Last revised at 6:27 p.m., on Thursday, May 19, 2011.
The Administration of the John Doe calling himself “Barack (Hussein) Obama” has announced, in an official e-mail to the Boston Herald, that it is punishing the Republican daily for failing to adequately support its policies, in particular for running a March 8 op-ed by Republican former Massachusetts governor and current presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, criticizing “Obama’s” policies’ failure to create jobs, while refusing to promote “Obama’s” fundraising visit to Beantown at the time.
The unprecedented statement, by White House spokesman Matt Lehrich, came in response to a Boston Herald request for one of its reporters to be invited to be part of the pool that would have unfettered access to “Obama’s” fundraising activities in Boston. The newspaper maintains that this is the third straight time that the White House has refused to grant the Herald the right to have one of its people be the local pool reporter.
I tend to consider the degree to which papers have demonstrated to covering the White House regularly and fairly in determining local pool reporters.
My point about the op-ed was not that you ran it but that it was the full front page, which excluded any coverage of the [fundraising] visit of a sitting US President to Boston. I think that raises a fair question about whether the paper is unbiased in its coverage of the President’s visits.
As we have in the past — including the multiple occasions on which the Herald has supplied local pool reporters — we will continue to consider the Herald for local pool duty for future visits.
In other words, get with the program, and we might—might I say—just consider your guys.
Although no candidate or president has ever received such protective, sycophantic coverage from the press, “Obama” has likewise proven to be the most paranoid and vindictive of the bunch towards media organs he finds insufficiently loyal. During the last leg of the 2008 campaign, he banned writers from the New York Post, Dallas Morning News, and Washington Times from his campaign plane, in retaliation for their newspapers’ endorsing his nominal Republican electoral opponent, Arizona Sen. John McCain, and then rewarding the racist black magazines Ebony and Essence for their rabid support, by giving seats on his plane to their reporters. As soon as the unifier was inaugurated, he launched scorched earth political campaigns against Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and Glenn Beck. And last month, he threatened even the leftwing San Francisco Chronicle suggesting he would retaliate by “bar[ring] Hearst reporters from pool duty after a Chronicle reporter shot video of protestors mocking Obama at a fund-raiser.”
Hostility and paranoia towards the MSM is by no means limited to “Obama,” but rather is endemic at all levels of black America. Black “journalist” Ellis Cose even wrote a book, The Rage of a Privileged Class, in which he maintained, with a straight face, that black crime was caused by reports on black crime.
Rules of logic, like the ban on circularity, are just so white!
Over 50 years of white media sycophancy have, if anything, fueled the rage of black racists, who insist that the MSM are “racist” and “biased” against black folks. A typical expression of such black racist rage is the following comment on a story on this incident, at Politico 44:
naylor123
NA
May. 18, 2011 - 10:27 AM EST
Unfortunately these lies put out by the press are common since the first African American has become President of these so-called United States. The press is basically anti Obama because of who the owners are of the print media. It is funny to read some of the responses saying the President is somehow excluding anyone from anything. Since President Obama has become President the press have broken all the rules that have been in place for generations and I believe it is because once African Americans reach a certain level of achievement then the rules change. President Obama was elected by the majority of Americans not the press at large and will be reelected again my the majority of all Americans not the press at large. The President's good works will never be covered by the press. President Obama will not get his due until the historians record his Presidency as one of the best the United States has ever known. It will be up to the Historians to tell his story because the press won't and it is because of who owns the press in the United States. Just as the press did not cover Dr. King in any sufficiently positive manner during his time here on earth,so it is with our press today that they too will not cover President Obama in any sufficiently positive manner. The press has never covered African Americans in a positive manner and both Dr. King and President Obama are African Americans so how much has America really changed is still a open question.
Obviously, for naylor123, the question has been settled.
“Obama’s” intolerance towards freedom of the press should surprise no one, given his belief in African and Chicago-style kleptocracy, Marxist totalitarianism, and black supremacist genocide.
No comments:
Post a Comment