Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Starbucks Announces New, Mass Murderer-Friendly Policy

By Nicholas Stix

As everyone knows, mass murderers are an oppressed minority who feel unwelcome almost everywhere. Starbucks, to the rescue! The chain that purveys overpriced coffee and inflated job titles (its counter clerks are called “baristas”), has released its new policy encouraging mass murderers to frequent their establishments, which should make a visit to Starbuck’s much more vibrant!

It seems that the chain’s crack marketing researchers did a marketing study of mass murderers, and found that they feel that spaces that are full of white, legal arms-carrying, Republican wackos are really, truly, unwelcoming. As Starbucks is an inclusive company that doesn’t want to make anyone feel unwelcome (excepting, of course, white, legal arms-carrying, Republican wackos, but everyone hates them!), guns are not welcome in Starbucks stores.
 

Starbucks Seeks to Keep Guns Out of Its Coffee Shops
A Starbucks store in the Chinatown neighborhood of Washington, D.C.
By Stephanie Strom
September 18, 2013
New York Times
Tired of being thrust onto the front lines of the nation’s debate over guns, Starbucks is asking customers to leave firearms behind when they are in its stores and its outdoor seating areas.


The Lede: Video of Heavily Armed Starbucks Customer Thanking Staff Before Policy Change

(September 18, 2013)
 

The policy change came after a shooting rampage at the Washington Navy Yard on Monday that left 13 people, including the gunman, dead. But Starbucks said its decision was not in response to that or to the shooting spree that killed 26 children and adults at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., just days before Christmas last year.

“I’ve spent a significant amount of personal time on this issue in the last several months and I’ve seen the emotionally charged nature of this issue and how polarizing it is on both sides,” Howard Schultz, the chief executive of Starbucks, said in a telephone interview. “Nevertheless, customers in many stores have been jarred and fairly uncomfortable to see guns in our stores, not understanding the issue and feeling that guns should not be part of the Starbucks experience, especially when small kids are around.”

Under the change, baristas and other store employees will not ask customers who come in with guns in holsters, say, to leave or confront them in any way, Mr. Schultz said. No signs explaining the policy will be posted in Starbucks stores, either.

“We are going to serve them as we would serve anyone else,” he said. “There are going to be people on both sides who will be disappointed or angry, but we’re making a decision we think is in the best interests of our customers, employees and the company.” He said store officials would evaluate compliance over time and consider posting signs if necessary.

A majority of company-owned Starbucks stores are in states that allow people to openly carry guns, although restrictions and limitations vary from state to state. The company has had a handful of armed robberies in its stores over the years, as well as two recent incidents where guns carried in women’s purses have discharged accidentally, but little other gun violence in its stores.

Under its previous policy, however, Starbucks has been unwillingly co-opted by proponents of “open carry” policies and vilified by those seeking stricter laws on gun ownership. Garry Trudeau devoted six consecutive days of his Doonesbury comic strip in 2010 to mocking the company’s stance, which opened with a barista greeting a customer in a plaid flannel shirt and saying, “Welcome to Starbucks, sir. Would you be openly carrying a weapon today?”

“Pro-gun activists have used our stores as a political stage for media events misleadingly called ‘Starbucks Appreciation Days’ that disingenuously portray Starbucks as a champion of open carry,” Mr. Schultz wrote in an open letter to be published in ads in major newspapers.

Last month, Starbucks closed a store in Newtown early after gun rights supporters wearing camouflage and Connecticut Citizens Defense League T-shirts held one of their events there.

Similarly, opponents of military-style assault weapons in stores, like the group Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, which advocated “Skip Starbucks Sundays,” have staged protests outside Starbucks stores and urged consumers to boycott the company.

In 2010, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence teamed with Credo Action, an activist group that uses mobile technology and social media to push change, and attracted more than 40,000 signatures on a petition aimed at changing the company’s policy on guns in its stores that was delivered to Starbucks headquarters in Seattle.

“It sounds like Howard Schultz is making a very good business decision,” said Brian Malte, director of legislation and mobilization at the Brady Campaign. “Lots of families with children, college students and young people are Starbucks customers, and they want to feel safe.”

[No, they don’t “want to feel safe”; they want black and Hispanic criminals to feel safe.]

The company has long followed local laws regarding the ability to carry guns in plain sight. Customers in the 44 states that allow legal gun owners to carry weapons openly have been permitted in its stores there, while those in the six other states — New York, California, South Carolina, Illinois, Florida and Texas — have not, according to the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

[Wow, New York Times! How long is Starbucks going to keep stores open while refusing to permit customers in its stores in those six states, including the four most populous? Copy editor, stat!]

“I want to make it very clear that Starbucks is not a policy maker and as a company we are not pro- or anti-gun,” Mr. Schultz said. “However, there have been a number of episodes over the course of the last few months that have put us in a position to take a big step back and assess the issue of open carry.”

[Baloney! They’ve gone anti-gun.]

Most other restaurant chains and retailers follow policies similar to the one Starbucks is abandoning, although Peet’s Coffee and Tea and California Pizza Kitchen ban guns from their stores altogether. Disney also forbids guns in its theme parks, and Costco does not allow its members to carry them openly in its stores.

“While Peet’s Coffee and Tea respects and values all individuals’ rights under the law, like many other private retail establishments, our policy is not to allow customers carrying firearms in our stores or on our outdoor seating premises unless they are uniformed or identified law enforcement officers,” the company said in a statement forwarded by a spokeswoman.

A spokeswoman for the National Restaurant Association said the organization did not have a list of its members’ policies on guns but noted that some states that have open carry laws on the books still prohibit public display of firearms in restaurants.

A version of this article appears in print on September 19, 2013, on page B2 of the New York edition with the headline: Starbucks Changes Course and Asks Its Customers to Leave Their Guns at Home.

5 comments:

  1. They're tired of being "thrust onto the front lines" of the 2A debate.

    So what do they do?

    Take a side.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Exactly. They're trying to have it both ways--be gun-grabbers, while trying to pass themselves off as being above the fray. They could have remained neutral, but chose to get political. If the 2A people have any character, they'll boycott Starbucks.

    Personally, I never cared for their overpriced drinks, slathered with milk, whipped cream, and sugar, to begin with. In New York, they exist as hangouts for young, well-to-do pc types to show off fancy laptops that they have no need for, in order to distinguish themselves from the lower orders.

    I bought one of those contraptions, but only for traveling to cover a murder trial. I would never travel around town with it--to what end? I'm not trying to impress anyone, or to get robbed. And I drink my coffee at home, strong, black, no sugar.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Several years ago, Starbucks briefly tried to do a debranding campaign, to take its own name off of its own coffee houses. That's because they were getting too much flack from some of the kook left dweebs that their favorite coffee joint was suddenly a big corporate chain, and of course the kook left dweebs despise big corporations. By taking "Starbucks" off of Starbucks locations, Starbucks could portray the notion that their locations were corner house mom and pop (or should that be mom and mom, or pop and pop?) coffee joints.

    The problem is, as Starbucks found out, far far far many more people go to Starbucks just for the status symbol, just to show off that they can afford $7 for a cup of coffee. Taking "Starbucks" off the locations and off the cardboard cups was like taking "Rolex" off of Rolexes and the Mercedes logos off of Mercedeses.

    Since then, I have (snarkily, what else?) called Starbucks "the generic coffee house whose logo contains the visage of a suggestively naked long haired white woman," to make fun of its aborted debranding campaign.

    I have a laptop, but like you, I don't take it with me unless I'm traveling. It's just my phone and tablet on me when I'm not out of town, but my gorilla fingers mean that if it's not a full or near full size keyboard, actual typing is impossible.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Now that the People's Republic of Illinois is getting so-called "Concealed Carry," I have begun noticing "No Beretta 92" signs showing up in Downtown Chicago stores.

    Hopefully, some enterprising pro-gun group can develop an up to date list of stores that gun owners can STOP patronizing; there is NO reason to feed the anti-gun beasts anymore, now that they have begun publicly identifying themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nothing that a "JEWISH-APPROVED MASS-MURDER ZONE" bumper sticker cannot fix.

    ReplyDelete