Dead-Enders are Still Defending Jackie Coakley-Sabrina Rubin Erdely-Rolling Stone UVA Rape Hoax!

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

This was nine months after Coakley, et al.'s hoax had been debunked. Note the use of "No proof of rape is not proof of no rape." That is a variation on the pretentious, pseudo-scientific lefty slogan, "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."
 

Bob Potter • 22 days ago
They're going to have to prove that the allegations are false, aren't they? Not so easy.

 
Kevin Cronin to Bob Potter • 22 days ago
I think they already have.

 
Bob Potter to Kevin Cronin • 22 days ago
Source, please.
 

Kevin Cronin to Bob Potter • 22 days ago
Rolling Stone retraction....Google please.
 

Bob Potter to Kevin Cronin • 22 days ago
Retraction does not mean it was false. Google please.
 

Kevin Cronin to Bob Potter • 22 days ago
if the retraction has the facts as to why. why do you insist on being so obtuse?
 

Michael Dorko to Kevin Cronin • 22 days ago

If you have a source, produce it. Otherwise admit to making stuff up
 

Kevin Cronin to Michael Dorko • 22 days ago
much of this is common knowledge except for you and potter.....second start here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
 

Bob Potter to Kevin Cronin • 21 days ago

I see lack of proof that a rape happened. I don't see much proof that a rape didn't happen.
People with the most certainty are the people most likely to be wrong.
 

Hardrada to Bob Potter • 22 days ago
Seriously?
 

Bob Potter to Hardrada • 21 days ago
Yes.
No proof of rape is not proof of no rape, you know.
 

VirginiaComputerGirl to Bob Potter • 21 days ago

This isn't a matter of no proof of rape. It's a matter of, the person accused of rape turned out to not be a real person, per multiple news reports.

How can you be raped by a non-existent person?