Wednesday, November 05, 2025
A MILLION COMMIES DID NOT SHOW UP AT THE "GET RID OF TRUMP" RALLY--A FEW THOUSAND, AT BEST
Anonymous said...
A MILLION COMMIES DID NOT SHOW UP AT THE "GET RID OF TRUMP" RALLY--A FEW THOUSAND, AT BEST
WASHINGTON (AP) — An anti-fascism protest in Washington, D.C., planned weeks ago to mark the one-year anniversary since President Donald Trump was elected took on added vigor Wednesday, fueled by a night of sweeping wins by Democrats in prominent races around the country.
Several thousand people, energized by the results, carried signs, wore costumes and chanted: “Trump must go now!” The protest began in the shadow of the Washington Monument and was the first large anti-Trump gathering since Tuesday’s elections.
“You hope you never have to come here to protest but they are breaking the Constitution,” said Thomas Oliver 75, who took the train from the Philadelphia area to participate. He said the outcome of the elections Tuesday night signaled that American voters are paying attention.
The gathering was organized by more than three dozen partners, including Refuse Fascism and the Handmaid Army DC, whose members dressed as characters in red cloaks and white bonnets from Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel, “The Handmaid’s Tale,” and the eponymous TV series.
Music blared from a stage, as protesters held signs that read “impeach,” “convict” and “remove.”
GRA:Then they went home and decided if they were going to wear a dress that night or men's attire.
--GRA
Wednesday, November 5, 2025 at 11:54:00 PM EST
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
O'REILLY PREDICTION ON TARIFFS:SCOTUS WILL RULE THAT P.T. CAN "UNILATERALLY IMPOSE TARIFFS."
PLUS ONE MORE CRAZY PREDICTION
GRA:We've heard the last two days from msm that SCOTUS is "hostile" to Trump administration lawyers about the tariff case. Msm is rooting for a Trump defeat about tariffs so much,that they've collectively wet their Depends,anticipating a Trump loss.
Bill O'Reilly claimed if Trump loses the case,"the stock market(Dow Jones)will drop 5,000 points in one day."(12%)
I would think the opposite.
His reasoning is that world economics are so "used to this new system of tariffs,that to dismantle it,would be catastrophic."
O'Reilly then predicted SCOTUS WOULD uphold the president's right to impose tariffs.
SCOTUS HAS been backing P T. more than 90% of the time and maybe that's the only number that matters. A lot of "experts" have made good arguments for a ruling of "no tariffs",unless imposed by Congress.
Where's my coin?
--GRA
MORE SCOTUS:THEY RULE IN FAVOR OF PRESIDENT TRUMP'S ORDER THAT TRANNIES MUST LIST THEIR
GENDER AT BIRTH ON PASSPORT APPLICATIONS;KAGAN,SOTOMAYER AND KETANJI UBANGI JUMANJI BROWN JACKSON DISSENTED ANGRILY
(Jonathan Turley)In this opinion, the Court rejects the rulings of U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick, a biden appointee in Massachusetts, and the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on the injunction of the policy. Both courts would have forced the Trump Administration to issue passports to transgender and nonbinary Americans that reflect the sex designation of their choosing.
However, the Court ruled that “Displaying passport holders’ sex at birth no more offends equal protection principles than displaying their country of birth—in both cases, the Government is merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment.”
GRA:Another idiotic lawsuit discarded. The three commie,female judges had a collective fit,though the negress--especially--showed her stupidity by arguing against the decision.
--GRA
EVEN MORE SCOTUS:GAY MARRIAGE OVERTURNED?(WOULDNT IT BE NICE?)
WASHINGTON (AP) — A call to overturn the landmark Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide is on the agenda Friday for the justices’ closed-door conference.
Among the new cases the justices are expected to consider is a longshot appeal from Kim Davis, the former Kentucky court clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples following the court’s 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges.
Davis had been trying to get the court to overturn a lower court order for her to pay $360,000 in damages and attorney’s fees to a couple whom she denied a marriage license.
The justices could say as early as Monday what they’ll do.
In urging the court to take up her case, Davis’ lawyers repeatedly invoked the words of Justice Clarence Thomas, who alone among the nine justices has called for erasing the same-sex marriage ruling.
Thomas was one of four dissenting justices in 2015. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito are the other dissenters who also remain on the court.
Roberts has been silent on the subject since he wrote a dissenting opinion in the case. Alito has continued to criticize the decision, but said recently he was not advocating that it be overturned.
GRA:With P.T. in office,this may be the only chance for SCOTUS to do the right thing and put gays back in the closet. It isn't "normal" behavior and leads to other depravities,like acquiring kids via adoption, or scientific meddling. The worst part of it all is those poor kids must then get raised in a perverted home(not to mention,being abused).These gay "couples" are freaks,with a totally different viewpoint about child raising. Look at Rosie O'Donnell's kids for proof of the failure of gay parenthood. Many more.
Wouldn't it be nice,if gay marriage was outlawed?
--GRA
Post a Comment