Timeline of Crooks’ movements (believe it or not), prior to his assassination attempt on President Trump—Part II (The incompetence part vs. the evil part) (#62)

[“FUBAR: Complete timeline of Thomas Crooks’ movements before assassination attempt (believe it or not), Part One”]

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
tuesday, july 16, 2024 at 11:54:00 a.m. edt

“(zh) the assassination attempt has pitted the ussc against local law enforcement – with agency director Kimberly Cheatle telling abc news on monday that it was the local police’s responsibility to secure the building that was outside the ussc perimeter.

“‘there was local police in that building – there was local police in the area that were responsible for the outer perimeter of the building,’ said Cheatle.

“one former secret service agent, however, took issue with Cheatle placing so much blame on local law enforcement – telling cnn: ‘the service [ss] is responsible for everything, not just the inner perimeter. they should make sure all of this is covered.

“‘officers inside a building – that’s not mitigating a high-ground vulnerability,’ the former agent continued.

“according to Patrick Yoes, national president of the fraternal order of police, this isn’t the snipers’ fault.

“‘whatever happened in Butler, this was not a failure of the local, state or federal officers on the ground who responded to the shots fired at former [sic] President Trump. They acted heroically and put their lives on the line to protect everyone at the event and we must recognize that,’ he said. ‘this is a failure at the management or command level who failed to secure an obvious weakness in the security of this event.’”

GRA: The lack of response is being peddled as incompetence, and NO ONE in the msm is offering the other possibility: Intentional indifference to a threat. The local cops attempted to confront Crooks—and failed—THAT was incompetence.

Not taking down someone on a roof, with a clear vision of the stage where President Trump was speaking, is something much more sinister—and it needs to be discussed openly. Taking Crooks’ picture numerous times over a prolonged period of time and not acting on his suspicious activity narrows who was responsible down to one or two secret service personnel, in charge of directing responses—including grabbing Crooks as he was circling the building. Whoever THAT person is, is your guilty party. Now, my favorite: What was HIS MOTIVE in failing to stop, question, and apprehend Crooks before he did his damage?

--GRA