How Many Whistleblowers are There?

By Nicholas Stix

First, we heard that there was one anonymous whistleblower (AW1). Then we heard that a second anonymous whistleblower (AW2), who vouched for the credibility of the first one. And Marxist Lügenpresse/Fake News/Evil Media organizations emphasize that the AWs are both members of the “intelligence community.”

While the Lügenpresse has admitted that neither AW was an eye or earwitness to anything, their news readers and talking heads act as if they were serious sources of information. On CNN Sunday, Ana Cabrera sounded just like a DNC talking head, or communist politician, in denouncing “reckless accusations,” but she was talking about President Trump. And all the while, she was making reckless accusations.

As was DNC law professor Jeffrey Toobin, for whom Trump's "crimes" are obvious.

But of course, that’s what the racial socialists have been doing to Trump, ever since he announced his candidacy in 2015.

Cabrera then had on failed presidential candidate Sen. Cory Booker (Zanu PF-N.J.), who just talked and talked and talked, and said nothing at all. You’d think he’d be embarrassed. He was spouting words like “virtue.” Cory Booker! (I predict that if Fauxcahontas gets the Democrat presidential nomination, she’ll choose Booker as her running mate. The Democrats can’t win without blacks voting for them early and often, and blacks won’t vote Red, unless there’s at least one black candidate on the ticket. But the Democrats cannot have two female son their ticket, as in Fauxcahontas/Harris, so that leaves only Booker.)

The answer to my title question, is zero. There are no whistleblowers. To be a whistleblower requires that one have new information he is supplying to the public. Ana Cabrera didn’t even claim that either of these shadowy figures has any information. In fact, she and her communist comrades implicitly acknowledged that neither has any. Cabrera said that the AWs are saying that we must investigate half-a-dozen people, and implied that we must do as these individuals say, because they are members of the “intelligence community.”

This is ridiculous. The true number of “whistleblowers” is zero.

You don’t investigate people with only baseless accusations or outright lies to go on. That was the same basis for the FISA warrants that the John Doe calling himself Barack Obama used to get the Russiagate conspiracy to undo the 2016 election going, and seditious conspirators in the MSM are still playing the same game.

The people whom the seditious conspirators call “whistleblowers” are, in fact, at best mere gossips, and at worst, still more seditious conspirators.

And since the so-called intelligence community is up to its eyeballs in a seditious conspiracy, its credibility is non-existent.

I need to clarify this term, however, “the intelligence community.” Racial socialists always use the phrase “the intelligence community,” as if it described some monolith, in which everyone is in agreement, at least where their hatred of anyone to the right of Stalin is concerned. If everyone in the intelligence agencies really thinks in such lockstep fashion, then they are worthless, and a waste of tens of billions of taxpayer dollars annually. In any event, there are way too many intelligence agencies wasting way too much money, and bringing in much too little intelligence.

Whenever leftists use the phrase “community,” they are up to no good. (Actually, whenever leftists say or do anything, they are up to no good.) When they say, e.g., “the African-American community,” “the international community,” “the intelligence community,” etc., they are always referring to evildoers who hate America. The percentage of the greater group which the phrase “the community” refers to varies. Blacks in America are so dominated by evil that the people the phrase “the African-American community” refers to may be 90% of blacks. But when racial socialists say, “the international community,” they are blowing smoke. There is no such thing. However, what the racial socialists really mean is nations whose leaders are the enemies of America, with the implication that we should follow these evildoers’ demands, instead of what is in our vital national interests.

Only a suicidal fool would do that.

(The seditious Left also does this in individual cases, when it celebrates someone, based on his hatred of America, and condemns anyone who dares to criticize the enemy. A dramatic instance of this was when the Pakistani jihadi, Khizr Muazzam Khan, who sought to impose sharia law, and whose son had died in battle in an American uniform, attacked candidate Donald Trump in a pathetic, political speech at the 2016 Democratic National Convention. Khan even used a pocket Constitution, which he waved from the podium, as a prop, lecturing Trump that he believed in the Constitution more than Trump did. The communist MSM, which refused to inform the American public that Khan sought to eliminate the Constitution, even invented the titles, “gold star father” and “gold star families,” as part of that campaign.

The concept was “gold star mother” during World War II, not father, not family. I learned of it from Nana, although she was thankfully not a gold star mother.

Why only gold star mothers? Perhaps because fathers were expected to be stronger than mothers.)

Similarly, when racial socialists refer to “the intelligence community,” they are referring solely to those spooks who, like them, are seditionists or traitors. (When the media operatives insisted that all 16 major U.S. intelligence agencies agreed that Russia “hacked” the 2016 election, they lied, as usual. Only a couple of the agencies had claimed that, and since the claim had no basis except as a cover story for undoing a lawful election, their leaders should have been prosecuted.)

Again, why would one submit to the demands of those seeking to destroy one’s country?

The seditionists have followed the same rhetorical strategy for three years, through all of their hoaxes (the Russia Game, aka “collusion”; Trump as mentally ill, i.e., the Caine Mutiny gambit; Russia Game II, i.e., the Ukrainian gambit): Tell one whopper after another, and then talk as if everything Trump says in his defense somehow “proves” that you were right. And they accuse Trump of “gaslighting”!