racist, african negro murders six-year-old White boy, attempts to murder his sister, and is then found not guilty due to insanity; after serving 10 years, he is released but is quickly re-arrested for failure to register as a felon

By Jerry PDX
Friday, October 10, 2025 at 12:55:00 PM EDT Spotted this headline on msn:

"kentucky man who killed 6-year-old boy in 2015 arrested in florida 1 week after early release"

The headlines should read this:

"racist, african negro murders six-year-old White boy, attempts to murder his sister, and is then found not guilty due to insanity. After serving 10 years, he is released but is quickly re-arrested for failure to register as a felon."

According to the article, he was found not guilty of the murder, due to insanity but found guilty of the brutal assaults on the rest of the family.

WTF?! Did I read that right? I had to read it again to make sure.

He gets excused for murdering a six-year-old boy, due to some kind of [fake] mental issue, but not excused for the crime of assault on other members of the family he attacked. Insanity suggests somebody can't control what he does, so he isn't responsible, so why wouldn't his insanity also excuse the assault he committed, along with the murder? Or conversely, if he was sane enough to be responsible for "mere" assault, why isn't he sane enough to be responsible for actual murder? What kind of bizarro reasoning is laid out in those court documents that make any kind of sense out of this? I can only imagine.

He was sentenced to 20 years, and served 10. He deserved the death penalty, but that's not going to happen. His lawyer will always play the crazy card, no matter what evil he will do when he gets back on the streets. Guaranteed, he's not done--the lawyers, judges, and system that are protecting him have the blood of his future victims on their hands.