Will Disneyland Have to Submit to Sharia? First Reconquistas Attack Disney, Now Moslems, in Both Cases Aided and Abetted by the ACLU

 
Imane Boudlal
 
By Nicholas Stix

[Recent work by this author on Disney/Anaheim:

“Report from Occupied America: Thanks to Immigration (and the MSM), Not Walt Disney’s Anaheim”; and

“Strategic Deportation” Would Stop Reconquistas, Leftists Re-Running The Civil Rights Show and Seizing Power in Anaheim.”]
 

Moroccan-born Mohammedan immigrant Imane Boudlal claims she learned of her rights when she was studying for her citizenship exam. Yeah, right. More like she planned this conquest, putting on an assimilationist front until she’d been naturalized, at which point she would raise Mohammedan hell.

Note that Disney didn’t tell her she couldn’t work there wearing her scarf, after her sudden religious awakening, they just told her she couldn’t continue working at the job she had properly done for two years, of working as a costumed character, like her colleagues, in a Disney restaurant. She is seeking to force Disney to submit to her will that the company have a Moslem face.

Boudlal’s assertion that Disney’s proposal that she wear a hat over her scarf made her look ridiculous unwittingly illustrates her hostility to everything Disney, whose employees who work “on-stage” with the public routinely have to wear ridiculous-looking get-ups. She is demanding, as a Mohammedan, the right to determine how she may dress, in a public function for a private business, moreover for a private business which had made its dress code very clear before it hired her, a policy which she had signed off on and honored for two years. Look for Disney to be inundated by other hostile Moslem accomplices, if it hasn’t already been, looking to help Boudlal take over the place, and impose Sharia in the bargain.

“But Boudlal maintains that wearing a headscarf is her constitutional right.

‘My scarf doesn't do anything to harm Disney or the guests,’ she told KTLA.”

She’s lying. Of course, it harms Disney. It destroys Disney’s carefully crafted illusion. It also creates a workplace conflict, whereby submitting to her demand would entail discriminating against every other religion. That would force a “compromise,” in which Disney would get sued by other employees, and have to drop its dress code, which would ruin many customers’ Disney experience, and thus harm its business.

Besides, the dress code would just be the start for Boudlal and her fellow jihadists.

Disney is just one of thousands of battlegrounds in the one-sided, racial socialist civil war the multicultural alliance is waging on America.

 

 

Muslim Employee Suing Disney Over Right to Wear Hijab
KTLA News
August 13, 2012, 6:41 a.m. PDT

LOS ANGELES (KTLA) -- A Muslim woman who worked as a hostess at a Disneyland restaurant is suing Disney, claiming the company wouldn't let her appear in front of guests while wearing her headscarf.

It's a dispute that's been going on for about two years, but now the American Civil Liberties Union is getting involved.

It all started in August 2010 when Imane Boudlal, a Morocco-born U.S. citizen, worked at the Storyteller Cafe in Disney's Grand California Hotel.

Boudlal wears the traditional headscarf, or hijab, but Disney said the garment didn't comply with its strict dress code.

Disney offered up a compromise hat for her to wear, but Boudlal said it made her look like a joke.

"The hat makes a joke of my religion and draws even more attention to me," Boudlal told KTLA at the time.

"It's unacceptable. They don't want me to look Muslim. They just don't want the head covering to look like a hijab."

Boudlal had worked at the resort for two and a half years, but only realized she could wear her hijab to work after studying for her U.S. citizenship exam.

She became a citizen in June 2010, and decided to challenge the Disney dress code a couple months later, on August 15.

When she wore her headscarf to work, Boudlal says she was told to take it off, work in the back where customers couldn't see her or go home.

She chose to go home, but reported to work for the next two days and was told the same thing.

Boudlal subsequently filed a complaint against Disney with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

In a prepared statement, Disney spokeswoman Suzi Brown said the company "values diversity and has a long-standing policy against discrimination of any kind."

"Typically, somebody in an on-stage position like hers wouldn't wear something like that, that's not part of the costume," Brown said.

"We were trying to accommodate her with a backstage position that would allow her to work. We gave her a couple of different options and she chose not to take those."

But Boudlal maintains that wearing a headscarf is her constitutional right.

"My scarf doesn't do anything to harm Disney or the guests," she told KTLA.

"The Constitution tells me I can be Muslim, and I can wear the head scarf. Who is Disney to tell me I cannot?"

P.S. I accidentally read this article right-side up, in violation of the Shaidle Rule, of reading MSM articles upside-down. Lo and behold, I then learned that this shakedown was initially a production of the Moslem terrorist front group, CAIR.

AbdulKeddou at 12:05 PM August 13, 2012
This lawsuit is ridiculous. Disney's LONG-STANDING employee dress code bans ALL RELIGIOUS PARAPHENALIA, including Jewish skull caps and Christian cross pendants.
###
Like many Muslims, this closet radical is asking for SPECIAL RIGHTS, not equal rights. She was originally put up to the federal complaint by the Saudi-funded radical Islamic front group CAIR.
###
Even liberal LA Times editorialized against this nonsense when the federal complaint was launched 2 years ago:
###
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/24/opinion/la-ed-hijab-20100824

Although KTLA “reporter”-advocate Lynette Romero was clearly supportive of the jihadist, not one of the 30-odd readers whose comments were posted, supported her.

[Thanks to reader-researcher RC for this article.]

* * *
Hold the hijab
Disney has a long history of dress policies and is within its rights in restricting where a restaurant worker can wear a hijab.
August 24, 2010
Los Angeles Times

Minnie Mouse doesn't wear a hijab, at least not in Anaheim, and Mickey goes without a yarmulke. On these points, most people would agree: When a job requires a specific costume or uniform, it is the employer's prerogative to determine what accessories are appropriate.

For less exotic jobs, the rules become less clear. We could certainly sympathize with Disneyland if it prohibited turbans on the workers who buckle visitors into the Matterhorn ride, lest the headgear ruin the faux-Tyrolean atmosphere. Disneyland is famously attentive to every detail — from the decorations along its ride queues to employees' jewelry — that might diminish the carefully crafted sense of leaving the real world behind.

Now a young Muslim woman has filed an equal-opportunity complaint against the Disney Resort in Anaheim because she was not allowed to wear her hijab as a restaurant hostess in a Disney hotel. The company reportedly told her she could work "backstage" (only a Disney restaurant would have a backstage) wearing her hijab, or she could remove it. When she refused to do either, she says, she was sent home without pay.

At many restaurants, the rules are somewhat loose about a hostess' garb. They might simply require modest attire, in which case a hijab could be perfectly appropriate, or they might mandate immodest attire. In the case of the latter, would a woman whose religious beliefs call for covering her legs be allowed to wear a long skirt to work? The answer would be no.

Imane Boudlal works at the Storyteller's Cafe, which has a Chip 'n' Dale theme.
Costumed characters visit the tables, and the hostesses wear camp pants and orange vests. The resort tries to accommodate religious traditions to the extent that they can be fitted in with the various themes. For example, Boudlal was allowed to wear a blouse with a higher neckline, and Disney offered to provide headgear that would cover her hair and neck. (The offer was rejected, a spokeswoman said.) But among the requirements for employees or "cast members" who meet the public is that they refrain from wearing religious items. Employees sign off on this when they are hired.

Ordinarily, a head scarf would not keep a hostess from performing her duties. If Disney barred Boudlal from wearing her hijab simply because they feared customers might react badly, in contrast to how it might view a ring embossed with a star of David or a pendant in the shape of a cross, her complaint would be valid. But because the company has long enforced dress policies as part of its business strategy, and applies them evenly to its employees, Boudlal would be better off looking for a job where her religious convictions can be more easily accommodated.