Re-posted by Nicholas Stix
According to communist “documentarian” Ken Burns, anyone who believes that the five admitted attackers were guilty is a member of the “Flat Earth Society,” while according to black supremacist attorney Michael Tarif Warren, representing the attackers, anyone who doubts the hoax that he and Burns have put together is part of a “diabolical conspiracy.”
Funny that a man who helped put together a criminal conspiracy to defraud New York City taxpayers out of potentially over $300 million should accuse his critics as being part of a “conspiracy.” Project much, counselor?
Communist New York City Mayor Bill (Wilhelm) de Blasio has agreed to a settlement pickpocketing $40 million from New York’s white and Asian net tax base, and giving it to the five attackers, but the latter had been seeking $250 million plus lawyer’s fees.
I have been following this case since the original crime, in April 1989. I have covered it since 2000. I have published exposés on it at Toogood Reports, Front Page Magazine, Middle American News (here and here ), and VDARE. My two most recent VDARE reports on the crime and the hoax which portrayed the five heinous, racist attackers as innocent victims of “racial profiling” appeared this spring:
“‘It Was Fun’—Robert K. Tanenbaum vs. the Central Park Five, 25 Years Later”; and
“Ken Burns’ The Central Park Five: The New To Kill a Mockingbird—Fiction Designed to Induce White Guilt.”
My reports include interviews with legal legends Robert K. Tanenbaum and Michael F. Armstrong. I have reposted the exhaustive, 2003 investigative report researched and written for the NYPD, whose primary author was Michael F. Armstrong. ( I have also reposted the 16,000-word, 2002 affidavit by ADA Nancy Ryan of the DA’s Office, seeking to vacate the convictions of the admitted and confessed attackers, aka the “Central Park Five.”)
Yet another exhaustive, almost 23,000-word investigative report was authored by Thomas Clough in 2002, and revised in 2003.
Finally, attorney and former Manhattan prosecutor Robert K. Tanenbaum wrote his own investigative report on the case.
Inmate says Reyes raped her after teens attacked
December 5, 2002
By BARBARA ROSS and ALICE McQUILLAN
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITERS
The rapist who now says he alone attacked the Central Park jogger once told a fellow inmate that a "group of kids" assaulted her first, law enforcement sources said yesterday.
The stunning account was revealed to the Daily News hours before Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau was expected to recommend clearing five defendants convicted of the 1989 attack.
Matias Reyes' lone-attacker story, which surfaced this year, has turned the jogger case upside-down.
But an inmate says that in 1999 he heard Reyes tell an entirely different tale, according to law enforcement sources, who gave the following account to The News:
Reyes, who was behind bars for murder and rape, became friends with the fellow inmate, a convicted killer. He reportedly told his prison pal he was in Central Park, riding high on angel dust and crack, the April evening in 1989 when the jogger was attacked.
Hearing a woman's screams, Reyes said he ran over to see a group of teenagers beating a jogger.
He believes he scared them off or they ran away. Left alone with the dazed and beaten woman, Reyes said he then continued attacking her. DNA evidence tested this year backs Reyes' claim that he raped her.
Law enforcement sources say they have been stymied in their attempts to corroborate the inmate's account by Manhattan prosecutor Nancy Ryan, a top aide to Morgenthau who ran the new investigation into the jogger case.
Ryan believes Reyes acted alone and doubts the inmate's account, the sources said.
The sources said she also barred two other inmates from speaking about Reyes, infuriating some investigators who believe the five youths also attacked the jogger.
"All this highlights why there should be a hearing where Reyes' credibility is tested in a court of law," said former prosecutor Linda Fairstein, who supervised the original jogger probe. "Let him be cross-examined on what he said."
In another development, law enforcement sources told The News that officials were able to talk with another inmate who said he carried a threat in prison late last year to Reyes.
The inmate said Reyes had been threatened with violence if he didn't take sole responsibility for the jogger attack.
This is horseshit. The inmate may have wanted to cut a deal himself, and thus he had every reason to lie. Physically it was impossible for those kids to attack since they were in another area entirely and wouldn't have had time. The scene didn't support multiple people being involved, the confessions contradicted the facts and the NYPD could very well have lied in order to cover it's ass. Admitting Reyes was alone means they have the blood of lourdes gonzales on their hands.
ReplyDeleteThe only thing you said that wasn't necessarily a lie was your second sentence. That may or may not be true, but was at least plausible.
ReplyDeleteWho is this inmate that claims this nonsense story of a gang rape before the Reyes rape...why has his identity never been revealed? Because this amendment to the facts is pure bullshit.
ReplyDeleteAs much as the 5 were definitely railroaded and were virtually KIDS, and once none of their DNA was found at the scene...any "evidence" was circumstantial and hearsay. A lot of kids were questioned that night. Several mentioned seeing some of the 5 attacking others--as you said, could or could not be true. Cops could have suggested it. Young people in particular are very prone to being lead. But several of the witnesses said they saw a gang rape. Most did not make names; others fingered the 5. But the evidence, again, WAS NOT THERE. and they should have dropped the case then and there. The city was very ugly to these youth.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, I really think Matias did this during or after others' involvement. It did not fit his MO. He never beat his other victims so horribly. He always approached them and chatted them up, etc etc. And what are the odds, really, that yards away from where other joggers were brutally beaten this woman's attack was an isolated coincidence?
Are you seriously suggesting these 5 innocent young men were actually guilty? You make me sick, you utter piece of shit.
ReplyDeleteAlex79uk,
ReplyDeleteYou are an evil, racist liar.