Powerline Blog's Republican Writers Finally “Report” on New Black Panthers' White Disenfranchisement Campaign—Over One Year Later than NSU!

By Nicholas Stix

An update to my story from earlier today, “Whistleblowing, Former DOJ Civil Rights Division Lawyer, J. Christian Adams, Fights Continuing Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice in AG Eric Holder’s DOJ in 2008 New Black Panther Party Philadelphia Voter Intimidation Case”: today, PowerlineBlog’s Scott Johnson brags, “I wrote about the Justice Department's dismissal of the charges against the New Black Panther Party for voter intimidation on election day 2008 here,” linking to an entry of his from June 29, 2010!

I first wrote about the New Black Panthers’ Election Day 2008 campaign to disenfranchise white Philadelphia voters on May 12, 2009. That means that my readers knew all about the Panthers’ crimes over 13-and-a-half months earlier than readers who relied on Johnson and his Republican blog comrades. Why is that?

1. Because, as Republican writers, the PowerlineBlog trio is corrupt, and wish only to give cronies credit for stories. They’d rather a story die, than link to the “wrong” sort of people. Indeed, Republican writers and their wooden dummies would rather remain in blissful ignorance, or even misreport a major story on race (see here, here, and here), than read about such stories at Web sites and blogs produced by “the wrong sort of people.” That is why the Republican blogosphere has been overtaken by the socialist-communist blogosphere, just as in the real world, Republicans have been overtaken by socialist/communist/whatevers. Heck, they let the Leftwing MSM switch the color of communism to the color of the Republican Party, without so much as a peep!

2. Because, as Republican writers, the PowerlineBlog trio is scared to death of doing honest reporting or commentary on race, because like yours truly, those who do get called nasty names, like “white nationalist” (by my good friend, Mark Potok, of the SPLC). Thus, even though otherwise safe Fox News broke the story in real time on Election Day 2008, they will wait until such stories have been reported to death elsewhere, and are thus “safe,” before touching them themselves. Which makes them worthless as journalists, and of negative value politically.

* * *
Thanks for the great support many of my readers have so far shown during this, my first fundraising drive. Some readers have even given more than once, in the past three months. I urge my other readers to also sponsor the continuation of my work which, for some strange reason, the New York Times has not seen fit to support, and so that I can do the work that rich, well-connected Republican writers are too cowardly and corrupt to cover, until long after I have done the heavy lifting, and who, more often than not, still get the story wrong! Thanks in advance, for your kind assistance!

Sincerely,

Nicholas Stix