Prospect Heights.'
'Harris, who pleaded not guilty, was indeed ordered into supervised release by Judge Archana Rao, the most stringent ruling that officials said she could make given the charges.'
So, Tiffany Harris is '2 for 3' - for unprovoked, racist violent assault - in as many days - and the 'most stringent' ruling 'Judge Rao' could make is 'supervised release'?
What does this mean - that some parole officer will accompany her wherever she goes?
Is there a sane person who believes that this unrestrained animal will NOT lash out again?
If the next victim - perhaps before being struck in the face - decides to defend herself in some proactive manner - would SHE be arrested - and charged - with a FELONY?
This fucking city couldn't make it more clear that the law is meaningless, that any crime victim can expect NOTHING by way of protection from public savagery like this.