PayPal

Wednesday, June 06, 2018

D-Day, Sixth of June: The 74th Anniversary of Operation Overlord, the World's Largest Amphibious Invasion (The Ultimate Web Presentation, with Articles, and Scores of Photographs and Maps)

 


 


 


 














D-Day: The Final Overlord Plan for the Normandy Invasion
 


 


D-Day: RAF guys painting invasion aircraft stripes
 


D-Day, British fly boys on the ground, prior to the invasion
 


D-Day: The 101st Airborne
 

“A paratrooper boards an airplane that will drop him over the coast of Normandy for the Allied Invasion of Europe, D-Day, June 6, 1944. Soldiers of the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions parachuted behind enemy lines during the night, while fellow Soldiers assaulted Normandy beaches at dawn.” [N.S. Note how heavily-laden the paratrooper is with arms and supplies.]
 


D-Day: Airborne troops, in line to jump 


D-Day: A Waco CG-4A U.S. Army Air Force assault glider
 

D-Day: a +1000 Aerial Armada (including troop-carrying gliders) to take back occupied Europe
By Richard Clements
June 6, 2012
The Aviationist.com

At 22.15 on the evening of Jun. 5 1944, the first engine on the first plane spluttered into life announcing the biggest airborne operation ever undertaken: delayed by 24 hours due to poor weather conditions, the Allied forces were about to take back occupied Europe.

That night, some 13,000 U.S airborne troops comprising of the 82nd and 101st Airborne divisions were to be transported in a vast fleet of 925 DC-3 Dakotas along with the British 6th Airborne Division (some 6,000 strong) and Canada’s 1st Parachute Battalion (some 500 in strength), over the English channel to the Cotentin Peninsula (Normandy).

Also a further 5,000 troops were transported into combat in some 700 gliders. Two were the main types of gliders used in the action. The first was the Waco CG-4A, a U.S designed and built assault glider which had first taken to the air during 1942 and became the most numerous built glider of WWII with about 13,900 examples built.

The other type used was the British Built and designed Airspeed Horsa Glider; smaller than the CG-4, the Horsa first flew in on Sept. 12, 1941 and was first used operationally in Operation Husky, the invasion of Sicily. It could carry a squad of 25 troops with a later Mk2 version being larger with a hinged nose so that a Jeep could be carried.

Both Gliders were basically a wooden frame covered in a wax covered fabric to keep weight to a minimum; no armoured protection here, it meant that furniture manufacturers could assemble parts of the glider in vast numbers quickly.

The 1000+ fleet had the issue of flying in the dark without lights so mid-air collisions were a big risk. To minimise this, all aircraft took off from dozens of airfields all over southern England and used an air corridor that took them south to the Island of Guernsey where they then turned east and over the combat area.

Navigation was still in its infancy and was not very accurate and, once over France, the airborne troops were scattered. Because of the poor navigation and heavy flak that the aircraft encountered prior to their respective drop zones many airborne troops found themselves miles from their intended drop zone.

Many of the troops were killed whilst still in the air swinging from their chute; others drowned when they landed in flooded fields and were weighed down by the vast amount if [sic] kit that they wearing at the time.

Those that survived the jump found themselves on their own and had to form groups and fight objectives that they hadn’t trained for. Their ultimate objective was to secure an area inland from the landing beaches so that a beach head could be established.

Eventually, as history states, they succeeded. But at a huge cost.

The glider-borne troops proved to be very effective, the large “Barn Door” flaps on the Horsa Glider gave it a very high rate of descent allowing the glider to be landed in a confined space.

A good example of this is that during the night of Jun. 5 and 6, 1944 a force of 181 men took off from RAF Tarrant Rushton Dorset, Southern England in Six Horsa Gliders with the task to capture Pegasus Bridge and its sister bridge a few hundred yards east, over the River Orne.

The operation was aimed to stop German armor attacking the landing forces and to capture the two strategically important bridges to cover the eastern flank of “Sword,” one of the landing beaches.

Five of the six gliders landed within 50 yards of the objective taking the defending German forces by complete surprise and completed their task within 10 minutes with the loss of two men.

That night, the sight of vast swarms of troop-carrying aircraft must have been impressive. Their overpowering numbers gave the Allied forces the upper hand.

Richard Clements for TheAviationist.com

 


D-Day: A bomber from the 416th Bomb Group dropping its load
 


 


 

By Nicholas Stix
June 6, 2015
June 6, 2013
June 6, 2010, 8:58 a.m.
Revised at 11:58 p.m., Sunday, June 6, 2010.
Revised and expanded at 1:10 a.m., on Wednesday, June 6, 2012.
Last revised and expanded at 2:03 a.m., on Thursday, June 6, 2013.

Today, we commemorate the 71st anniversary of the largest amphibious attack in the history of the world, the landing of between 160,000 and 175,000 Allied troops on the coast of Normandy, France. These fighting men were supported yet another 195,000 sailors on 5,000 ships.

 


 


D-Day infantrymen jumping out of three landing craft
 

D-Day troops just out of a landing craft at Omaha Beach
 



* * *
 
Gen. George S. Patton, old blood and guts, wearing four stars, not long before his death in a motor vehicle accident in occupied Bavaria
 

Gen. George S. Patton’s Speech on the Eve of D-Day

[“This is the full text of the speech Gen. Patton made prior to D-Day. The date was 5 June, 1944. Please be advised it is quite profane.” George C. Scott performed a shorter, cleaned-up version of this speech at the beginning of the movie Patton (1970).

General Patton:

Be seated.

Men, this stuff that some sources sling around about America wanting out of this war, not wanting to fight, is a crock of bullshit.

Americans love to fight, traditionally. All real Americans love the sting and clash of battle.

You are here today for three reasons. First, because you are here to defend your homes and your loved ones. Second, you are here for your own self-respect, because you would not want to be anywhere else. Third, you are here because you are real men, and all real men like to fight.

When you, here, everyone of you, were kids, you all admired the champion marble player, the fastest runner, the toughest boxer, the big league ballplayers, and the All-American football players. Americans love a winner. Americans will not tolerate a loser. Americans despise cowards.

Americans play to win all of the time. I wouldn't give a hoot in hell for a man who lost and laughed. That's why Americans have never lost, nor will ever lose a war; for the very idea of losing is hateful to an American.

You are not all going to die. Only two percent of you right here today would die in a major battle. Death must not be feared. Death, in time, comes to all men. Yes, every man is scared in his first battle. If he says he's not, he's a liar. Some men are cowards but they fight the same as the brave men, or they get the hell slammed out of them watching men fight who are just as scared as they are.

The real hero is the man who fights, even though he is scared.

Some men get over their fright in a minute under fire. For some, it takes an hour. For some, it takes days. But a real man will never let his fear of death overpower his honor, his sense of duty to his country, and his innate manhood. Battle is the most magnificent competition in which a human being can indulge. It brings out all that is best and it removes all that is base. Americans pride themselves on being He-Men and they ARE He-Men.

Remember that the enemy is just as frightened as you are, and probably more so. They are not supermen.

All through your Army careers, you men have bitched about what you call “chicken shit drilling.” That, like everything else in this Army, has a definite purpose. That purpose is alertness. Alertness must be bred into every soldier. I don't give a fuck for a man who's not always on his toes. You men are veterans, or you wouldn't be here. You are ready for what's to come. A man must be alert at all times, if he expects to stay alive. If you're not alert, sometime, a German son-of-an-asshole-bitch is going to sneak up behind you and beat you to death with a sockful of shit!

There are four hundred neatly marked graves somewhere in Sicily, all because one man went to sleep on the job. But they are German graves, because we caught the bastard asleep before they did.

An Army is a team. It lives, sleeps, eats and fights as a team. This individual heroic stuff is pure horseshit. The bilious bastards who write that kind of stuff for the Saturday Evening Post don't know any more about real fighting under fire than they know about fucking! We have the finest food, the finest equipment, the best spirit, and the best men in the world. Why, by God, I actually pity those poor sons-of-bitches we're going up against. By God, I do.

My men don't surrender, and I don't want to hear of any soldier under my command being captured, unless he has been hit. Even if you are hit, you can still fight back. That's not just bullshit, either. The kind of man that I want in my command is just like the lieutenant in Libya, who, with a Luger against his chest, jerked off his helmet, swept the gun aside with one hand, and busted the hell out of the Kraut with his helmet. Then he jumped on the gun and went out and killed another German before they knew what the hell was coming off. And, all of that time, this man had a bullet through a lung. There was a real man!

All of the real heroes are not storybook combat fighters, either. Every single man in this Army plays a vital role. Don't ever let up. Don't ever think that your job is unimportant. Every man has a job to do and he must do it. Every man is a vital link in the great chain.

What if every truck driver suddenly decided that he didn't like the whine of those shells overhead, turned yellow, and jumped headlong into a ditch? The cowardly bastard could say, “Hell, they won't miss me, just one man in thousands.” But, what if every man thought that way? Where in the hell would we be now? What would our country, our loved ones, our homes, even the world, be like?

No, Goddamnit, Americans don't think like that. Every man does his job. Every man serves the whole. Every department, every unit, is important in the vast scheme of this war.

The ordnance men are needed to supply the guns and machinery of war to keep us rolling. The Quartermaster is needed to bring up food and clothes because where we are going there isn't a hell of a lot to steal. Every last man on K.P. has a job to do, even the one who heats our water to keep us from getting the “G.I. Shits.”

Each man must not think only of himself, but also of his buddy fighting beside him. We don't want yellow cowards in this Army. They should be killed off like rats. If not, they will go home after this war and breed more cowards. The brave men will breed more brave men. Kill off the Goddamned cowards and we will have a nation of brave men.

One of the bravest men that I ever saw was a fellow on top of a telegraph pole in the midst of a furious firefight in Tunisia. I stopped and asked what the hell he was doing up there at a time like that. He answered, “Fixing the wire, Sir.” I asked, “Isn't that a little unhealthy right about now?” He answered, “Yes Sir, but the Goddamned wire has to be fixed.” I asked, “Don't those planes strafing the road bother you?” And he answered, “No, Sir, but you sure as hell do!” Now, there was a real man. A real soldier. There was a man who devoted all he had to his duty, no matter how seemingly insignificant his duty might appear at the time, no matter how great the odds.

And you should have seen those trucks on the road to Tunisia. Those drivers were magnificent. All day and all night they rolled over those son-of-a-bitching roads, never stopping, never faltering from their course, with shells bursting all around them all of the time. We got through on good old American guts. Many of those men drove for over forty consecutive hours. These men weren't combat men, but they were soldiers with a job to do. They did it, and in one hell of a way they did it. They were part of a team. Without team effort, without them, the fight would have been lost. All of the links in the chain pulled together, and the chain became unbreakable.

Don't forget, you men don't know that I'm here. No mention of that fact is to be made in any letters. The world is not supposed to know what the hell happened to me. I'm not supposed to be commanding this Army. I'm not even supposed to be here in England. Let the first bastards to find out be the Goddamned Germans. Some day, I want to see them raise up on their piss-soaked hind legs and howl, “Jesus Christ, it's the Goddamned Third Army again and that son-of-a-fucking-bitch Patton. We want to get the hell over there.” The quicker we clean up this Goddamned mess, the quicker we can take a little jaunt against the purple pissing Japs and clean out their nest, too. Before the Goddamned Marines get all of the credit.

Sure, we want to go home. We want this war over with. The quickest way to get it over with is to go get the bastards who started it. The quicker they are whipped, the quicker we can go home. The shortest way home is through Berlin and Tokyo. And when we get to Berlin, I am personally going to shoot that paper hanging son-of-a-bitch Hitler. Just like I'd shoot a snake!

When a man is lying in a shell hole, if he just stays there all day, a German will get to him eventually. The hell with that idea. The hell with taking it. My men don't dig foxholes. I don't want them to. Foxholes only slow up an offensive. Keep moving. And don't give the enemy time to dig one, either. We'll win this war, but we'll win it only by fighting and by showing the Germans that we've got more guts than they have, or ever will have.

We're not going to just shoot the sons-of-bitches, we're going to rip out their living Goddamned guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We're going to murder those lousy Hun cocksuckers by the bushel-fucking-basket. War is a bloody, killing business. You've got to spill their blood, or they will spill yours. Rip them up the belly. Shoot them in the guts. When shells are hitting all around you and you wipe the dirt off your face and realize that instead of dirt it's the blood and guts of what once was your best friend beside you … you'll know what to do!

I don't want to get any messages saying, “I am holding my position.” We are not holding a Goddamned thing. Let the Germans do that. We are advancing constantly and we are not interested in holding onto anything, except the enemy's balls. We are going to twist his balls and kick the living shit out of him all of the time. Our basic plan of operation is to advance and to keep on advancing, regardless of whether we have to go over, under, or through the enemy. We are going to go through him like crap through a goose; like shit through a tin horn!

From time to time there will be some complaints that we are pushing our people too hard. I don't give a good Goddamn about such complaints. I believe in the old and sound rule that an ounce of sweat will save a gallon of blood. The harder WE push, the more Germans we will kill. The more Germans we kill, the fewer of our men will be killed. Pushing means fewer casualties. I want you all to remember that.

There is one great thing that you men will all be able to say after this war is over and you are home once again. You may be thankful that twenty years from now when you are sitting by the fireplace with your grandson on your knee and he asks you what you did in the great World War II, you WON'T have to cough, shift him to the other knee and say, “Well, your Granddaddy shoveled shit in Louisiana.” No, Sir, you can look him straight in the eye and say, “Son, your Granddaddy rode with the Great Third Army and a Son-of-a-Goddamned-Bitch named Georgie Patton!”


* * *
 
“Ike” addressing American troops on D-Day (General of the Army—as in five stars—Dwight David Eisenhower). “Supreme Allied Commander U.S. Army Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower speaks with 101st Airborne Division paratroopers before they board airplanes and gliders to take part in a parachute assault into Normandy as part of the Allied Invasion of Europe, D-Day, June 6, 1944.”
 

General Eisenhower’s Message Sent Just Prior to the Invasion

Hit this link to listen to General Eisenhower’s Message Below (click the ‘play’ arrow to begin the message)

Transcript:

Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen of the Allied Expeditionary Force! You are about to embark upon a great crusade, toward which we have striven these many months. The eyes of the world are upon you. The hopes and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you. In company with our brave Allies and brothers-in-arms on other fronts, you will bring about the destruction of the German war machine, the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed peoples of Europe, and security for ourselves in a free world.

Your task will not be an easy one. Your enemy is well trained, well equipped and battle hardened, he will fight savagely.

But this is the year 1944! Much has happened since the Nazi triumphs of 1940-41. The United Nations have inflicted upon the Germans great defeats, in open battle, man to man. Our air offensive has seriously reduced their strength in the air and their capacity to wage war on the ground. Our home fronts have given us an overwhelming superiority in weapons and munitions of war, and placed at our disposal great reserves of trained fighting men. The tide has turned! The free men of the world are marching together to victory!

I have full confidence in your courage, devotion to duty, and skill in battle. We will accept nothing less than full victory!

Good luck! And let us all beseech the blessings of Almighty God upon this great and noble undertaking.

-- Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower
 


 


 

Lest we forget.

The Army’s D-Day Web site.

D-Day Airborne and Beach Assault


Plan for the airborne assault, which preceded the amphibious invasion
 

The airborne assault into Normandy as part of the D-Day Allied invasion of Europe was the largest use of airborne troops up to that time. Paratroopers of the U.S. 82d and 101st Airborne divisions, the British 6th Airborne Division, the 1st Canadian Parachute Battalion, and other attached Allied units took part in the assault.

Numbering more than 13,000 men, the paratroopers were flown from bases in southern England to the Cotentin Peninsula in approximately 925 C-47 airplanes. An additional 4,000 men, consisting of glider infantry with supporting weapons and medical and signal units, were to arrive in 500 gliders later on D-Day to reinforce the paratroopers. The parachute troops were assigned what was probably the most difficult task of the initial operation—a night jump behind enemy lines five hours before the coastal landings.

To protect the invasion zone's western extremity and to facilitate the "Utah" landing force's movement into the Cotentin Peninsula, the U.S. 82nd and 101st Airborne divisions descended on the peninsula by parachute and glider in the early hours of D-Day. The paratroopers were badly scattered. Many were injured and killed during the attack, and much of their equipment was lost. But the brave paratroopers fought fiercely, causing confusion among the German commanders and keeping the Germans troops occupied. Their efforts, hampered by harsh weather, darkness, and disorganization, and initiative of resourceful soldiers and leaders, ensured that the UTAH BEACH assault objectives were eventually accomplished. The British and Canadian attacks also accomplished their primary goal of securing the left flank of the invasion force.
 

Utah Beach

Utah Beach was added to the initial invasion plan almost as an afterthought. The allies needed a major port as soon as possible, and Utah Beach would put VII (U.S.) Corps within 60 kilometers of Cherbourg at the outset. The major obstacles in this sector were not so much the beach defenses, but the flooded and rough terrain that blocked the way north.

 
Omaha Beach

Omaha Beach linked the U.S. and British beaches. It was a critical link between the Contentin peninsula and the flat plain in front of Caen. Omaha was also the most restricted and heavily defended beach, and for this reason at least one veteran U.S. Division (lst) was tasked to land there. The terrain was difficult. Omaha Beach was unlike any of the other assault beaches in Normandy. Its crescent curve and unusual assortment of bluffs, cliffs and draws were immediately recognizable from the sea.

It was the most defensible beach chosen for D-Day; in fact, many planners did not believe it a likely place for a major landing. The high ground commanded all approaches to the beach from the sea and tidal flats. Moreover, any advance made by U.S. troops from the beach would be limited to narrow passages between the bluffs. Advances directly up the steep bluffs were difficult in the extreme. German strong points were arranged to command all the approaches and pillboxes were sited in the draws to fire east and west, thereby enfilading troops while remaining concealed from bombarding warships. These pillboxes had to be taken out by direct assault.

Compounding this problem was the allied intelligence failure to identify a nearly full-strength infantry division, the 352nd, directly behind the beach. It was believed to be no further forward than St. Lo and Caumont, 20 miles inland.

V (U.S.) Corps was assigned to this sector. The objective was to obtain a lodgment area between Port-en-Bessin and the Vire River and ultimately push forward to St. Lo and Caumont in order to cut German communications (St. Lo was a major road junction). Allocated to the task were 1st and 29th (U.S.) Divisions, supported by the 5th Ranger Battalion and 5th Engineer Special Brigade.
 

Gold Beach

Gold Beach was the objective of the 50th (Northumbrian) Division of the British 2nd Army. Its primary task was to seize Arrolnanches (future site of a Mulberry) and drive inland to seize the road junction at Bayeux, as well as contact U.S. forces on their right and Canadians on their left. The initial opposition was fierce, but the British invasion forces broke through with relatively light casualties and were able to reach their objectives in this sector. A major factor in their success was that the British assault forces were lavishly equipped with armour and "Funnies" of the 79th Armoured Division. The "Funnies" were the specialist vehicles, armed with 290 mm mortars, designed for tasks such as clearing obstacles or minefields and destruction of large fixed fortifications. Perhaps the most famous is the "Flail" tank, which was a Sherman equipped with a large roller to which was attached lengths of chain. These tanks were designed to clear terrain to their front, and detonate mine fields and other booby traps without danger to the tanks or infantry following.
 

Juno Beach

Juno Beach was the landing area for 3rd Canadian Division. The Canadians were very concerned about their role in the invasion (as were most of the planning staff) as the memory of 2nd Canadian Division's destruction at Dieppe was still fresh. But many lessons had been learned, and the 3rd Canadian Division, in spite of heavy opposition at Courselles-sur-Mer, broke through and advanced nearly to their objective, the airfield at Carpiquet, west of Caen. The Canadians made the deepest penetration of any land forces on June 6th, again with moderate casualties.
 

Sword Beach

Sword Beach was the objective of 3rd (British) Infantry Division. They were to advance inland as far as Caen, and line up with British Airborne forces east of the Orne River/Caen Canal. The Orne River bridges had been seized in late at night on the 5th of June by a glider-borne reinforced company commanded by Maj. John Howard.

As at the other beaches, British forces penetrated quite a ways inland after breaking the opposition at water's edge. Unfortunately, the objective of Caen was probably asking too much of a single infantry division, especially given the traffic jams and resistance encountered further inland. 1st Special Service (Commando) brigade commanded by Lord Lovat, linked up in the morning with Howard's force at Pegasus Bridge on the British left. Fierce opposition from the 2lst Panzer and later the 12th SS Panzer division prevented the British from reaching Caen on the 6th.

Indeed, Caen was not taken until late June.

* * *
FDR’s Prayer, Read over the Radio on the Evening of D-Day

My Fellow Americans:

Last night, when I spoke with you about the fall of Rome, I knew at that moment that troops of the United States and our Allies were crossing the Channel in another and greater operation. It has come to pass with success thus far.

And so, in this poignant hour, I ask you to join with me in prayer:

Almighty God: Our sons, pride of our nation, this day have set upon a mighty endeavor, a struggle to preserve our Republic, our religion, and our civilization, and to set free a suffering humanity.

Lead them straight and true; give strength to their arms, stoutness to their hearts, steadfastness in their faith.

They will need Thy blessings. Their road will be long and hard. For the enemy is strong. He may hurl back our forces. Success may not come with rushing speed, but we shall return again and again; and we know that by Thy grace, and by the righteousness of our cause, our sons will triumph.

They will be sore tried, by night and by day, without rest—until the victory is won. The darkness will be rent by noise and flame. Men's souls will be shaken with the violence of war.

For these men are lately drawn from the ways of peace. They fight not for the lust of conquest. They fight to end conquest. They fight to liberate. They fight to let justice arise, and tolerance and goodwill among all Thy people. They yearn but for the end of battle, for their return to the haven of home.

Some will never return. Embrace these, Father, and receive them, Thy heroic servants, into Thy kingdom.

And for us at home -- fathers, mothers, children, wives, sisters, and brothers of brave men overseas, whose thoughts and prayers are ever with them—help us, Almighty God, to rededicate ourselves in renewed faith in Thee in this hour of great sacrifice.

Many people have urged that I call the nation into a single day of special prayer. But because the road is long and the desire is great, I ask that our people devote themselves in a continuance of prayer. As we rise to each new day, and again when each day is spent, let words of prayer be on our lips, invoking Thy help to our efforts.

Give us strength, too—strength in our daily tasks, to redouble the contributions we make in the physical and the material support of our armed forces.

And let our hearts be stout, to wait out the long travail, to bear sorrows that may come, to impart our courage unto our sons wheresoever they may be.

And, O Lord, give us faith. Give us faith in Thee; faith in our sons; faith in each other; faith in our united crusade. Let not the keenness of our spirit ever be dulled. Let not the impacts of temporary events, of temporal matters of but fleeting moment—let not these deter us in our unconquerable purpose.

With Thy blessing, we shall prevail over the unholy forces of our enemy. Help us to conquer the apostles of greed and racial arrogances. Lead us to the saving of our country, and with our sister nations into a world unity that will spell a sure peace—a peace invulnerable to the schemings of unworthy men. And a peace that will let all of men live in freedom, reaping the just rewards of their honest toil.

Thy will be done, Almighty God.

Amen.

Franklin D. Roosevelt – June 6, 1944

 


 


 


Men bogged down on the beach, surrounded by the dead
 


Tending to the dead, on Omaha Beach
 


 

“Hymn to the Fallen” by John Williams, from Saving Private Ryan
 

 
Thanks to generalkenji and Jonathan Maxfield.
 



[For 2011 revision, a tip ‘o the hat to Larry Auster.]

 

Dr W said...

Imagine today's US armed forces attempting such an operation. Blacks, gays, lez-B-friends, Latinos storm the beaches and have their butts kicked by the German teenagers in the 12th SS Panzer Division HJ. After defeating the invasion, the Wehrmacht turns all their forces against the Red Army, which is halted in their tracks.

Thursday, June 6, 2013 at 12:42:00 PM EDT
 

Anonymous said...

" After defeating the invasion, the Wehrmacht turns all their forces against the Red Army, which is halted in their tracks."

I am not so sure of that; the Russkies/ Communists are tough MoFos. Stalingrad, Kursk, the scorched earth defense of the countryside (?Moscow, 1812?), the use of Siberian soldiers which even the Finns said were tougher than your nominal Russkie, the vast quantity of simple to produce tanks vs. the expensive Panthers and Tigers, let alone the manpower losses of the Germans makes that a debatable proposition...

Thursday, June 6, 2013 at 8:51:00 PM EDT

 

Anonymous said...

I could not find anything about the Red Tails nor anything about the brave black units in any of this.

Friday, June 6, 2014 at 12:22:00 PM EDT
 

Nicholas said...

Anonymous Coward,

Well, what do you? Neither could I!

Friday, June 6, 2014 at 1:48:00 PM EDT
 

Nicholas said...

Correction:

Well, what do you know? Neither could I!

Friday, June 6, 2014 at 2:04:00 PM EDT
 

Anonymous said...

My father was in Patton's Third Army during the final push into Germany. He saw Patton once at a post-war ceremony.

An uncle was in the 28th Division surrounded at Bastogne, which Patton helped relieve.

The basketball coach at my high school was in the 101st Airborne and dropped into Normandy. He told my math teacher that the pilots of the C-47 transports would drop the paratroopers as quickly as possible, scattering them, and head back to England for their own safety.

He found himself alone in the darkness in the middle of the German Army and had lost his weapon. He found another on a dead American paratrooper and by a miracle found a group of Airborne men to join up with.

He was always bitter toward the transport pilots who were more concerned about themselves than the men being dropped at night in enemy territory.

David In TN

Saturday, June 7, 2014 at 12:17:00 AM EDT



1 comment:

Anonymous said...
Pegasus Bridge


I--Une Histoire vraie et inédite .
http://www.editions-pantheon.fr/francoise-h.-gondree/essais/pegasus-bridge-le-pont-de-l-espoir.html

2--Un Musée volé - Un scandale à dénoncer
https://www.pegasusbridge.fr/conflit-musee-memorial/

https://www.pegasusbridge.fr/70anniversaire-du-debarquement-le-denomme-comite-darromanches/


3- - Pegasus Bridge, l’usurpation Tome I
http://www.editions-pantheon.fr/a-paraitre/memoires-et-temoignages/pegasus-bridge-l-usurpation-tome-i.html

4--Pegasus Bridge
Radio Courtoisie
Didier Rochard recevait Françoise Gondrée, fondatrice du musée de Pegasus Bridge et présidente de l'ASPEG,

Voilà pour un article
Sommes à votre disposition

Musée de Pegasus Bridge & Batterie de Merville
BP 5
14860 Ranville

www.pegasusbridge.fr

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Many wars are unnecessary.Many are invented for reasons that are wrong and self-serving.

World War 2 was not one of those. All who fought in those two theaters were unselfish and heroic. I always think...what if Hitler had come up with a nuclear bomb first? We wouldn't be here today. Or we'd be wearing swastikas and eating sauerkraut every day. Not many vets around anymore, but we should always appreciate them--and what they accomplished in "the Good War".
---GR Anonymous

Monday, June 6, 2016 at 2:16:00 PM EDT

 

Normandy Landings Video D-Day 1944 [HD Color]

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix
 


 

Blitzkrieg
Published on Jun 5, 2018

The Normandy landings were the landing operations on Tuesday, 6 June 1944 of the Allied invasion of Normandy in Operation Overlord during World War II.

Codenamed Operation Neptune and often referred to as D-Day, it was the largest seaborne invasion in history.

The operation began the liberation of German-occupied northwestern Europe from Nazi control, and laid the foundations of the Allied victory on the Western Front.

Planning for the operation began in 1943. In the months leading up to the invasion, the Allies conducted a substantial military deception, codenamed Operation Bodyguard, to mislead the Germans as to the date and location of the main Allied landings.

The weather on D-Day was far from ideal and the operation had to be delayed 24 hours; a further postponement would have meant a delay of at least two weeks as the invasion planners had requirements for the phase of the moon, the tides, and the time of day that meant only a few days each month were deemed suitable.

Adolf Hitler placed German Field Marshal Erwin Rommel in command of German forces and of developing fortifications along the Atlantic Wall in anticipation of an Allied invasion.

The amphibious landings were preceded by extensive aerial and naval bombardment and an airborne assault—the landing of 24,000 American, British, and Canadian airborne troops shortly after midnight. Allied infantry and armoured divisions began landing on the coast of France at 06:30.

The target 50-mile (80 km) stretch of the Normandy coast was divided into five sectors: Utah, Omaha, Gold, Juno, and Sword. Strong winds blew the landing craft east of their intended positions, particularly at Utah and Omaha.

The men landed under heavy fire from gun emplacements overlooking the beaches, and the shore was mined and covered with obstacles such as wooden stakes, metal tripods, and barbed wire, making the work of the beach-clearing teams difficult and dangerous.

Casualties were heaviest at Omaha, with its high cliffs. At Gold, Juno, and Sword, several fortified towns were cleared in house-to-house fighting, and two major gun emplacements at Gold were disabled, using specialised tanks.

The Allies failed to achieve any of their goals on the first day.

Carentan, St. Lô, and Bayeux remained in German hands, and Caen, a major objective, was not captured until 21 July. Only two of the beaches (Juno and Gold) were linked on the first day, and all five beachheads were not connected until 12 June; however, the operation gained a foothold which the Allies gradually expanded over the coming months.

German casualties on D-Day have been estimated at 4,000 to 9,000 men. Allied casualties were at least 10,000, with 4,414 confirmed dead.

Museums, memorials, and war cemeteries in the area now host many visitors each year.

Breakthrough! Operation Overlord Hits Normandy, France, in Biggest Amphibious Attack in the History of the World! See Complete Documentary!

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix
 

Normandy Surviving D-Day
 


 


Documentary & Video HD
Published on Sep 25, 2014

(Normandy Surviving D-Day Documentary) Five years into World War II, the future of Europe hangs in the balance, as 34,000 US soldiers embark on a mission to launch the biggest attack ever from sea. This fascinating documentary, interviews the soldiers who fought at Omaha, recalling their experiences as they approached the shore line under intense cross fire. Using CGI graphics to recreate and illustrate what happened on D Day, the programme also explores the weaponry used in the first wave of the invasion.Omaha Beach is the code name for one of the five sectors of the Allied invasion of German-occupied France in the Normandy landings on 6 June 1944, during World War II. The beach is located on the coast of Normandy, France, facing the English Channel, and is 5 miles (8 km) long, from east of Sainte-Honorine-des-Pertes to west of Vierville-sur-Mer on the right bank of the Douve River estuary. Landings here were necessary in order to link up the British landings to the east at Gold Beach with the American landing to the west at Utah Beach, thus providing a continuous lodgement on the Normandy coast of the Bay of the Seine. Taking Omaha was to be the responsibility of United States Army troops, with sea transport and naval artillery support provided by the U.S. Navy and elements of the British Royal Navy.


Tuesday, June 05, 2018

Mets Narrowly Avoided Another Heartbreaking Loss Monday Night

 


Have you seen this man in the area of Flushing, Queens? He is to be considered armed with a baseball team and dangerous. He goes by the name Mickey Callaway.
 

By Nicholas Stix

… by having the night off! 

More on Black Mass/Spree Murderer Dwight Jones

[Previously, at WEJB/NSU:

“Phoenix: Yet Another White, Racist, Mass/Spree Murderer?! Not Exactly.”]
 

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
Monday, June 4, 2018 at 7:20:00 P.M. EDT

(ABC NEWS) A man is now linked to the killings of six people over several days in Arizona, police said Monday, and it appears the victims were connected to the suspect's divorce.

Dwight Lamon Jones, 56, died early Monday at an Extended Stay America hotel after a police standoff, officials said. Jones, who allegedly fired at officers, was gassed, and a robot was sent inside, where he later was found dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound, police said.

These actions "reflect the worst of humanity," Maricopa County Sheriff Paul Penzone told reporters Monday.

The fifth and six killings, which authorities announced Monday, took place hours before the suspect's death.

PHOTO: Local police block off and surround a local hotel where a suspect wanted in four killings was staying in Scottsdale, Ariz., June 4, 2018.Ross D. Franklin/AP

Local police block off and surround a local hotel where a suspect wanted in four killings was staying in Scottsdale, Ariz., June 4, 2018.more +
PHOTO: Police surround a hotel where a suspect wanted in multiple killings was staying in Scottsdale, Ariz.on June 4, 2018.Ross D. Franklin/AP

Police surround a hotel where a suspect wanted in multiple killings was staying in Scottsdale, Ariz.on June 4, 2018.

Jones' 2011 divorce with his wife involved fights over money and child-custody issues, and Jones was mandated to have psychiatric evaluation therapy, records showed. One of the people ordered to evaluate Jones was well-known psychologist Dr. Steven Pitt, who is also believed to be the first murder victim connected to Jones, officials said.

Pitt, who consulted with law enforcement on a handful of prominent cases, including the JonBenet Ramsey murder and the Jodi Arias trial, was shot and killed outside his Phoenix office on Thursday night. An eyewitness said he heard Pitt loudly arguing with someone followed by gunshots, according to police.

PHOTO: In this Friday, June 29, 2007, file photo, Dr. Steven Pitt poses in Scottsdale, Ariz. Julio Jimenez/East Valley Tribune via AP, File
In this Friday, June 29, 2007, file photo, Dr. Steven Pitt poses in Scottsdale, Ariz.

Jones' next two alleged victims were paralegals at the law firm Burt Feldman Grenier. A partner at that law office, Elizabeth Feldman, represented Jones' wife, Dr. Connie Jones, in their divorce, according to records.

Jones went to that law firm with the "intent of killing" Feldman, police said.

The paralegals, Veleria Sharp, 48, and Laura Anderson, 49, were shot Friday afternoon. Sharp was spotted running away from the scene, and later she collapsed and died, police said. Anderson was found with a gunshot wound to her chest and later pronounced dead, police said.

Phoenix: Yet Another White, Racist, Mass/Spree Murderer?! Not Exactly

 


A police sketch artist drew this composite picture of a white killer, but police knew the real killer was black
 

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
Monday, June 4, 2018 at 7:06:00 P.M. EDT

More black-on-white crime, as Phoenix mass murderer kills six.

NBC Negro Nightly News, which had showed a composite drawing of a white man as a suspect the last few days, in the deaths of six Phoenix area residents—including a counselor and others associated with a mental health facility—reported that a black man, Dwight Lamon Jones, was cornered by police a few hours ago.

Jones killed himself.

NBC theorized that Jones was having a contentious divorce and during the course of the last week, shot and murdered three mental health employees and a counselor that his estranged wife was seeing.

[Actually, the contentious divorce took place from 2010-2011.]

There was another double murder committed today that officials connected to Jones, as well. It appeared that most (if not all) of the vics were white.

NBC had the black guy’s face on-air for a grand total of three seconds.

 


A 2009 mug shot of Dwight Lamon Jones

 

Ann Coulter on the Death of Journalism

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix



American Pie, Yes; Fudgepacker Cake, No

By Grand Rapids Anonymous
Monday, June 4, 2018 at 10:40:00 A.M. EDT

Speaking of “American Pie,” SCOTUS (unbelievably) rules in favor of baker who refused to make a cake for gays getting married.
(CNBC) The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a narrow victory to a Christian baker from Colorado who refused for religious reasons to make a wedding cake for a gay couple.

The justices, in a 7-2 decision, faulted the Colorado Civil Rights Commission's handling of the claims brought against Jack Phillips, saying it had showed a hostility to religion.

The commission said Phillips violated the Colorado anti-discrimination law that bars businesses from refusing service based on race, sex, marital status or sexual orientation by rebuffing gay couple David Mullins and Charlie Craig.
GRA: So they allow gay marriage, but don't want them to have cake at it (chuckle). Surprising decision, but the analysis is that people can refuse to serve gays based on religious principles—in this narrow example. Now, can gays be refused service at a restaurant? And why not? Interesting.
 

N.S.: If you’re looking for consistency from the Supremes, forget it. In Brown v. [Topeka] Board of Education (1954), the U.S. Supreme Court made it clear that it did not support forced integration. But after lower courts ignored and defied it, in ordering forced public school busing for racial balance, the Supreme Court supported forced busing, without ever admitting that that the lower courts had defied it, or that it was reversing itself (Raymond Wolters, The Burden of Brown).

By the way: Forced busing never ended. It has continued under linguistic legerdemain. It is now forced by school districts, rather than the federal courts, and disguised by the euphemism, "voluntary."
 

GRA
Monday, June 4, 2018 at 11:06:00 A.M. EDT

“Now let me get this STRAIGHT. I don't have to make fudgepacker cake anymore?”—Anonymous bakers all across the country
 

GRA
Monday, June 4, 2018 at 1:41:00 P.M. EDT

The post-game analyses by Napolitano and others are suggesting that this SCOTUS ruling paves the way for individual business owners to decide what type of customers they want to serve.

Cavuto: "What if an owner doesn't want to serve a bi-racial person? Would this ruling allow that to happen?"

Napolitano: "I think the door has been opened for that possibility."

Which would lead to neighborhoods becoming more homogeneous—and better. I don't understand how the SCOTUS decided this case, this way—based on a long history of inclusion*—but it will be fascinating to view the ramifications.

[*GRA is used “inclusion” in its conventional sense.]


Monday, June 04, 2018

Don McLean: “American Pie” (Audio, with Lyrics)

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix
 

lukutiss1324
Published on Aug 14, 2008

 

 

Words & Music by Don McLean

Long, long time ago...
I can still remember,
How that music used to make me smile,
And I knew if I had my chance,
That I could make those people dance,
And maybe, they'd be happy … for a while.

But February made me shiver,
With every paper I'd deliver,
Bad news on the doorstep,
I couldn't take one more step.

I can't remember if I cried,
When I read about his widowed bride,
But something touched me deep inside,
The day the music died.

So bye-bye, Miss American Pie,
Drove my Chevy to the levee,
But the levee was dry,
Them good old boys were drinkin’ whiskey and rye,
Singin,’ “This'll be the day that I die,
“This'll be the day that I die.”

Did you write the book of love,
And do you have faith in God above,
If the Bible tells you so?
Do you believe in rock 'n roll,
Can music save your mortal soul,
And can you teach me how to dance real slow?

Well, I know that you’re in love with him
‘cause I saw you dancin’ in the gym,
You both kicked off your shoes,
Man, I dig those rhythm and blues.

I was a lonely teenage broncin’ buck,
With a pink carnation and a pickup truck,
But I knew I was out of luck,
The day the music died.

I started singin,’
“Bye-bye, Miss American Pie,”
Drove my Chevy to the levee,
But the levee was dry,
Them good old boys were drinkin’ whiskey and rye,
And singin,’ “This’ll be the day that I die.
“This’ll be the day that I die."

Now for ten years we’ve been on our own,
And moss grows fat on a rollin’ stone,
But that’s not how it used to be,
When the jester sang for the King and Queen,
In a coat he borrowed from James Dean,
And a voice that came from you and me,

Oh, and while the king was looking down,
The jester stole his thorny crown,
The courtroom was adjourned,
No verdict was returned,
And while Lennon read a book of Marx,
The quartet practiced in the park,
And we sang dirges in the dark,
The day the music died.

We were singing,
“Bye-bye, Miss American Pie,”
Drove my Chevy to the levee,
But the levee was dry.
Them good old boys were drinkin’ whiskey and rye,
And singin,’ “This’ll be the day that I die,”
“This'll be the day that I die.”

Helter skelter in summer swelter,
The birds flew off with a fallout shelter,
Eight miles high and falling fast,
It landed foul on the grass,
The players tried for a forward pass,
With the jester on the sidelines in a cast.

Now the half-time air was sweet perfume,
While the sergeants played a marching tune,
We all got up to dance,
Oh, but we never got the chance!
‘cause the players tried to take the field,
The marching band refused to yield,
Do you recall what was revealed,
The day the music died?

We started singing,
“Bye-bye, Miss American Pie,”
Drove my Chevy to the levee,
But the levee was dry,
Them good old boys were drinkin’ whiskey and rye,
And singin,’ “This'll be the day that I die.
“This'll be the day that I die.”

Oh, and there we were all in one place,
A generation lost in space,
With no time left to start again,
So come on: Jack be nimble, Jack be quick!
Jack flash sat on a candlestick,
Cause fire is the Devil's only friend.

Oh, and as I watched him on the stage,
My hands were clenched in fists of rage,
No angel born in hell,
Could break that Satan’s spell,
And as flames climbed high into the night,
To light the sacrificial rite,
I saw Satan laughing with delight,
The day the music died.

He was singing,
“Bye-bye, Miss American Pie.”
Drove my Chevy to the levee,
But the levee was dry,
Them good old boys were drinkin’ whiskey and rye,
And singin,’ “This’ll be the day that I die.”
“This'll be the day that I die.”

I met a girl who sang the blues,
And I asked her for some happy news,
But she just smiled and turned away,
I went down to the sacred store,
Where I'd heard the music years before,
But the man there said the music wouldn't play.

And in the streets the children screamed,
The lovers cried, and the poets dreamed,
But not a word was spoken,
The church bells all were broken,

And the three men I admire most,
The father, son, and the holy ghost,
They caught the last train for the coast,
The day the music died.

And they were singing,
“Bye-bye, Miss American Pie,”
Drove my Chevy to the levee,
But the levee was dry,
And them good old boys were drinkin’ whiskey and rye,
Singin,’ “This’ll be the day that I die.”
“This’ll be the day that I die.”

They were singing,
“Bye-bye, Miss American Pie,”
Drove my Chevy to the levee,
But the levee was dry,
Them good old boys were drinkin’ whiskey and rye,
Singin,’ “This’ll be the day that I die.”


Don McLean (1945-) was inspired to write “American Pie” by the death of rock and roll singer-songwriter Buddy Holly, in a plane crash that also took the lives of young singer Ritchie Valens (“La Bamba”), the Big Bopper, and pilot Roger Peterson, on February 3, 1959.

The single was released in November 1971, and shot to the top of the charts, where it remained for four weeks. I heard it hundreds of times played on radios for months, and never tired of it. I am sure that it sold at least two million singles, but have tried repeatedly to determine its sales, without any luck. I do know that the song , though nominated for Grammies for Song and Record of the Year, lost out in both cases to “The First Time ever I Saw Your Face.”

Don McLean was obsessed with artists, and thus wrote his follow-up song, “Vincent,” about artist Vincent van Gogh (1853-1890).

It bombed.

This broke the composer’s heart, and practically ended his composing career. At least, he did not follow the example of his artistic hero, and the aging McLean has periodically given concerts for his aging but loyal fans.



A Treasury of Pat Buchanan Columns: A Free “E-Book”

By Nicholas Stix

It is my opinion that Pat Buchanan is America’s most brilliant living political thinker.

Buchanan has written a score of brilliant books, and thousands of equally brilliant columns, the latter at the rate of two per week for (I believe) over 30 years.

I don’t mean to suggest that everything Pat Buchanan touches turns to gold, but he’s got an awfully high batting average.

The other day, when I posted a recent Buchanan column on race, one of my great reader-researchers, Grand Rapids Anonymous, quoted form an earlier one from 2013 on the same topic. I went hunting for the original column, which led me, eventually, to Buchanan.org

This is Mr. B’s own Web site, which contains about five columns per month, since 1997, and a handful going back beyond that to 1990. Thus, it’s not complete, but it’s the closest we’re going to get.

In case anyone forgets to bookmark the link, or loses it, I’ve permanently linked to the page in my blog roll on the right hand side of this page.

Pat Buchanan’s Column Archive.

Sunday, June 03, 2018

Las Vegas Police Named Kamari Collins, 18, as a Suspect in the Shooting Murder and Burglary at a Northwest Valley Home; a Second Suspect was Identified Only as a 17-Year-Old

 

War crime victim Sheri Aoyagi (either the police or the Las Vegas Review Journal refused to publish any mug shots of the two suspects, including Kamari Collins, 18)
 

By A Texas Reader
 

Suspect ID’d in fatal shooting of woman in northwest Las Vegas

One of two people arrested in the Wednesday shooting death of a 60-year-old woman has been identified. Las Vegas police named Kamari Collins, 18, as a suspect.

www.reviewjournal.com
 

"It's the blecks," said the South African.

Italian Populist Leaders at Rally to Invaders: “It’s Time to Pack Your Bags”

By Reader-Researcher R.C.

At The Gateway Pundit.

N.S.: The racial socialist definition of a “populist”: Nazi. The real definition: A politician who claims to support the vital interests of his nation’s patriotic citizens.
 

Peter, Paul & Mary: “Leaving on a Jet Plane”
 


 

White Feminist Judge Declares, ‘Free Child Rapes for Swarthy, Muslim Immigrants!’ (Affirmative Action Criminal Justice)

 

Two Dangerous Felons


Child Rapist Ahmed Hamir Ahmed
 



Judge Nan G. Waller
 

By Jerry PDX
Sunday, June 3, 2018 at 3:42:00 P.M. EDT

We've had another local diversity sexual assault on a child in my city and the sitting judge on the case has decided the perp is too mentally ill to be guilty, so she dismissed all criminal charges against him:

At The Oregonian.

Name of the criminal: Ahmed Hamir Ahmed (no word on his citizenship/immigration status)

Name of the other criminal, er...I mean the judge: Nan Waller

Care to guess the race of the two? Yes, Mr. Ahmed is a negro Muslim and "judge" Nan Walker is a white female. Yes, yet another white female in a position of power protecting non-white male criminals. After all, you have to keep that pool of available non-white men filled with potential prospects. Here is a photo of "judge" Waller. Shocker, she happens to be a corpulent white female.

This from the Oregonian article:

"Multnomah County Circuit Judge Nan Waller instead committed Ahmed Hadir Ahmed to the Oregon State Hospital for at least two years under a rarely used state law for “extremely dangerous mentally ill” defendants facing murder, rape or other serious allegations."

So if he cannot be treated, then he may be in the psychiatric hospital indefinitely but if he's gaming the system and pretending to be crazy, or is "cured" by treatment, then he could be out in as little as two years, all the sooner for a certain overweight female judge to be able to possibly date this fine figure of a prospective mate.

I seriously question the "crazy" designation because most men loony enough to not be responsible for their acts couldn't even manage a meth dealing business or manipulate 13-year-olds that well, but when you have underlying motives as a judge, you'll believe what you want to believe. Of course, you can find examples of white male judges also serving as diversity operatives and protecting these negro/muslim/paki scumbags, but it seems like every other one you see in the news is a white or black female judge.

From what I've read, the number of females entering the legal practice has exploded the last couple of decades and there will be even more female judges than male in the future, so we can expect the judicial system to become even more lenient toward young, non-white male criminals (especially sex criminals; those are the ones that really give them tingles).

With Five Dead, and Nearly 200 Sick in E. coli Outbreak from Lettuce, See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil Investigators are Stumped!

Sun, Jun 3, 2018 2:59 p.m.
By A Texas Reader
 

Five dead, nearly 200 sick in E. coli outbreak from lettuce. And investigators are stumped.
The FDA has not been able to link the outbreak to one farm, processor or distributor.
www.nola.com


ATR: I'm not stumped.

Bedfellows: Communist and Nazi Bloggers Celebrate Destroying the Life of Jewish Trump Supporter’s Family

 

Communist Huffington Post blogger Luke O’Brien and his victim, Amy Mekelberg
 

By Nicholas Stix

Media thugs like Luke O’Brien have some of my readers so (justifiably) terrified, that they now forbid me to even say what continent they live on!

At The Liberty Conservative.

Mekelburg’s Twitter feed, with her response.

Saturday, June 02, 2018

Now-Unveiled Emails Recently Obtained by Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) Contains Shocking Revelations about Collusion between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and...

By Reader-Researcher R.C.


At Natural News.


Bing: 1 Man Dead, Another in Critical Condition after PG County Double Shooting

Sat, Jun 2, 2018 4:10 p.m.
By Prince George’s County Ex-Pat

1 man dead, another in critical condition after PG County double shooting, police say | WJLA

At WJLA.

The Knapsack of Lies: Political Pornography: The Complete Text of Peggy McIntosh’s 1988 Racial and Sexual Blood Libels

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix
 

WHITE PRIVILEGE AND MALE PRIVILEGE:
A Personal Account of Coming to See Correspondences Through Work in Women's Studies (1988)
By Peggy McIntosh

Through work to bring materials and perspectives from Women's Studies into the rest of the curriculum, I have often noticed men's unwillingness to grant that they are over privileged in the curriculum, even though they may grant that women are disadvantaged. Denials that amount to taboos surround the subject of advantages that men gain from women's disadvantages. These denials protect male privilege from being fully recognized, acknowledged, lessened, or ended.

Thinking through unacknowledged male privilege as a phenomenon with a life of its own, I realized that since hierarchies in our society are interlocking, there was most likely a phenomenon of white privilege that was similarly denied and protected, but alive and real in its effects. As a white person, I realized I had been taught about racism as something that puts others at a disadvantage, but had been taught not to see one of its
corollary aspects, white privilege, which puts me at an advantage. I think whites are carefully taught not to recognize white privilege, as males are taught not to recognize male privilege. So I have begun in an untutored way to ask what it is like to have white privilege. This paper is a partial record of my personal observations and not a scholarly analysis. It is based on my daily experiences within my particular circumstances.

I have come to see white privilege as an invisible package of unearned assets that I can count on cashing in each day, but about which I was "meant" to remain oblivious. White privilege is like an invisible weightless knapsack of special provisions, assurances, tools, maps, guides, codebooks,
passports, visas, clothes, compass, emergency gear, and blank checks.

Since I have had trouble facing white privilege, and describing its results in my life, I saw parallels here with men's reluctance to acknowledge male privilege. Only rarely will a man go beyond acknowledging that women are disadvantaged to acknowledging that men have unearned advantage, or that unearned privilege has not been good for men's development as human beings, or for society's development, or that privilege systems might ever be challenged and changed.

I will review here several types or layers of denial that I see at work protecting, and preventing awareness about, entrenched male privilege. Then I will draw parallels, from my own experience, with the denials that veil the facts of white privilege. Finally, I will list forty-six ordinary and daily ways in which I experience having white privilege, by contrast with my African American colleagues in the same building. This list is not intended to be generalizable. Other s can make their own lists from within their own life circumstances.

Writing this paper has been difficult, despite warm receptions for the talks on which it is based. For describing white privilege makes one newly accountable. As we in Women's Studies work reveal male privilege and ask men to give up some of their power, so one who writes about having white privilege must ask, "Having described it, what will I do to lessen or end it?"

The denial of men's over privileged state takes many forms in discussions of curriculum change work. Some claim that men must be central in the curriculum because they have done most of what is important or distinctive in life or in civilization. Some recognize sexism in the curriculum but deny that it makes male students seem unduly important in life. Others agree that certain individual thinkers are male oriented but deny that there is any systemic tendency in disciplinary frameworks or epistemology to over empower men as a group. Those men who do grant that male privilege takes institutionalized and embedded forms are still likely to deny that male hegemony has opened doors for them personally. Virtually all men deny that male over reward alone can explain men's centrality in all the inner sanctums of our most powerful institutions. Moreover, those few who will acknowledge that male privilege systems have over empowered them usually end up doubting that we could dismantle these privilege systems. They may say they will work to improve Women's status, in the society or in the university, but they can't or won't support the idea of lessening men's. In curricular terms, this is the point at which they say that they regret they cannot use any of the interesting new scholarship on women because the syllabus is full. When the talk turns to giving men less cultural room, even the most thoughtful and fair-minded of the men I know will tend to reflect, or fall back on, conservative assumptions about the inevitability of present gender relations and distributions of power, calling on precedent or sociobiology and psychobiology to demonstrate that male domination is natural and follows inevitably from evolutionary pressures. Others resort to arguments from "experience" or religion or social responsibility or wishing and dreaming. [Series of straw men.]

After I realized, through faculty development work in Women's Studies, the extent to which men work from a base of unacknowledged privilege, I understood that much of their oppressiveness was unconscious. Then I remembered the frequent charges from women of color that white women whom they encounter are oppressive. I began to understand why we are justly seen as oppressive, even when we don't see ourselves that way. At the very least, obliviousness of one's privileged state can make a person or group irritating to be with. [Unlike blacks!] I began to count the ways in which I enjoy unearned skin privilege and have been conditioned into oblivion about its existence, unable to see that it put me "ahead" in any way, or put my people ahead, over-rewarding us and yet also paradoxically damaging us, or that it could or should be changed. My schooling gave me no training in seeing myself as an oppressor, as an unfairly advantaged person, or as a participant in a damaged culture. I was taught to see myself as an individual whose moral state depended on her individual moral will.

At school, we were not taught about slavery in any depth; we were not taught to see slaveholders as damaged people. Slaves were seen as the only group at risk of being dehumanized. My schooling followed the pattern which Elizabeth Minnich has pointed out: whites are taught to think of their lives as morally neutral, normative, and average, and also ideal, so that when we work to benefit others, this is seen as work that will allow "them" to be more like "us." [Blacks demanded integrated schools, based on the notion that they could and would meet white standards of intellect and conduct.] I think many of us know how obnoxious this attitude can be in men.

After frustration with men who would not recognize male privilege, I decided to try to work on myself at least by identifying some of the daily effects of white privilege in my life. It is crude work, at this stage, but I will give here a list of special circumstances and conditions I experience that I did not earn but that I have been made to feel are mine by birth, by citizenship, and by virtue of being a conscientious law-abiding "normal" person of goodwill. I have chosen those conditions that I think in my case attach somewhat more to skin-color privilege than to class, religion, ethnic status, or geographical location, though these other privileging factors are intricately intertwined. As far as I can see, my Afro-American co-workers, friends, and acquaintances with whom I come into daily or frequent contact in this particular time, place, and line of work cannot count on most of these conditions.

1. I can, if I wish, arrange to be in the company of people of my race most of the time.
2. I can avoid spending time with people whom I was trained to mistrust and who have learned to mistrust my kind or me.
3. If I should need to move, I can be pretty sure of renting or purchasing housing in an area which I can afford and in which I would want to live.
4. I can be reasonably sure that my neighbors in such a location will be neutral or pleasant to me.
5. I can go shopping alone most of the time, fairly well assured that I will not be followed or harassed by store detectives.
6. I can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of my race widely and positively represented.
7. When I am told about our national heritage or about "civilization," I am shown that people of my color made it what it is.
8. I can be sure that my children will be given curricular materials that testify to the existence of their race.
9. If I want to, I can be pretty sure of finding a publisher for this piece on white privilege.
10. I can be fairly sure of having my voice heard in a group in which I am the only member of my race.
11. I can be casual about whether or not to listen to another woman's voice in a group in which she is the only member of her race.
12. I can go into a book shop and count on finding the writing of my race
represented, into a supermarket and find the staple foods that fit with my cultural traditions, into a hairdresser's shop and find someone who can deal with my hair.
13. Whether I use checks, credit cards, or cash, I can count on my skin color not to work against the appearance that I am financially reliable.
14. I could arrange to protect our young children most of the time from people who might not like them.
15. I did not have to educate our children to be aware of systemic racism for their own daily physical protection.
16. I can be pretty sure that my children's teachers and employers will tolerate them if they fit school and workplace norms; my chief worries about them do not concern others' attitudes toward their race.
17. I can talk with my mouth full and not have people put this down to my color.
18. I can swear, or dress in secondhand clothes, or not answer letters, without having people attribute these choices to the bad morals, the poverty, or the illiteracy of my race.
19. I can speak in public to a powerful male group without putting my race on trial.
20. I can do well in a challenging situation without being called a credit to my race.
21. I am never asked to speak for all the people of my racial group.
22. I can remain oblivious to the language and customs of persons of color who constitute the world's majority without feeling in my culture any penalty for such oblivion.
23. I can criticize our government and talk about how much I fear its policies and behavior without being seen as a cultural outsider.
24. I can be reasonably sure that if I ask to talk to "the person in charge," I will be facing a person of my race.
25. If a traffic cop pulls me over or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven't been singled out because of my race.
26. I can easily buy posters, postcards, picture books, greeting cards, dolls, toys, and children's magazines featuring people of my race.
27. I can go home from most meetings of organizations I belong to feeling somewhat tied in, rather than isolated, out of place, outnumbered,
unheard, held at a distance, or feared.
28. I can be pretty sure that an argument with a colleague of another race is more likely to jeopardize her chances for advancement than to jeopardize mine.
29. I can be fairly sure that if I argue for the promotion of a person of another race, or a program centering on race, this is not likely to cost me heavily within my present setting, even if my colleagues disagree with me.
30. If I declare there is a racial issue at hand, or there isn't a racial issue at hand, my race will lend me more credibility for either position than a person of color will have.
31. I can choose to ignore developments in minority writing and minority activist programs, or disparage them, or learn from them, but in any case, I can find ways to be more or less protected from negative consequences of any of these choices.
32. My culture gives me little fear about ignoring the perspectives and powers of people of other races.
33. I am not made acutely aware that my shape, bearing, or body odor will be taken as a reflection on my race.
34. I can worry about racism without being seen as self-interested or selfseeking.
35. I can take a job with an affirmative action employer without having my
co-workers on the job suspect that I got it because of my race.
36. If my day, week, or year is going badly, I need not ask of each negative episode or situation whether it has racial overtones.
37. I can be pretty sure of finding people who would be willing to talk with me and advise me about my next steps, professionally.
38. I can think over many options, social, political, imaginative, or professional, without asking whether a person of my race would be accepted or allowed to do what I want to do.
39. I can be late to a meeting without having the lateness reflect on my race.
40. I can choose public accommodation without fearing that people of my race cannot get in or will be mistreated in the places I have chosen.
41. I can be sure that if I need legal or medical help, my race will not work against me.
42. I can arrange my activities so that I will never have to experience feelings of rejection owing to my race.
43. If I have low credibility as a leader, I can be sure that my race is not the problem.
44. I can easily find academic courses and institutions that give attention only to people of my race.
45. I can expect figurative language and imagery in all of the arts to testify to experiences of my race.
46. I can choose blemish cover or bandages in "flesh" color and have them more or less match my skin.

I repeatedly forgot each of the realizations on this list until I wrote it down. For me, white privilege has turned out to be an elusive and fugitive subject. [She came up with 46 examples of “an elusive and fugitive subject”?] The pressure to avoid it is great, for in facing it I must give up the myth of meritocracy. [It wasn’t a myth before passage of the U.S. Civil Rights Act in 1964. It was people like McIntosh who turned meritocracy into a myth.] If these things are true, this is not such a free country; one's life is not what one makes it [Amen, sister!]; many doors open for certain people through no virtues of their own. These perceptions mean also that my moral condition is not what I had been led to believe. The appearance of being a good citizen rather than a troublemaker comes in large part from having all sorts of doors open automatically because of my color.

A further paralysis of nerve comes from literary silence protecting privilege. My clearest memories of finding such analysis are in Lillian Smith's unparalleled Killers of the Dream and Margaret Andersen's review of Karen and Mamie Fields' Lemon Swamp. Smith, for example, wrote about walking toward black children on the street and knowing they would step into the gutter; Andersen contrasted the pleasure that she, as a white child, took on summer driving trips to the south with Karen Fields' memories of driving in a closed car stocked with all necessities lest, in stopping, her black family should suffer "insult, or worse." Adrienne Rich also recognizes and writes about daily experiences of privilege, but in my observation, white women's writing in this area is far more often on systemic racism than on our daily lives as light-skinned women.

In unpacking this invisible knapsack of white privilege, I have listed conditions of daily experience that I once took for granted, as neutral, normal, and universally available to everybody, just as I once thought of a male-focused curriculum as the neutral or accurate account that can speak for all. Nor did I think of any of these perquisites as bad for the holder. I now think that we need a more finely differentiated taxonomy of privilege, for some of these varieties are only what one would want for everyone in a just society, and others give license to be ignorant, oblivious, arrogant, and destructive. Before proposing some more finely tuned categorization, I will make some observations about the general effects of these conditions on my life and expectations.

In this potpourri of examples, some privileges make me feel at home in the world. Others allow me to escape penalties or dangers that others suffer. Through some, I escape fear, anxiety, insult, injury, or a sense of not being welcome, not being real. Some keep me from having to hide, to be in disguise, to feel sick or crazy, to negotiate each transaction from the position of being an outsider or, within my group, a person who is suspected of having too close links with a dominant culture. Most keep me from having to be angry.

I see a pattern running through the matrix of white privilege, a pattern of assumptions that were passed on to me as a white person. There was one main piece of cultural turf; it was my own turf, and I was among those who could control the turf. I could measure up to the cultural standards and take advantage of the many options I saw around me to make what the culture would call a success of my life. My skin color was an asset for any move I was educated to want to make. I could think of myself as "belonging" in major ways and of making social systems work for me. I could freely disparage, fear, neglect, or be oblivious to anything outside of the dominant cultural forms. Being of the main culture, I could also criticize it fairly freely. My life was reflected back to me frequently enough so that I felt, with regard to my race, if not to my sex, like one of the real people.

Whether through the curriculum or in the newspaper, the television, the economic system, or the general look of people in the streets, I received daily signals and indications that my people counted and that others either didn't exist or must be trying, not very successfully, to be like people of my race. I was given cultural permission not to hear voices of people of other races or a tepid cultural tolerance for hearing or acting on such voices. I was also raised not to suffer seriously from anything that darker-skinned people might say about my group, "protected," though perhaps I should more accurately say prohibited, through the habits of my economic class and social group, from living in racially mixed groups or being reflective about interactions between people of differing races. In proportion as my racial group was being made confident, comfortable, and oblivious, other groups were likely being made unconfident, uncomfortable, and alienated. Whiteness protected me from many kinds of hostility, distress, and violence, which I was being subtly trained to visit in turn upon people of color.

For this reason, the word "privilege" now seems to me misleading. Its connotations are too positive to fit the conditions and behaviors which "privilege systems" produce. We usually think of privilege as being a favored state, whether earned, or conferred by birth or luck. School graduates are reminded they are privileged and urged to use their (enviable) assets well. The word "privilege" carries the connotation of being something everyone must want. Yet some of the conditions I have described here work to systemically over-empower certain groups. Such privilege simply confers dominance, gives permission to control, because of one's race or sex.

The kind of privilege that gives license to some people to be, at best, thoughtless and, at worst, murderous should not continue to be referred to as a desirable attribute. Such "privilege" may be widely desired without being in any way beneficial to the whole society. Moreover, though "privilege" may confer power, it does not confer moral strength.

Those who do not depend on conferred dominance have traits and qualities that may never develop in those who do. Just as Women's Studies courses indicate that women survive their political [?!] circumstances to lead lives that hold the human race together, so "underprivileged" people of color who are the world's majority have survived their oppression and lived survivors' [!] lives from which the white global minority can and must learn. In some groups, those dominated have actually become strong through not having all of these unearned advantages, and this gives them a great deal to teach the others. [About what?! How to be stupid, corrupt, and violent? How to rape and murder girls and women?] Members of so-called privileged groups can seem foolish, ridiculous, infantile, or dangerous by contrast. I want, then, to distinguish between earned strength and unearned power conferred systemically. Power from unearned privilege can look like strength when it is, in fact, permission to escape or to dominate.

But not all of the privileges on my list are inevitably damaging. Some, like the expectation that neighbors will be decent to you, or that your race will not count against you in court, should be the norm in a just society and should be considered as the entitlement of everyone. Others, like the privilege not to listen to less powerful people, distort the humanity of the. holders as well as the ignored groups. Still others, like finding one's staple foods everywhere, may be a function of being a member of a numerical majority in the population. Others have to do with not having to labor under pervasive negative stereotyping and mythology [?].

We might at least start by distinguishing between positive advantages that we can work to spread, to the point where they are not advantages at all but simply part of the normal civic and social fabric, and negative types of advantage that unless rejected will always reinforce our present hierarchies.
For example, the positive "privilege" of belonging, the feeling that one belongs within the human circle, as Native Americans [Garbage; there are no “Native American” sayings; each Indian tribe has its own sayings] say, fosters development and should not be seen as privilege for a few. It is, let us say, an entitlement that none of us should have to earn; ideally it is an unearned entitlement.

At present, since only a few have it, it is an unearned advantage for them. The negative "privilege" that gave me cultural permission not to take darker-skinned Others seriously can be seen as arbitrarily conferred dominance and should not be desirable for anyone.

This paper results from a process of coming to see that some of the power that I originally saw as attendant on being a human being in the United States consisted in unearned advantage and conferred dominance, as well as other kinds of special circumstance not universally taken for granted.

In writing this paper I have also realized that white identity and status (as well as class identity and status) give me considerable power to choose whether to broach this subject and its trouble. I can pretty well decide whether to disappear and avoid and not listen and escape the dislike I may engender in other people through this essay, or interrupt, answer, interpret, preach, correct, criticize, and control to some extent what goes on in reaction to it. Being white, I am given considerable power to escape many kinds of danger or penalty as well as to choose which risks I want to take.

There is an analogy here, once again, with Women's Studies. Our male colleagues do not have a great deal to lose in supporting Women's Studies, but they do not have a great deal to lose if they oppose it either. They simply have the power to decide whether to commit themselves to more equitable distributions of power. They will probably feel few penalties whatever choice they make; they do not seem, in any obvious short-term sense, the ones at risk, though they and we are all at risk because of the behaviors that have been rewarded in them.

Through Women's Studies work I have met very few men who are truly distressed about systemic, unearned male advantage and conferred dominance. And so one question for me and others like me is whether we will be like them, or whether we will get truly distressed, even outraged, about unearned race advantage and conferred dominance and if so, what we will do to lessen them. In any case, we need to do more work in identifying how they actually affect our daily lives. We need more down-to-earth writing by people about these taboo subjects. We need more understanding of the ways in which white "privilege" damages white people, for these are not the same ways in which it damages the victimized. Skewed white psyches are an inseparable part of the picture, though I do not want to confuse the kinds of damage done to the holders of special assets and to those who suffer the deficits. Many, perhaps most, of our white students in the United States think that racism doesn't affect them because they are not people of color; they do not see "whiteness" as a racial identity. Many men likewise think that Women's Studies does not bear on their own existences because they are not female; they do not see themselves as having gendered identities: Insisting on the universal "effects" of "privilege" systems, then, becomes one of our chief tasks, and being more explicit about the particular effects in particular contexts is anther. Men need to join us in this work.

In addition, since race and sex are not the only advantaging systems at work, we need to similarly examine the daily experience of having age
advantage, or ethnic advantage, or physical ability, or advantage related to nationality, religion, or sexual orientation.

Professor Marnie Evans suggested to me that in many ways the list I made also applies directly to heterosexual privilege. This is a still more taboo subject than race privilege: the daily ways in which heterosexual privilege makes some persons comfortable or powerful, providing supports, assets, approvals, and rewards to those who live or expect to live in heterosexual pairs. Unpacking that content is still more difficult, owing to the deeper imbeddedness [sic] of heterosexual advantage and dominance and stricter taboos surrounding these. But to start such an analysis I would put this observation from my own experience: the fact that I live under the same roof with a man triggers all kinds of societal assumptions about my worth, politics, life, and values and triggers a host of unearned advantages and powers. After recasting many elements from the original list I would add further observations like these:

1. My children do not have to answer questions about why I live with my partner (my husband).
2. I have no difficulty finding neighborhoods where people approve of our household.
3. Our children are given texts and classes that implicitly support our kind of family unit and do not turn them against my choice of domestic partnership [?].
4. I can travel alone or with my husband without expecting embarrassment or hostility in those who deal with us.
5. Most people I meet will see my marital arrangements as an asset to my life or as a favorable comment on my likeability, my competence, or my mental health.
6. I can talk about the social events of a weekend without fearing most listeners' reactions.
7. I will feel welcomed and "normal" in the usual walks of public life,
institutional and social.
8. In many contexts, I am seen as "all right" in daily work on women because I do not live chiefly with women.

Difficulties and dangers surrounding the task of finding parallels are many. Since racism, sexism, and heterosexism are not the same, the advantages associated with them should not be seen as the same. In addition, it is hard to isolate aspects of unearned advantage that derive chiefly from social class, economic class, race, religion, region, sex, or ethnic identity. The oppressions are both distinct and interlocking, as the Combahee River Collective statement of 1977 continues to remind us eloquently.

One factor seems clear about all of the interlocking oppressions. They take both active forms that we can see and embedded forms that members of the dominant group are taught not to see. In my class and place, I did not see myself as racist-,because I was taught to recognize racism only in individual acts of meanness by members of my group, never in invisible systems conferring racial dominance on my group from birth.

Likewise, we are taught to think that sexism or heterosexism is carried on only through intentional, individual acts of discrimination, meanness, or cruelty, rather than in invisible systems conferring unsought dominance on certain groups. Disapproving of the systems won't be enough to change them. I was taught to think that racism could end if white individuals changed their attitudes; many men think sexism can be ended by individual changes in daily behavior toward women. But a man's sex provides advantage for him whether or not he approves of the way in which dominance has been conferred on his group. A "white" skin in the United States opens many doors for whites whether or not we approve of the way dominance has been conferred on us. Individual acts can palliate, but cannot end, these problems. To redesign social systems, we need first to acknowledge their colossal unseen dimensions. The silences and denials surrounding privilege are the key political tool here. They keep the thinking about equality or equity incomplete, protecting unearned advantage and conferred dominance by making these taboo subjects. Most talk by whites about equal opportunity seems to me now to be about equal opportunity to try to get into a position of dominance while denying that systems of dominance exist.

Obliviousness about white advantage, like obliviousness about male advantage, is kept strongly inculturated in the United States so as to maintain the myth of meritocracy, the myth that democratic choice is equally available to all. Keeping most people unaware that freedom of confident action is there for just a small number of people props up those in power and serves to keep power in the hands of the same groups that have most of it already.

Though systemic change takes many decades, there are pressing questions for me and I imagine for some others like me if we raise our daily consciousness on the perquisites of being light-skinned. What will we do with such knowledge? As we know from watching men, it is an open question whether we will choose to use unearned advantage to weaken invisible privilege systems and whether we will use any of our arbitrarily awarded power to try to reconstruct power systems on a broader base.

 

The Parallax View: The Propaganda Movie Within the Movie

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix
 



Friday, June 01, 2018

TCM's Film Noir of the Week at Midnight ET Saturday Night-Sunday Morning (and 10 a.m. Sunday) is The Letter (1940), starring Bette Davis in One of Her Greatest Roles!

 

 

By David in TN
Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 10:36:00 P.M. EDT
 

 

TCM's Film Noir of the Week at Midnight ET Saturday Night-Sunday Morning (and 10 a.m. Sunday) is The Letter (1940).

 

Bette Davis and a sap
 

This is one of Bette Davis' best roles. She plays the unfaithful wife a rubber plantation manager in what appears to be Malaya, circa 1930. The film begins with Davis emptying a revolver into a man she claims was sexually assaulting her.
 

Davis between two saps
 

The police don't believe it, and arrest her for murder. James Stephenson plays her lawyer-family friend who is approached by blackmailers with a letter indicating the man she killed was her lover.
 

Davis between three saps
 

Stephenson reluctantly breaks ethical rules and buys the letter from the victim's Eurasian wife, played by Gale Sondergaard. The plot is a complex mystery.
 

Trailer
 

Davis and Herbert Marshall between scenes
 

Bette Davis chews the scenery with Stephenson, the conflicted attorney, Herbert Marshall as the cuckolded husband, and Victor Sen Young, as Stephenson's tricky sometimes assistant.
 

 

 

The Letter repeats at 10 a.m. ET Sunday morning, June 3.

 

 

Name Change Proposal for the FBI

 


Stefan Halper
 

By orinocoflow 12 days ago

This is a great article from the Daily Wire. It IS a bombshell. The FBI had its own spy working inside the Trump campaign, a certain Stefan Halper. Jonah Goldberg and David French will approve of him. He can now get a job writing for National Review, at 200K a year.

The FBI is no longer above politics, since many years. Change its name to "Political State Police," or Postapo. It is part of the Deep State that serves the interests of the hostile elite. The Deep State acts against the American people, and against the national interest.

Pat Buchanan: Is White America Really Black America’s Biggest Problem?

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix
 

Is America’s Racial Divide Permanent?
By Patrick J. Buchanan
Friday - June 1, 2018 at 12:05 a.m.
Buchanan.org

For Roseanne Barr, star of ABC’s hit show “Roseanne,” there would be no appeal. When her tweet hit, she was gone.

“Roseanne’s Twitter statement, is abhorrent, repugnant and inconsistent with our values, and we have decided to cancel her show,” declaimed Channing Dungey, the black president of ABC Entertainment.

Targeting Valerie Jarrett, a confidante and aide of President Barack Obama, Roseanne had tweeted: If the “muslim brotherhood & the planet of the apes had a baby=vj.”

Offensive, juvenile, crude, but was that not pretty much the job description ABC had in mind for the role of Roseanne in the show?

Roseanne also tweeted that George Soros, 87-year-old radical-liberal billionaire, had been a Nazi “who turned in his fellow Jews 2 be murdered in German concentration camps and stole their wealth.”

The Soros slur seems far more savage than the dumb racial joke about Jarrett, but it was the latter that got Roseanne canned.

Her firing came the same day that 175,000 employees of 8,000 Starbucks’s stores were undergoing four hours of instruction to heighten their racial sensitivities.

These training sessions, said The Washington Post, “marked the start of Starbucks’ years-long commitment to new diversity and sensitivity programs after two African-Americans were arrested at a Philadelphia Starbucks on April 12.”

The Philly Starbucks manager, a woman, had called the cops when the two black men she took to be loiterers refused to leave.

Rachel Siegel of the Post describes the four-hour session:

“At first the employees are prompted to find differences. They watched a video in which (Starbucks head) Howard Schultz talks about his vision for a more inclusive company and country. They reflected what a place of belonging means to them. And they examine their own biases.

“Each group viewed a documentary underwritten by Starbucks and directed by Stanley Nelson. In the film people of color talk about experiences of being followed in stores. Footage from the civil rights movement quickly progresses to 21st-century cellphone videos capturing people being dragged off a plane, threatened in a New York deli and choked at a North Carolina Waffle House.”

Have something to say about this column?

On reading this, the terms “Orwellian” and “re-education camp” come to mind.

Earlier in May, the NFL issued a rule saying players who refuse to stand for the national anthem must remain in the locker room. If they take a knee on the field this coming season, they can be punished and the team fined.

Great was the outrage when this ruling came. The First Amendment rights of black players were being brutally trampled upon.

Yet the NFL has always had restrictions on behavior, from evicting players from the game for unsportsmanlike conduct to curtailing end-zone dances.

What is the common thread that runs through these social clashes from just this last month?

It is race. Each episode fits neatly into the great media narrative of an irredeemably racist America of white oppressors and black victims.

Had it been two white guys hanging out in that Philly Starbucks, who were told by the manager to buy a cup of coffee or get out, the spat would never have become a national story.

These incidents, coming as they do 50 years after the historic advances in civil rights, induce a deep pessimism that this country will ever escape from the endlessly boiling cauldron of racial conflict.

Today, because of cellphone videos, social media, 24-hour cable and the subsequent nationalization of even the most trivial incidents, our national conversation is more suffused than ever with matters of race.

For many, race has become a constant preoccupation.

And in each of these incidents and disputes, the country divides along the familiar fault lines, and the accusations and arguments go on and on until a new incident engenders a new argument.

The America of the 1960s, with its civil rights clashes and “long hot summers,” was a far more segregated society than today. Yet the toxic charge of “racist” is far more common now.

And how much do these conversations correspond to the real crisis of black America? Here is a sentence culled from another Post story this week:
“Three fatal shootings …over the Memorial Day weekend brought the (Ward 8 total) to 30 homicides so far this year.”

Are white cops really the problem in Ward 8, Anacostia, when 30 people in that black community have been shot or stabbed to death in the first five months of 2018?

Washington, D.C., spends more per student than almost any other school district. Yet the test scores of vast numbers of black kids have already fallen below “proficiency” levels by the time they reach fourth and eighth grade, and the high school truancies have reached scandalous levels.

How does ABC’s cashiering of “Roseanne,” or apologies to the two guys at Starbucks, or restrictions on the rights of millionaire NFL players to kneel during our national anthem address the real crisis?

Is white America really black America’s biggest problem?