tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200494.post1166447887072601747..comments2024-03-28T02:45:54.016-04:00Comments on Nicholas Stix, Uncensored: Could Almost Half of Rape Allegations be False?Nicholashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12372393717833610657noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200494.post-71118139962227432892014-11-30T00:56:26.894-05:002014-11-30T00:56:26.894-05:00A friend of mine was raped early one morning on he...A friend of mine was raped early one morning on her way to work. She refused to report it.She didn't go to the police. She feared getting involved in going to court. Years ago it was believed that rape was under reported. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200494.post-26364051527013097972014-11-29T11:30:47.408-05:002014-11-29T11:30:47.408-05:00There was a recent local story of a popular bike s...There was a recent local story of a popular bike shop being burglarized. Nothing big, but there were hidden cameras around there and the perps were filmed and later identified; the area is dark in the evening. The story did, in passing, mention the cameras came in handy some months prior when a women claimed she was sexual assaulted behind the place at night. The cameras showed it was consensual so that was a lucky break for the target.<br />In contrast there's also the recent story of Chicago man Stanley Wrice. He was on all the news as an innocent man released after serving 32 years in prison for kidnapping, torture and rape. He only confessed, along with his confederates, because they were tortured by police commander Jon Burge. That's their story. However, he was denied a certificate of innocence by a judge on the grounds that he was probably guilty after all. The woman was gang raped and tortured with a hot iron in his own bedroom, in his house. Doesn't look very innocent, does it? <br />There's a lot of room for doubt in many cases without jumping on one person's bandwagon or other. It's best to be skeptical about both guilt or innocence until one has all the facts available. Chicago guynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24200494.post-45369421241045782952014-11-29T11:04:50.824-05:002014-11-29T11:04:50.824-05:00And don't forget Neufeld supported Nifong earl...And don't forget Neufeld supported Nifong early on in the Duke Lacrosse Hoax. He said you don't need DNA for a rape conviction. About the total opposite of what the "Innocence Project" supposedly preaches. <br /><br />Barry Scheck (a big MSM favorite) was completely silent. If Scheck had spoken out against Nifong the Hoax might not have gone as far as it did. <br /><br />David In TNAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com