Monday, July 23, 2012

Is Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Trial, or is America? My New VDARE Column is Up!

 
Sheriff Joe Arpaio fights for America. We used to be a nation of Joe Arpaios. Now, we must rely on an 80-year-old man to fight for our country.
The AP’s caption: “In this May 10, 2012 file photo, a defiant Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio pounds his fist on the podium as he answers questions regarding the Department of Justice announcing a federal civil lawsuit against Arpaio and his department, during a news conference in Phoenix. For six years, the self-proclaimed toughest sheriff in America has vehemently denied allegations that his deputies racially profile Latinos in his trademark immigration patrols. Now, Arpaio will have to convince a federal judge who is presiding over a lawsuit that heads to trial on Thursday, July 19, 2012 and is expected to last until early August. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, File)”
 

By Nicholas Stix

Joe Arpaio is an American hero, and yet he is on trial. And it’s not like he’s on trial for some dark double life that was discovered, that discredits his public heroism; he is on trial for being a hero!

The federal civil trial of Arizona’s Sheriff Joe Arpaio began last week. The historic American nation stands beside him in the dock.

Arpaio is charged with “racially profiling” Hispanics and thereby violating their civil rights:

“Federal Court Cases Against Sheriff Joe Arpaio Seek to Break Patriotic Immigration Reform Movement’s Will.”]

I must seem really old to my younger readers. And yet, this spring I celebrated my annual 21st birthday. And during my childhood, which wasn’t too long ago, a trial like this, and the power of the Reconquista movement and its MSM allies, would have been unthinkable.

America was then a land of patriots, of whom the most obvious example was John Wayne, but heck, there were millions of John Waynes in those days, men who not only believed what they did, but who weren’t afraid to say so publicly. [P.S.: I shouldn't even be emphasizing Wayne, since he was just a celluloid hero, but I did so for symbolic purposes.]

We did have a red and black problem, as exemplified by Martin Luther King Jr., but King was much less influential in life than he would become in death. The history of the time has been revised and Hollywoodified out of existence.

Indeed, at the time of his assassination, King was largely discredited, even among many of his erstwhile liberal media allies—though not, of course, among blacks—due to his treasonous, 1967, Riverside Church speech, in support of the North Vietnamese Communists.

But now, according to official opinion in this country, King is God, and Joe Arpaio is the devil.

15 comments:

  1. How about writing a blog about White "James Homes" who killed 12 and wounded 50+ recently ? Shame on you Nic

    ReplyDelete
  2. (VDARE:)Speak for hundreds of millions of patriotic Americans who have been forced to live in the shadows in their own country.

    A very poignant quote from Vdare. So very true, so true.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The lawless Obama regime is turning America into a South Africa.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Joe Arpaio is a racist and hence he is on trial. You would be as well, if you are not hiding behind "Free Speech"..

    Ron was right and I hope a black man fucks one of your own..

    ReplyDelete
  5. King had 250 thousand people attend his speech in DC. How can you say he is "less influential"..People come to your speeches, only if they and get "influenced". They (white racists like you) wouldn't have bothered to kill him, if he was "less influential"

    How many people attended the sep 2012 tea party march - 25,000 at the most..So shut the fuck up and stop comparing king to a racist idiot..

    ReplyDelete
  6. The reason why no one is supporting people like you and joe as in your "good old days" is because we know racism is really wrong and sinful. Plain and simple

    ReplyDelete
  7. To Ron:
    The lamestream media will take care of James Holmes.
    The lamestream media won't say a word about black on white brutal murders, assaults and rapes.
    That's why we need Nicholas.

    ReplyDelete
  8. To Anonymous:
    There is nothing wrong with being a racist.
    Plain and simple.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Alex
    Racism is a hate feeling to a fellow human being just because of his color of skin..I wonder which religion you belong to as NONE teach hatred "is nothing wrong".

    I am not black, I am white. People like you are a disgrace to this country.

    BTW jesus was not white (No middle eastern is white)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Obama Rules..He rules you too (at least till Nov 2012)..You can't do anything about it losers..So just keep crying here on the blogs racists

    ReplyDelete
  11. America does not belong to the white man. It belongs to Red Indians and Mexicans..We fuckn occupied this by killing millions of them.I guess what goes around comes around..

    ReplyDelete
  12. To all Anonymous:
    I am agnostic.
    Pit bulls are more likely to attack humans than poodles. Chimpanzees are more aggressive than gorillas.
    These are facts, not hate speech.
    There were people in America before the Indians. What happened to them?
    Indians were killing each other long before Europeans arrived.
    Why don't you stop using the infrastructure that White man has built?
    Don't use cars, freeways, phones, electricity, planes, internet, running water, modern medicine.
    When you are sick instead of seeing a physician go to Indian shaman.
    Stay true to your beliefs: donate all your belongings to local tribe and leave the country.
    To self-hating white person:
    You are a useful idiot. You don't realize that eventually you will become a useless idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  13. A red problem? OK, I think this site is fair as a counter to the media bias that covers up black racially motivated violence which far exceeds their proportions in population. Native americans are not engaged in the type of racist violence that black americans are. Don't fire off some random incidents, heck there are random incidents of white violence against native americans, there's not a noticeable pattern even anecdotally the way there is with black violence.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anon, Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:07:00 PM EDT:

    "Red" referred to communists.

    ReplyDelete