Excerpted by Nicholas Stix
Because she asserts that she is a political leader of Iranian-Americans, not only is she unfit to sit on cases involving them, but is unfit to sit on any cases. You cannot simultaneously be a political leader and a judge. It’s completely corrupt. Tabaddor is saying that she has a “civil right” to engage in corruption.
Immigration Judge Iranian-American Immigration Judge Ashley Tabaddor in Hot Water Ordered to Recuse Herself on Iranian Cases, Files “Civil Rights” Beef
However, the PAAIA lets slip that Tabaddor considers herself a “leader” in the Iranian community.
The suit, Tabaddor v. Holder et al., [PDF] charges that the DOJ based its disqualification order on racially-motivated and discriminatory criteria, specifically Judge Tabaddor’s Iranian heritage and her leadership role within the Iranian American community.
[She’s trying to turn her corruption into a virtue!]
Well, if she is a leader of an ethnic or national group, then legal ethics prescribe that she recuse herself to avoid the appearance of impropriety, a serious ethical issue for both real judges and the pseudo-judges of the EOIR. One cannot both be a leader in a particular ethnic community and claim that leadership has no appearance of a lack of impartiality. It is clear that Tabaddor considers herself an Iranian first, as Iranian-ness appears to be her major concern in public life.
[Read the whole thing, by Federale, at VDARE.]
No comments:
Post a Comment