Tuesday, April 20, 2010

CNN Apologist for Genocidal Black Domestic Terrorism, Roland Martin, Calls Confederate Soldiers “Terrorists”


By Nicholas Stix

Black supremacist CNN personality Roland “We Know Our History” Martin has lied on TV, in defense of the racist, mass-murdering Nation of Islam, in claiming that calls for violence by [blood-drenched] NOI leader Minister Louis Farrakhan were “mere rhetoric.” And now, in a symmetry of prevarication, he has insisted to black CNN host Don Lemon of Confederate History Month, “This was a recognition of American terrorists.”



Mr. Martin, was that a criticism or a compliment?

You see, Roland Martin goes gaga over American terrorists of a certain hue.

As I wrote in October,

In October 2007, when Louis Farrakhan called for violence against policemen, racist black CNN propagandist Roland Martin—who in February misrepresented and condemned a non-racial caricature by the New York Post’s Sean Delonas as a “racist” attack on “Barack Obama”—covered for Farrakhan, claiming that the threats were mere “rhetoric.”

MARTIN (to CNN host, Kiran Chetry): But again, but you're also not realizing the history of the Nation of Islam. And so, the Nation of Islam has long, in terms of spoken out or fought against this whole issue of “white oppression.” That is what the appeal of the Nation of Islam is. And when you go back and listen to some of the recordings and speeches of Elijah Muhammad, and you listen to Malcolm X prior to his conversion, when he went to Mecca, and say you're not going to find anything that is different. So, it is not like, it is a surprise when you actually hear the kind of rhetoric. [Or see the bloodshed accompanying it!]


“The history of the Nation of Islam”?! Tell it, Brother Martin!

Martin: So, we can't act as if Cosby is just so different than what Farrakhan is saying. In fact, you're going to find Louis Farrakhan will often—
has been saying the same things about personal responsibility that Bill Cosby is now saying.


(And if Cosby is so similar to Farrakhan, how many murders has Cosby had a hand in, Brother Martin? And when did Cosby become the leader of a mass murder cult?)

Martin has since turned his anti-Confederate oral rant into a column: “Confederates and al-Qaida are the same: terrorists,” a stew of bad analogies and complete cluelessness about both history and the laws of war, in which Martin seems at pains to prove that he knows less than my 10-year-old.

One thing that Martin’s rant also proves is that he is eminently qualified to be a tenured, full professor of “African-American Studies.”

As some of Martin’s readers pointed out, there was nothing about the Confederate Army’s conduct that could be described as “terrorist,” but much that the Union Army did, especially under generals Sherman and Sheridan, that was terroristic.

Perhaps Martin should adopt a more appropriate name, say, “Roland 17X Martin,” in honor of Lewis 17X Dupree, the high-level member of Louis Farrakhan’s Harlem mosque who murdered NYPD Patrolman Philip Cardillo in an ambush, on April 14, 1972.

See also:

“Dismantling America (contd.): Guess What Flag's Not Coming To Dinner,” by Sam Francis;

“Abolishing America (contd.): GOP’s Gilmore Surrenders over Confederate History Month...,” by Sam Francis;


“Abolishing America (contd.): Confederate = Nazi?,”
by Sam Francis;


“Southern Heritage Issues Still Winnable,” by Sam Francis;

“The New Intolerance—Hatred of the South is Hatred of America,” by Pat Buchanan; and

“Ponnuru, McDonnell and the Great Virginia Grovel—if They Won't Stand Up for the South, They Won’t Stand Up for America,” by Ellison Lodge.

1 comment:

  1. Roland Martin makes me very ill upon seeing him and or hearing him.

    This was beautifully accurate:

    "As some of Martin’s readers pointed out, there was nothing about the Confederate Army’s conduct that could be described as 'terrorist,' but much that the Union Army did, especially under generals Sherman and Sheridan, that was terroristic."

    Some historians act as if the Confederate cause was fueled by a meager handful of "rebels" in the minority; the entire nation was divided. Many men and women chose to support the side of the Confederacy.

    Nicholas, I enjoyed this, thanks.

    ReplyDelete