Political prisoner Jeremiah Munsen
By Nicholas Stix
September 11, 2008
VDARE.com
[See also, at WEJB/NSU:
“There’s Your Dialogue on Race: Three White Louisiana Men Convicted of a Hate Crime for Hanging a Dead Raccoon from a Flag Pole.”]
On August 22, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal sentenced Jeremiah Munsen to four months in federal prison, to be followed by one year of supervised probation and 125 hours of community service, to be followed by five more years of unsupervised probation, after he accepted a plea bargain for committing a hate crime.
We Americans like to fancy ourselves protected from such “star chamber”-type tyranny . “It couldn’t happen here.”
Oh, but it could, and it did. Except for the reference to the “Canadian Human Rights Tribunal,” everything in my opening paragraph is true. Jeremiah Munsen was subjected to a malicious prosecution in a U.S. federal kangaroo court, by Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division Grace Chung Becker, and U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Louisiana Donald W. Washington.
On September 20, 2007 in Alexandria, Louisiana, the then-18-year-old Munson, accompanied by an under-aged friend, drove past dozens of black supporters of the Jena race hoax, with two extension cord “nooses” hanging from the back of his pickup truck.
Yeah, that guy.
U.S. Attorney Washington piled on duplicate, unconstitutional and illegal felony and misdemeanor charges, such that, had the penniless, despised Munsen fought them, he would have been summarily convicted on a “felony hate crime charge of conspiring to deprive the marchers of their civil rights by using a noose to intimidate the crowd,”and sentenced to up to 11 years in prison. Washington and Becker thereby coerced Munson, in April, into making a guilty plea “to a misdemeanor federal hate crime of interrupting protesters' federal rights to travel.”
For any slender, white teenager, serving 11 years of hard time on any charge with black and Hispanic felons entails racist gang-rape, sexual slavery and, ultimately, death from AIDS, in violation of the Constitution’s Eighth (“cruel and unusual punishment”) and Thirteenth (slavery) amendments. Doubtless, the folks at Justice saw to it that Munsen knew what awaited him.
His sentence begins on September 15.
This was an American show trial.
Never mind that Munsen engaged in symbolic speech that is protected under the First Amendment.
Never mind that the two unarmed whites were in much greater peril from a throng of racist blacks, than the blacks were from them. The blacks were waiting for buses home to Tennessee after the Nuremberg-style rally they had just attended, in support of six black high school students who had with others engaged in a racist murder attempt on a lone white victim, whom the brave blacks had suckerpunched, and stomped as he lay unconscious.
Such black-on-white gang attacks happen every day in schools across America.
In the Department of Justice’s press release celebrating Munsen’s conviction, U.S Attorney Washington claimed,
The defendant committed a federal hate crime by using a powerful symbol of hate to intimidate a group of interstate travelers because of their race. It is a violation of federal law to intimidate, oppress, injure or threaten people because of their race and because those people are exercising and enjoying rights guaranteed and protected by the laws and Constitution of the United States. Our civil rights laws protect the civil rights of all Americans, and they emphasize the reality that we are all members of one particular race -- the human race.
What about Jeremiah Munsen’s civil rights?
Were Washington and Becker familiar with American constitutional law, or with the the 1964 U.S. Civil Rights Act (sections 202 and 301), they would know that that they were violating Munsen’s First Amendment right to engage in symbolic speech others deem offensive, and Fourteenth Amendment and Civil Rights Act rights to equality before the law, based on his race.
It is Becker and Washington who belong in prison.
You can have civil rights laws and their machinery of anarcho-tyranny, or you can have the Bill of Rights, but not both. And without the Bill of Rights, there is no America.
I believe Nicholas Stix’s blog today about the judicial lynching in Louisiana of Jeremiah Munson, a 19 year-old white youth, is one of VDARE.com’s most important blogs ever. This not only because of the shocking injustice involved, but also because it highlights with chilling clarity the future of American liberties in multicultural America.
Nicholas tells us
On September 20 2007 in Alexandria, Louisiana, the then-18-year Munsen, accompanied by an under-aged friend, drove past dozens of black supporters of the Jena race hoax, with two extension cord “nooses” hanging from the back of his pickup truck.
For this he has been bullied into accepting
Four months in federal prison, to be followed by one year of supervised probation and 125 hours of community service, to be followed by five more years of unsupervised probation—for committing a hate crime.
The blog continues:
Never mind that Munsen engaged in symbolic speech that is protected under the First Amendment. Never mind that the two unarmed whites were in much greater peril from a throng of racist blacks…What about Jeremiah Musen’s civil rights?
Why has this ludicrously disproportionate atrocity, which makes a mockery of America’s tradition of free speech, happened?
Answer: Because the two Federal officials involved were, in a critical sense, not American.
US Attorney for the Western District of Louisiana Donald W. Washington is a black Affirmative Action beneficiary, appointed in 2001 by President Bush.
As the OJ Simpson trial proved, expecting anything except blind racial chauvinism from American blacks in legal (or political) contests where their own are involved is just na??ve. In that sense, they simply do not fit into the behavioral mold the Founding Fathers brought over from England. And of course, the Jena 6 flim flam was a major black rallying point.
Grace Chung Becker, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Justice Department Civil Rights Division is, in a sense, a more alarming case. She is the daughter of Korean immigrants and judging by her educational record, does have the intelligence to grasp the issues involved here.
True, she is under fire in her confirmation hearings for not appearing zealous enough at Civil Rights in seeking privileges for minorities. A Poor Choice on Civil Rights The New York Times March 17 2008
Perhaps delivering Jeremiah Munsen’s head is supposed to be her entry fee.
But this case was under negotiation long before Chung Becker ran into opposition. The fact has to be faced: talented and industrious though the Koreans may be, they have virtually no tradition of political freedom or free speech. They are also clannish and notoriously prone to amoral familialism: what does Grace Chung Becker care about Jeremiah Munsen? He isn’t one of hers.
Welcome to Multicultural America: A black and an Asian use a perverted legal process to rob a white American of his political birthright and promote the interests of minorities. The effect will be to intimidate the entire white community from resisting another Black Scam: in other words to prevent them acting politically to defend themselves.
The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave!
(Correction: My thanks to RKK, who points out that, to be more correct, I should have said “amoral familism”. Curiously, Googling on this does not any more succinct definition: this is the clearest, but it does not address the fact that amoral familism could well be a highly viable social strategy when most of the rest of the population behaves otherwise. Overall, it appears this brilliant insight was slighted as un-PC, even before “un-PC was an articulated concept.)
i wish rug munching becker and hmo washington's homes burn down with them in it.i think these traitors need to be arrested tried,found guilty of treason and hanged.
ReplyDelete