Arrest First, Investigate Later: Press Conference by Lawyer Benjamin Crump, of Trayvon Martin’s Family, Seeks Through Violation of Due Process,

Misrepresenting Florida Law, Lying about Zimmerman’s Wounds, Mindless Repetition, Pleas to Emotion, (Non-Existent) Secret “Evidence,” and a Secret Witness to Railroad George Zimmerman
 

Trayvon Martin, left, and George Zimmerman, right
 

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
 

By Nicholas Stix

[Previously, on this case, at WEJB/NSU:

“Sanford, Florida: Black ‘Little Boy,’Trayvon Martin 17, Beat White ‘Vigilante’ George Zimmerman Bloody; Zimmerman Shot Martin Dead; Now Black WFTV ‘Reporter,’ Daralene Jones, Black Supremacists, and White Aunt Jemima Earwitness Demand That Zimmerman be Arrested”; and

“Trayvon Martin: ABC ‘News’ Gets on Bandwagon, Acting as Martin’s Family Mouthpiece; Family Lawyer Refuses to Release All Information about Teen’s Last Phone Call to Girlfriend, but Insists That It Requires That George Zimmerman be Arrested ‘Right Now.’”]

If this press conference, held yesterday by attorney Benjamin Crump, is the best argument for arresting, prosecuting, and convicting George Zimmerman, then there is no case against Zimmerman.

Regarding the girl who supposedly was talking on the cellphone with Martin, at the time of the shooting, Crump says, “I ask if you would please respect their privacy. She is a minor.”

Trayvon was talking to her “the entire time.”

“We are going to turn the tape [of the interview with the girl] over to the Justice Department, because the family does not trust the Sanford Police Department to handle this.”

“She connects the dots. This young lady connects the dots. And she blows his self-defense argument out of the water.”

“She believes the earplug fell out of his ear.

“She hears an altercation.

“Trayvon Martin never gets off the phone.”

Crump says Zimmerman claimed Martin might have been high, to justify murdering him, as if he had already planned on murdering him, when he had just seen him.

This man is a racist moron, but he is relying on racist hysteria to carry the day for him.

You can’t railroad a man based on an anonymous girl’s uncorroborated claims. She’s not a rape victim, or an undercover detective, and if she wishes to railroad a man, she gets no privacy. (I don’t support the right of women to charge men with rape, while hiring behind anonymity, either.)

He claims the police arrived on the scene at 7:17 p.m.

“We have all of the evidence now” that the cry for help was Martin’s voice. What is his evidence? The boy’s mother’s assertion. The claim of a dubious “earwitness,” who changed her original story, that it “must have” been “the [6’3”] little boy.”

The original report was that it was Zimmerman who was calling for help, but the case doesn’t depend on the identity of the voice. That’s just another plea to emotion, and demand that law be ignored.

“Voice experts are breaking that down [the 911 call], and they are finding the evidence.”

In other words, they have no evidence.

This is immediately after Crump claimed, “We have all of the evidence now.” He has no evidence, but he wants to win over the public through exhortation, repetition, pleas to emotion, demands for racial “justice,” and outright lies, such as his insistence that George Zimmerman had no wounds from Trayvon Martin.

“Self-defense is a legal argument that you make in a courtroom.”

Crump later repeated that line, adding, the “Stand Your Ground Law self-defense is a legal argument that you make in a courtroom.”

That’s a lie! That’s the same thing the racist blacks who sought to railroad the Duke Three said. Like them, Crumpf is turning the law on its head. You can’t arrest someone who has the law on his side. Period. You can’t say that the person you want arrested “can argue his case in court,” after he’s been charged with murder. Otherwise, the jury would get to rule on whether they like the law, with the “13th juror” outside, threatening to riot, to “persuade” the jury to convict, as happened in the unconstitutional, 1992 civil rights re-trial of the previously acquitted four LAPD cops in the Rodney King case. [P.S. Like the Duke Three's racist black persecutors, including law school professors like NCCU's Irving Joyner, Crump is turning the presumption of innocence upside down. He is saying that a white can be arrested without any legal basis, and then forced during a trial to "prove" his innocence. And Crump's is not an isolated madness. This is the way that racist blacks--i.e., 90 percent of blacks--think they are entitled to treat whites.]

I’m not crazy about the way George Zimmerman handled himself on February 26, but as far as I can see, he had the law, if not common sense and gun safety rules, on his side.

What Benjamin Crump’s demand to arrest, prosecute, and convict is about, is that George Zimmerman is white enough to go down. Crumpf says he doesn’t want to see yet another black child die for nothing. Benjamin Crump and millions of other blacks don’t care a fig about the lives of black children, or they’d be hunting down, bringing in, and convicting black killers every day. Instead, they routinely act as their accessories, and even perjure themselves on the black killers’ behalf.

“Snitches get stitches.”

“No snitchin.’”

Every day, I look at the framed picture of a couple of black kids on my bookcase, whom blacks could’ve helped, but didn’t. They just made money off of them, like most blacks who say, “The children are our future.” But at least, I tried.