Marquette's argument is that McAdams publicly ridiculed a student by name in his blog, which violated Marquette's privacy rules. The student McAdams named was the class instructor, Cheryl Abbate, who was a philosophy doctoral student. Technically speaking, Marquette might have a good case.
But Cheryl Abbate was herself harassing students. Depending on expediency, she says, now, 'I'm a student,' now, 'I'm an instructor.' I've seen that leftwing tactic, going back to the 1980s.
Marquette's argument is that McAdams publicly ridiculed a student by name in his blog, which violated Marquette's privacy rules. The student McAdams named was the class instructor, Cheryl Abbate, who was a philosophy doctoral student. Technically speaking, Marquette might have a good case.
ReplyDeleteBut Cheryl Abbate was herself harassing students. Depending on expediency, she says, now, 'I'm a student,' now, 'I'm an instructor.' I've seen that leftwing tactic, going back to the 1980s.
ReplyDelete