Sunday, August 6, 2023 at 05:03:14 PM EDT
Clown World: Stockton Police Open Investigation into 7-Eleven Staff for Assault After They Beat the Shoplifter Who Threatened to Shoot Them
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/clown-world-stockton-police-open-investigation-7-eleven/
Mandatory these days.Crime must be allowed to happen--if perpetrated by blacks.What's a Chinaman to do?
ReplyDelete--GRA
Hopefully if charged and indicted the two Sikh will be cleared by jury nullification.
ReplyDeletejerry pdx
ReplyDeleteWhat I was worried about when I first saw this, he hadn't left the store yet so technically hadn't shoplifted yet. Of course, even if he had left the store they might be in trouble because it's just material stuff and you could end a man's life beating him like that, and what a valuable life that is...Also, as we've learned from Jordan Neely, threats of violence are just words, they don't mean thing when it comes to black criminals so we have to endure their threats until they do something physically.
Great beating! Should be standard for every thief caught. Mistake was putting it on the internet. As the government no longer holds this kind of criminal accountable, victims need to do so.
ReplyDelete"so technically hadn't shoplifted yet"
ReplyDeleteYouTube is full of videos showing shoplifters being detained inside stores -- many of these places have video surveillance and employ "loss prevention" people specifically to do that.
Even if he had left the store, the problem here would still be the assault.
Retail outlets handle shoplifting differently. Some just stop them, take the merchandise that was about to be stolen, and allow the person to leave, telling them not to come back (or visit any other store if it's a chain). Others call the cops and prosecute. Recently many seem to have adopted non-intervention policies, telling employees not to intervene at all.
Charges in this case are unlikely. The thief wasn't injured.
jerry pdx
ReplyDelete"Even if he left the store the problem here would still be the assault"
Yeah, duh. OK, so the master nitpicker decides to suggest I was "wrong" about something because I didn't run down every possible scenario. So yeah, of course assault is still on the table "even" if he left the store with the goods. I was only pointing out he had two defenses to the assault which were that he was trying to stop a shoplifter or the guy made verbal threats. How that plays out in court can depend on the judge, jury or DA who may decide to politicize this because the shoplifter was black. Well, since the shopkeepers were not White, it's less likely for that to happen but it still could.
"Retail outlets handle shoplifting differently"
Again, DUH! We already know that but how many of those situations involve a store employee pulling out a stick and beating the shoplifter? In cases where violence that extreme breaks out you could be dealing with a lawsuit so you'd at least want him to have left the store to establish he was actually shoplifting. Probably not enough to justify an attack like that legally but it's better than nothing. Again, how all that would play out in court can depend on a lot of factors but the expense and hassle of dealing with this sort of thing is likely the reason retailers simply adopt a hands off no intervention policy.