By Nicholas Stix
CNN “expert” Brynn Gingras said a few minutes ago that “sources who are speaking on the record say it doesn’t seem like terrorism.”
If people are speaking on the record, then who are they? On the record means with names. No names means off the record.
Is Gingras really talking to anyone? She has the “expert” mien down pat, but she's a big nothing.
CNN host Chris Cuomo was bsing, saying that what ordinary people consider “terrorism” is not what “experts” consider terrorism.
The Boss couldn’t stand the garbage on CNN, so she switched to ABC News.
Ray Kelly, the legendary former NYPD commissioner and fakestatter, is speaking now: “It doesn’t seem like the primary target.”
That statement is meaningless, unless it was a terrorist attack.
Now, ABC News is claiming that only one person beyond the [terrorist] was “injured.”
It was INEPT terrorism--the opposite of 9/11 terrorism--but it WAS terrorism.
ReplyDeleteIt wasn't "some idiot"--which would connote "White Christians" being lumped into any possible suspect lists.
Ha!The games of semantics and subliminals continue from the media.They're fooling less and less people (hopefully).
--GR Anonymous
"CNN host Chris Cuomo was bsing, saying that what ordinary people consider 'terrorism' is not what 'experts' consider terrorism."
ReplyDeleteWhat EXACTLY do the experts consider to be terrorism??
I wouldn't want the honor of being one of a few casualties of a deranged Muslim murderer who didn't know what he was doing.
ReplyDeleteMay God help that injured man in the photo.